Clinical Feasibility of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Avelumab Maintenance after Enfortumab Vedotin plus Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Series.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2026-05-21 DOI:10.1159/000552622
Masaomi Ikeda, Satoshi Ichikawa, Shunsuke Ito, Kazuki Okumura, Yuriko Otsu, Izuru Shiba, Yutaka Shiono, Soichiro Shimura, Kohei Mori, Shuhei Hirano, Dai Koguchi, Hideyasu Tsumura, Daisuke Ishii, Kazumasa Matsumoto
{"title":"Clinical Feasibility of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Avelumab Maintenance after Enfortumab Vedotin plus Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Series.","authors":"Masaomi Ikeda, Satoshi Ichikawa, Shunsuke Ito, Kazuki Okumura, Yuriko Otsu, Izuru Shiba, Yutaka Shiono, Soichiro Shimura, Kohei Mori, Shuhei Hirano, Dai Koguchi, Hideyasu Tsumura, Daisuke Ishii, Kazumasa Matsumoto","doi":"10.1159/000552622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) has caused a paradigm shift in the first-line treatment strategies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, no standard subsequent therapy has been established after EVP therapy, and the role of platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab maintenance therapy remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We report three cases of mUC treated with EVP followed by PBC and subsequent avelumab maintenance therapy. As the first-line treatment, EVP achieved disease control in all cases; however, disease progression or treatment discontinuation occurred. Subsequent PBC resulted in stable disease or partial response. Afterward, patients were transitioned to avelumab maintenance therapy, which resulted in further tumor regression or sustained disease control, even in patients with prior pembrolizumab exposure and those who discontinued EVP therapy due to adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBC is often considered as a subsequent treatment after EVP therapy, except in patients with FGFR gene alterations. PBC followed by avelumab maintenance therapy may represent a feasible subsequent treatment option for selected patients with mUC who achieve disease control after EVP therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10047,"journal":{"name":"Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000552622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) has caused a paradigm shift in the first-line treatment strategies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, no standard subsequent therapy has been established after EVP therapy, and the role of platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab maintenance therapy remains unclear.

Case presentation: We report three cases of mUC treated with EVP followed by PBC and subsequent avelumab maintenance therapy. As the first-line treatment, EVP achieved disease control in all cases; however, disease progression or treatment discontinuation occurred. Subsequent PBC resulted in stable disease or partial response. Afterward, patients were transitioned to avelumab maintenance therapy, which resulted in further tumor regression or sustained disease control, even in patients with prior pembrolizumab exposure and those who discontinued EVP therapy due to adverse events.

Conclusion: PBC is often considered as a subsequent treatment after EVP therapy, except in patients with FGFR gene alterations. PBC followed by avelumab maintenance therapy may represent a feasible subsequent treatment option for selected patients with mUC who achieve disease control after EVP therapy.

转移性尿路上皮癌患者在安可图单抗加派姆单抗治疗后,铂基化疗后维持阿韦单抗的临床可行性:一个病例系列
简介:enfortumab vedotin联合派姆单抗(pembrolizumab, EVP)的引入已经引起了转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)一线治疗策略的范式转变。然而,EVP治疗后没有标准的后续治疗方法,并且铂基化疗(PBC)和avelumab维持治疗的作用仍不清楚。病例介绍:我们报告了三例用EVP治疗的mUC,随后是PBC和随后的avelumab维持治疗。作为一线治疗,EVP在所有病例中都实现了疾病控制,但出现了疾病进展或停药。随后的PBC导致疾病稳定或部分缓解。之后,患者转至avelumab维持治疗,这导致进一步的肿瘤消退或持续的疾病控制,即使是先前使用派姆单抗的患者和因不良事件而停止EVP治疗的患者。结论:除了FGFR基因改变的患者外,PBC通常被认为是EVP治疗后的后续治疗。对于EVP治疗后获得疾病控制的mUC患者,PBC加avelumab维持治疗可能是一种可行的后续治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original research articles and state-of-the-art reviews on all aspects of antimicrobial and antitumor chemotherapy. The results of experimental and clinical investigations into the microbiological and pharmacologic properties of antibacterial, antiviral and antitumor compounds are major topics of publication. Papers selected for the journal offer data concerning the efficacy, toxicology, and interactions of new drugs in single or combined applications. Studies designed to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of similar preparations and comparing their efficacy are also included. Special emphasis is given to the development of drug-resistance, an increasing problem worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书