Rehabilitation and Return to Play Protocols Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation for Knee Chondral Lesions in Athletic Populations.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
S Ryan Pierson, Richard M Silverman, Brock Knapp, Robert H Brophy
{"title":"Rehabilitation and Return to Play Protocols Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation for Knee Chondral Lesions in Athletic Populations.","authors":"S Ryan Pierson, Richard M Silverman, Brock Knapp, Robert H Brophy","doi":"10.1007/s12178-026-10033-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OATS) and osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) are established cartilage restoration procedures for symptomatic chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee in athletes. Postoperative rehabilitation is central to graft healing and incorporation, functional recovery, and safe return to play (RTP). This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on rehabilitation after OATS and OCA, including weight-bearing progression, bracing, range of motion, blood flow restriction training, and RTP criteria.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Systematic reviews and survey studies report substantial variability in rehabilitation protocols, including weight-bearing timelines, bracing duration, continuous passive motion utilization, and RTP criteria. Few published protocols incorporate objective functional testing to guide RTP. Criteria-based frameworks that individualize progression by graft type, lesion location, and functional milestones are increasingly advocated, although supporting evidence remains limited. Blood flow restriction training may help preserve strength early after surgery, but data specific to OATS and OCA remain sparse. Return to play is commonly reported after both procedures, with earlier timelines more frequently reported after OATS than OCA. Rehabilitation after OATS and OCA requires balancing early graft protection with progressive restoration of motion, strength, and sport-specific capacity. Current evidence demonstrates wide protocol heterogeneity and continued reliance on time-based milestones, with underuse of objective RTP criteria. Standardized, criteria-driven pathways and multidisciplinary decision-making may improve consistency and optimize outcomes in athletic populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13197494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10033-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OATS) and osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) are established cartilage restoration procedures for symptomatic chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee in athletes. Postoperative rehabilitation is central to graft healing and incorporation, functional recovery, and safe return to play (RTP). This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on rehabilitation after OATS and OCA, including weight-bearing progression, bracing, range of motion, blood flow restriction training, and RTP criteria.

Recent findings: Systematic reviews and survey studies report substantial variability in rehabilitation protocols, including weight-bearing timelines, bracing duration, continuous passive motion utilization, and RTP criteria. Few published protocols incorporate objective functional testing to guide RTP. Criteria-based frameworks that individualize progression by graft type, lesion location, and functional milestones are increasingly advocated, although supporting evidence remains limited. Blood flow restriction training may help preserve strength early after surgery, but data specific to OATS and OCA remain sparse. Return to play is commonly reported after both procedures, with earlier timelines more frequently reported after OATS than OCA. Rehabilitation after OATS and OCA requires balancing early graft protection with progressive restoration of motion, strength, and sport-specific capacity. Current evidence demonstrates wide protocol heterogeneity and continued reliance on time-based milestones, with underuse of objective RTP criteria. Standardized, criteria-driven pathways and multidisciplinary decision-making may improve consistency and optimize outcomes in athletic populations.

运动人群膝关节软骨病变自体骨软骨移植和同种异体骨软骨移植后的康复和恢复方案。
综述目的:自体骨软骨移植(OATS)和同种异体骨软骨移植(OCA)是治疗运动员膝关节症状性软骨和骨软骨缺损的成熟的软骨修复方法。术后康复是移植物愈合和融合、功能恢复和安全重返赛场(RTP)的核心。本综述综合了燕麦和OCA后康复的当代证据,包括负重进展、支架、运动范围、血流限制训练和RTP标准。最近的发现:系统回顾和调查研究报告了康复方案的实质性变化,包括负重时间表、支具持续时间、持续被动运动的利用和RTP标准。很少有已发布的协议包含客观功能测试来指导RTP。尽管支持的证据仍然有限,但越来越多的人提倡基于标准的框架,根据移植物类型、病变位置和功能里程碑来个性化进展。限制血流训练可能有助于术后早期保持力量,但关于OATS和OCA的具体数据仍然很少。通常在两种手术后都能恢复比赛,相比于OCA,在OATS手术后更早的时间线更常被报道。燕麦和OCA后的康复需要平衡早期移植物保护与运动、力量和运动特定能力的逐步恢复。目前的证据表明,协议存在广泛的异质性,并且继续依赖于基于时间的里程碑,而客观RTP标准的使用不足。标准化的、标准驱动的途径和多学科决策可以提高运动人群的一致性和优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书