Prefrontal and Occipital Network Excitability Differences in Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 1.7
Noa Bregman, Noa Zifman, Hilla Fogel, Eden Abulher, Inbal Maidan, Tamara Shiner
{"title":"Prefrontal and Occipital Network Excitability Differences in Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Noa Bregman, Noa Zifman, Hilla Fogel, Eden Abulher, Inbal Maidan, Tamara Shiner","doi":"10.1177/15500594261452759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThere is a great need in distinguishing Dementia with Lewy Body (DLB) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and elucidating its pathophysiology. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evoked potentials (TEPs) offer a non-invasive measure of neurophysiological alterations associated with underlying disease pathology.MethodsA total of 39 participants were included: 12 DLB, 10 AD, and 17 age-matched healthy controls (HC). TEPs were measured in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), primary motor cortex (M1), and primary visual cortex (V1).ResultsGlobal mean field potential (GMFP) TEP (130-250 ms) showed a significant interaction of group and stimulation site (<i>p</i> = .0101, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.175) with a significant group effect (<i>p</i> = .0071, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.234), attributed to higher GMFP in DLB compared to AD and HC in response to V1 stimulation (<i>p</i> = .001, <i>p</i> = .001, respectively). TEP amplitude corresponding to P60 displayed a significant group*stimulation site interaction (<i>p</i> = .0037, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.202) arising from differences in DLPFC stimulation, between DLB compared to AD (<i>p</i> = .0013) and HC (<i>p</i> = .0032). DLPFC N45 presented a significant stimulation site effect not associated to a specific group in addition to DLPFC N45 amplitude being correlated to the UPDRS-III score (r = 0.9, <i>p</i> = .0002). A relative higher left over right DLPFC P30 amplitude was correlated with poorer MoCA scores in AD (r = -0.84, <i>p</i> = .002), as indicated by others before.ConclusionsDLPFC may be a target for both diagnosis and assessment of severity of motor symptoms in DLB and cognitive impairment in AD. These results propose a promising method to non-invasively distinguish DLB from AD and monitor disease, based on DLPFC and V1 network characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"15500594261452759"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594261452759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a great need in distinguishing Dementia with Lewy Body (DLB) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and elucidating its pathophysiology. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evoked potentials (TEPs) offer a non-invasive measure of neurophysiological alterations associated with underlying disease pathology.MethodsA total of 39 participants were included: 12 DLB, 10 AD, and 17 age-matched healthy controls (HC). TEPs were measured in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), primary motor cortex (M1), and primary visual cortex (V1).ResultsGlobal mean field potential (GMFP) TEP (130-250 ms) showed a significant interaction of group and stimulation site (p = .0101, ηp2 = 0.175) with a significant group effect (p = .0071, ηp2 = 0.234), attributed to higher GMFP in DLB compared to AD and HC in response to V1 stimulation (p = .001, p = .001, respectively). TEP amplitude corresponding to P60 displayed a significant group*stimulation site interaction (p = .0037, ηp2 = 0.202) arising from differences in DLPFC stimulation, between DLB compared to AD (p = .0013) and HC (p = .0032). DLPFC N45 presented a significant stimulation site effect not associated to a specific group in addition to DLPFC N45 amplitude being correlated to the UPDRS-III score (r = 0.9, p = .0002). A relative higher left over right DLPFC P30 amplitude was correlated with poorer MoCA scores in AD (r = -0.84, p = .002), as indicated by others before.ConclusionsDLPFC may be a target for both diagnosis and assessment of severity of motor symptoms in DLB and cognitive impairment in AD. These results propose a promising method to non-invasively distinguish DLB from AD and monitor disease, based on DLPFC and V1 network characteristics.

路易体痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的前额叶和枕叶网络兴奋性差异。
背景将路易体痴呆(DLB)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)区分并阐明其病理生理机制具有重要意义。经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发电位(TEPs)提供了与潜在疾病病理相关的神经生理改变的非侵入性测量。方法共纳入39例受试者:12例DLB, 10例AD, 17例年龄匹配的健康对照(HC)。在背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)、初级运动皮层(M1)和初级视觉皮层(V1)测量TEPs。结果全平均场电位(GMFP) TEP (130 ~ 250 ms)组与刺激部位的交互作用显著(p =;0101, ηp2 = 0.175),组效应显著(p =。0071, ηp2 = 0.234),这是由于DLB在V1刺激下的GMFP高于AD和HC (p =。001, p =。001年,分别)。P60对应的TEP振幅显示出组*刺激部位的显著相互作用(p =。0037, ηp2 = 0.202),由DLB与AD (p = 0.0013)和HC (p = 0.0032)之间DLPFC刺激的差异引起。除了DLPFC N45振幅与UPDRS-III评分相关外,DLPFC N45表现出与特定组无关的显著刺激位点效应(r = 0.9, p = 0.0002)。相对较高的左偏右DLPFC P30振幅与AD患者较差的MoCA评分相关(r = -0.84, p =)。002),正如其他人之前指出的那样。结论sdlpfc可能是诊断和评估DLB患者运动症状严重程度和AD患者认知功能障碍的指标。这些结果提出了一种基于DLPFC和V1网络特征的无创区分DLB和AD并监测疾病的有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书