Irene Teo, Jyotika Puri, Parth Chodavadia, Jia Huan Ho, Daniel Poremski, Daniel Shuen Sheng Fung, Eric Finkelstein
{"title":"Interest in peer support among Singaporean adults with symptoms of anxiety and depression.","authors":"Irene Teo, Jyotika Puri, Parth Chodavadia, Jia Huan Ho, Daniel Poremski, Daniel Shuen Sheng Fung, Eric Finkelstein","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to formal mental health care remains limited in Asia. Peer support can be a viable alternative gateway or complement to formal mental health care. The current study examined interest in various types of peer support, including individual versus group and virtual versus in-person, among Singaporean adults with symptoms of anxiety or depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was administered to members of a web panel. Participants with symptoms of depression or anxiety based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 screening tool were surveyed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine factors associated with greater interest in peer support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 panel members met our inclusion criteria. Of them, 77% had not received formal mental healthcare services, while 62% indicated interest in receiving peer support. The strongest preference was for one-on-one support delivered virtually. Younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, P < 0.01), working in white-collar managerial as opposed to white-collar non-managerial positions (OR 1.96, P < 0.05), utilising formal health care in the last 3 months (OR 2.45, P < 0.05) and previously providing peer support (OR 7.33, P < 0.01) were associated with greater interest in receiving peer support. Most of those not interested in peer support cited concerns around confidentiality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite low uptake of formal mental health care, the majority of adult Singaporeans surveyed with anxiety or depression symptoms indicated interest in receiving peer support. Greater efforts to promote peer support programmes can be part of a comprehensive strategy to address rising rates of poor mental health in Singapore.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Access to formal mental health care remains limited in Asia. Peer support can be a viable alternative gateway or complement to formal mental health care. The current study examined interest in various types of peer support, including individual versus group and virtual versus in-person, among Singaporean adults with symptoms of anxiety or depression.
Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to members of a web panel. Participants with symptoms of depression or anxiety based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 screening tool were surveyed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine factors associated with greater interest in peer support.
Results: A total of 350 panel members met our inclusion criteria. Of them, 77% had not received formal mental healthcare services, while 62% indicated interest in receiving peer support. The strongest preference was for one-on-one support delivered virtually. Younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, P < 0.01), working in white-collar managerial as opposed to white-collar non-managerial positions (OR 1.96, P < 0.05), utilising formal health care in the last 3 months (OR 2.45, P < 0.05) and previously providing peer support (OR 7.33, P < 0.01) were associated with greater interest in receiving peer support. Most of those not interested in peer support cited concerns around confidentiality.
Conclusion: Despite low uptake of formal mental health care, the majority of adult Singaporeans surveyed with anxiety or depression symptoms indicated interest in receiving peer support. Greater efforts to promote peer support programmes can be part of a comprehensive strategy to address rising rates of poor mental health in Singapore.
导言:在亚洲,获得正规精神卫生保健的机会仍然有限。同伴支持可以是正式精神卫生保健的可行替代途径或补充。目前的研究调查了有焦虑或抑郁症状的新加坡成年人对各种类型的同伴支持的兴趣,包括个人与团体、虚拟与面对面的支持。方法:对网络小组成员进行横断面在线调查。根据患者健康问卷-4筛选工具对有抑郁或焦虑症状的参与者进行调查。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以检验与同伴支持兴趣增加相关的因素。结果:共有350名小组成员符合我们的纳入标准。其中,77%的人没有接受过正式的精神保健服务,62%的人表示有兴趣接受同伴支持。最强烈的偏好是一对一的虚拟支持。年龄较小(比值比[OR] 1.05, P < 0.01)、从事白领管理工作而非白领非管理职位(比值比[OR] 1.96, P < 0.05)、最近3个月内使用过正规医疗保健(比值比[OR] 2.45, P < 0.05)和以前提供过同伴支持(比值比[OR] 7.33, P < 0.01)与获得同伴支持的兴趣更大相关。大多数对同伴支持不感兴趣的人提到了对保密的担忧。结论:尽管接受正规精神卫生保健的人很少,但接受调查的大多数有焦虑或抑郁症状的新加坡成年人表示有兴趣接受同伴支持。为促进同伴支持方案作出更大努力,可作为解决新加坡心理健康不良比率上升问题的综合战略的一部分。