Color Trails Test: regression-based norms for Russian-speakers.

IF 2.1
Zarui A Melikyan, Jason R Bock, Anna V Agranovich
{"title":"Color Trails Test: regression-based norms for Russian-speakers.","authors":"Zarui A Melikyan, Jason R Bock, Anna V Agranovich","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acag035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Color Trails Test (CTT) is widely used across cultures and necessitates culture-relevant norms due to cultural differences in the test performance. However, no norms exist for Russian-speakers. The study aims to: (a) establish regression-based CTT norms for Russian-speaking adults, and (b) compare CTT T-scores for Russian-speakers derived using regression-based norms (RBNs) with the manual norms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Community-dwelling healthy Russian-speaking adults were administered the CTT using standard procedures. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to establish RBNs. The participant data were used to calculate two sets of T-scores, using: (a) RBNs and the leave-one-out analysis, and (b) CTT manual norms. These two sets of T-scores were compared by t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 196 participants was 37 years [range: 18-86]; 108 (55%) were women, and 102 (52%) had at least university education. CTT completion time was associated with age and education, but not sex. CTT1 T-scores derived from regression-based were higher than manual norms (M difference = 2.39, SD difference = 5.51, p < .001). There was no difference between CTT2 T-scores. Regression-based norms identified fewer participants as performing below average (T ≤36): 7% vs. 18% for CTT1 and 7% vs. 10% for CTT2, p < .001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed RBNs, developed from a representative sample of Russian-speaking adults, will enhance assessment accuracy and improve diagnostic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13189164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acag035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Color Trails Test (CTT) is widely used across cultures and necessitates culture-relevant norms due to cultural differences in the test performance. However, no norms exist for Russian-speakers. The study aims to: (a) establish regression-based CTT norms for Russian-speaking adults, and (b) compare CTT T-scores for Russian-speakers derived using regression-based norms (RBNs) with the manual norms.

Method: Community-dwelling healthy Russian-speaking adults were administered the CTT using standard procedures. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to establish RBNs. The participant data were used to calculate two sets of T-scores, using: (a) RBNs and the leave-one-out analysis, and (b) CTT manual norms. These two sets of T-scores were compared by t-test.

Results: The mean age of the 196 participants was 37 years [range: 18-86]; 108 (55%) were women, and 102 (52%) had at least university education. CTT completion time was associated with age and education, but not sex. CTT1 T-scores derived from regression-based were higher than manual norms (M difference = 2.39, SD difference = 5.51, p < .001). There was no difference between CTT2 T-scores. Regression-based norms identified fewer participants as performing below average (T ≤36): 7% vs. 18% for CTT1 and 7% vs. 10% for CTT2, p < .001.

Conclusions: The proposed RBNs, developed from a representative sample of Russian-speaking adults, will enhance assessment accuracy and improve diagnostic outcomes.

颜色轨迹测试:俄语使用者的回归规范。
目的:色迹测验(CTT)在不同文化中被广泛使用,由于测验表现的文化差异,需要制定与文化相关的规范。然而,对于讲俄语的人来说,没有任何规范。本研究旨在:(a)建立基于回归的俄语成人CTT规范,(b)比较使用基于回归规范(RBNs)得出的俄语成人CTT t -得分与手动规范。方法:采用标准程序对居住在社区的健康俄语成年人进行CTT。采用多元线性回归分析建立rbn。参与者数据被用来计算两组t得分,使用:(a) rbn和留一分析,以及(b) CTT手动规范。采用t检验比较两组t得分。结果:196名参与者平均年龄37岁[范围:18-86岁];108人(55%)是女性,102人(52%)至少受过大学教育。完成CTT的时间与年龄和教育程度有关,而与性别无关。基于回归的CTT1 t -评分高于手工标准(M差= 2.39,SD差= 5.51,p)。结论:从讲俄语的成年人的代表性样本中开发的rbn将提高评估准确性并改善诊断结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书