Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption in anterior teeth after treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances, measured with cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Renata Samulak, Małgorzata Tomasik, Nanxi Tao, Bartłomiej Górski, Maciej Mularczyk, Monika Machoy
{"title":"Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption in anterior teeth after treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances, measured with cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Renata Samulak, Małgorzata Tomasik, Nanxi Tao, Bartłomiej Górski, Maciej Mularczyk, Monika Machoy","doi":"10.17219/dmp/207333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) is a common complication of orthodontic treatment. Clear aligners (CA) are thought to deliver lighter, intermittent forces than fixed appliances (FA), potentially reducing the extent of root resorption. However, comparative evidence remains limited, particularly from studies using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).This meta-analysis aimed to compare anterior tooth root resorption following treatment with CA vs. FA in patients with similar malocclusions, using CBCT-based linear measurements.A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were eligible if they included patients older than 14 years with fully developed anterior roots and comparable malocclusion severity, and if they used CBCT to assess changes in the root length before and after treatment with either CA or FA. The random-effects meta-regression model was used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) in root resorption. Subgroup analyses were performed according to tooth type and extraction status.Four high-quality cohort studies, comprising a total of 1,204 anterior teeth, met the inclusion criteria. Root resorption was significantly lower in the CA group than in the FA group (WMD: -0.47 mm; 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.40 vs. WMD: -0.54 mm; 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.33; p < 0.01). The difference was most pronounced in non-extraction cases involving the maxillary central incisors.Clear aligners are associated with significantly less anterior root resorption than FA in patients with comparable malocclusions. Although the absolute difference is modest, CA may represent a favorable treatment option for patients at increased risk of OIIRR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"63 2","pages":"497-508"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/207333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) is a common complication of orthodontic treatment. Clear aligners (CA) are thought to deliver lighter, intermittent forces than fixed appliances (FA), potentially reducing the extent of root resorption. However, comparative evidence remains limited, particularly from studies using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).This meta-analysis aimed to compare anterior tooth root resorption following treatment with CA vs. FA in patients with similar malocclusions, using CBCT-based linear measurements.A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were eligible if they included patients older than 14 years with fully developed anterior roots and comparable malocclusion severity, and if they used CBCT to assess changes in the root length before and after treatment with either CA or FA. The random-effects meta-regression model was used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) in root resorption. Subgroup analyses were performed according to tooth type and extraction status.Four high-quality cohort studies, comprising a total of 1,204 anterior teeth, met the inclusion criteria. Root resorption was significantly lower in the CA group than in the FA group (WMD: -0.47 mm; 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.40 vs. WMD: -0.54 mm; 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.33; p < 0.01). The difference was most pronounced in non-extraction cases involving the maxillary central incisors.Clear aligners are associated with significantly less anterior root resorption than FA in patients with comparable malocclusions. Although the absolute difference is modest, CA may represent a favorable treatment option for patients at increased risk of OIIRR.

正畸诱导的前牙炎症性牙根吸收:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析:使用透明矫正器和固定矫治器治疗后,用锥形束计算机断层扫描测量。
正畸诱导炎症性牙根吸收(OIIRR)是正畸治疗中常见的并发症。透明矫正器(CA)被认为比固定矫治器(FA)提供更轻的间歇力,潜在地减少了牙根吸收的程度。然而,比较证据仍然有限,特别是来自锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的研究。本荟萃分析旨在通过基于cbct的线性测量,比较类似错颌患者在CA和FA治疗后的前牙根吸收。按照PRISMA指南对MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library进行系统检索。如果纳入年龄大于14岁且前牙根发育完全且错牙合严重程度相当的患者,并且使用CBCT评估CA或FA治疗前后牙根长度的变化,则研究是合格的。采用随机效应元回归模型估计根吸收的加权平均差(WMD)。根据牙型和拔牙情况进行亚组分析。四项高质量队列研究,共包括1204颗前牙,符合纳入标准。CA组的根吸收明显低于FA组(WMD: -0.47 mm; 95% CI: -0.55 ~ -0.40 vs. WMD: -0.54 mm; 95% CI: -0.75 ~ -0.33; p < 0.01)。在未拔除上颌中切牙的病例中,差异最为明显。在类似的错颌患者中,透明矫正器与FA相比显著减少前牙根吸收相关。虽然绝对差异不大,但对于OIIRR风险增加的患者,CA可能是一种有利的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书