Functional properties improve predictions of long-term productivity invariability but not resistance to drought.

IF 4.3
Ecology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70421
Sierra B Perez, Jennifer A Lau
{"title":"Functional properties improve predictions of long-term productivity invariability but not resistance to drought.","authors":"Sierra B Perez, Jennifer A Lau","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying the factors mediating the resilience and invariability of plant communities and their associated ecosystem functions is critical to understand the ecological impacts of climate change. Prior work has explored how classic \"community properties\" (characterizing a community by species composition) regulate the resilience and invariability of ecosystem functioning. Mechanistically, community properties influence resilience and invariability via species' traits, and as a result, \"functional properties\" (characterizing a community via functional traits) might better predict these qualities. For example, functional traits associated with conservative resource-use strategies (e.g., short stature, low specific leaf area [SLA], high leaf dry matter content [LDMC]) are expected to promote both resistance to periods of stress or resource limitation and long-term invariability. While there is a strong conceptual basis linking functional traits and functional diversity to resilience and invariability, empirical evidence is thus far mixed, and sourcing accurate functional trait data may be challenging. Therefore, it is important to know if community properties are sufficient for evaluating the resilience and invariability of ecosystem functioning, or if functional properties provide necessary insights. Capitalizing on a decades-long study, we tested the effects of plant functional and community properties on the resistance of ecosystem functioning (a component of resilience) to drought or long-term invariability. Including functional properties did not improve our ability to explain primary productivity resistance to droughts but considerably improved our explanatory power for productivity invariability. Our results supported expectations that conservative trait strategies promote ecosystem functioning resistance to perturbations and temporal invariability. These findings highlight that the utility of functional properties in explaining the resilience and invariability of ecosystem functioning may depend on the attribute under consideration and that functional properties may primarily be useful for identifying the traits promoting resilience and invariability.</p>","PeriodicalId":93986,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 5","pages":"e70421"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the factors mediating the resilience and invariability of plant communities and their associated ecosystem functions is critical to understand the ecological impacts of climate change. Prior work has explored how classic "community properties" (characterizing a community by species composition) regulate the resilience and invariability of ecosystem functioning. Mechanistically, community properties influence resilience and invariability via species' traits, and as a result, "functional properties" (characterizing a community via functional traits) might better predict these qualities. For example, functional traits associated with conservative resource-use strategies (e.g., short stature, low specific leaf area [SLA], high leaf dry matter content [LDMC]) are expected to promote both resistance to periods of stress or resource limitation and long-term invariability. While there is a strong conceptual basis linking functional traits and functional diversity to resilience and invariability, empirical evidence is thus far mixed, and sourcing accurate functional trait data may be challenging. Therefore, it is important to know if community properties are sufficient for evaluating the resilience and invariability of ecosystem functioning, or if functional properties provide necessary insights. Capitalizing on a decades-long study, we tested the effects of plant functional and community properties on the resistance of ecosystem functioning (a component of resilience) to drought or long-term invariability. Including functional properties did not improve our ability to explain primary productivity resistance to droughts but considerably improved our explanatory power for productivity invariability. Our results supported expectations that conservative trait strategies promote ecosystem functioning resistance to perturbations and temporal invariability. These findings highlight that the utility of functional properties in explaining the resilience and invariability of ecosystem functioning may depend on the attribute under consideration and that functional properties may primarily be useful for identifying the traits promoting resilience and invariability.

功能特性提高了对长期生产力不变性的预测,但不能提高对干旱的抵抗力。
识别介导植物群落恢复力和不变性及其相关生态系统功能的因子对于理解气候变化的生态影响至关重要。先前的工作已经探索了经典的“群落属性”(通过物种组成来表征群落)如何调节生态系统功能的弹性和不变性。从机制上讲,群落特性通过物种特征影响弹性和不变性,因此,“功能特性”(通过功能特征描述群落)可能更好地预测这些特性。例如,与保守资源利用策略相关的功能性状(如矮小、低比叶面积(SLA)、高叶干物质含量(LDMC))有望促进对胁迫或资源限制时期的抗性和长期不变性。虽然将功能性状和功能多样性与恢复力和不变性联系起来有很强的概念基础,但迄今为止,经验证据是混合的,并且获取准确的功能性状数据可能具有挑战性。因此,了解群落属性是否足以评估生态系统功能的弹性和不变性,或者功能属性是否提供必要的见解是很重要的。利用一项长达数十年的研究,我们测试了植物功能和群落特性对生态系统功能(恢复力的一个组成部分)对干旱或长期不变性的抗性的影响。包括功能特性并没有提高我们解释初级生产力对干旱的抵抗力的能力,但大大提高了我们对生产力不变性的解释能力。我们的研究结果支持了保守性状策略促进生态系统功能抵抗扰动和时间不变性的预期。这些发现强调,功能属性在解释生态系统功能的弹性和不变性方面的效用可能取决于所考虑的属性,功能属性可能主要用于识别促进弹性和不变性的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书