Dental stewardship implementation and antimicrobial resistance awareness in India: prescribing patterns, knowledge gaps, and barriers-systematic review with narrative synthesis.

Rasha Abdelsalam Elshenawy, Rishal Dsouza
{"title":"Dental stewardship implementation and antimicrobial resistance awareness in India: prescribing patterns, knowledge gaps, and barriers-systematic review with narrative synthesis.","authors":"Rasha Abdelsalam Elshenawy, Rishal Dsouza","doi":"10.1017/ash.2026.10388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health threat, with drug-resistant infections projected to cause up to 10 million deaths annually by 2050. India bears a disproportionate share of this burden. Dental practitioners contribute approximately 10% of national antibiotic prescriptions; however, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in dental settings remains underdeveloped, with no national dental-specific guidelines. This systematic review with narrative synthesis evaluates AMR awareness and AMS implementation among Indian dental professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five databases were searched for studies published between January 2014 and December 2024. Eligible studies of any design examined AMR awareness, AMS behaviors, or antibiotic prescribing practices among Indian dental practitioners. Methodological quality was independently appraised using CASP checklists. Due to substantial heterogeneity across study designs and outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1,852 records, 14 studies involving 3,602 participants were included. All studies referenced guidelines or clinical pathways. Prescribing practices were the most frequently assessed outcome (12/14; 86%), followed by compliance (9/14; 64%) and knowledge or awareness (6/14; 43%). Key findings included significant knowledge-practice gaps, inappropriate prescribing patterns, and the absence of structured stewardship infrastructure. Facilitators included baseline AMR awareness and professional willingness to engage, while barriers included curriculum deficiencies and limited access to guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structured dental AMS programs are both urgently needed and feasible in India. Addressing modifiable drivers through national prescribing guidelines, integrated AMS education, and audit and feedback systems is essential to support AMR containment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"6 1","pages":"e146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13184568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health threat, with drug-resistant infections projected to cause up to 10 million deaths annually by 2050. India bears a disproportionate share of this burden. Dental practitioners contribute approximately 10% of national antibiotic prescriptions; however, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in dental settings remains underdeveloped, with no national dental-specific guidelines. This systematic review with narrative synthesis evaluates AMR awareness and AMS implementation among Indian dental professionals.

Methods: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five databases were searched for studies published between January 2014 and December 2024. Eligible studies of any design examined AMR awareness, AMS behaviors, or antibiotic prescribing practices among Indian dental practitioners. Methodological quality was independently appraised using CASP checklists. Due to substantial heterogeneity across study designs and outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively and analyzed thematically.

Results: From 1,852 records, 14 studies involving 3,602 participants were included. All studies referenced guidelines or clinical pathways. Prescribing practices were the most frequently assessed outcome (12/14; 86%), followed by compliance (9/14; 64%) and knowledge or awareness (6/14; 43%). Key findings included significant knowledge-practice gaps, inappropriate prescribing patterns, and the absence of structured stewardship infrastructure. Facilitators included baseline AMR awareness and professional willingness to engage, while barriers included curriculum deficiencies and limited access to guidelines.

Conclusions: Structured dental AMS programs are both urgently needed and feasible in India. Addressing modifiable drivers through national prescribing guidelines, integrated AMS education, and audit and feedback systems is essential to support AMR containment.

印度的牙科管理实施和抗菌素耐药性意识:处方模式、知识差距和障碍——系统综述。
导言:抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)是一个严重的全球健康威胁,预计到2050年,耐药感染每年将导致多达1000万人死亡。印度在这一负担中所占的份额不成比例。牙科医生占全国抗生素处方的约10%;然而,牙科环境中的抗菌药物管理(AMS)仍然不发达,没有国家牙科特定指南。本系统综述与叙事综合评估AMR的认识和AMS在印度牙科专业人员的实施。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南,采用叙事综合的方法进行系统评价。在五个数据库中检索了2014年1月至2024年12月间发表的研究。任何设计的合格研究都检查了印度牙科医生的抗微生物药物耐药性意识、抗微生物药物耐药性行为或抗生素处方实践。使用CASP检查表对方法学质量进行独立评价。由于研究设计和结果存在很大的异质性,研究结果以叙述的方式综合并按主题进行分析。结果:从1852份记录中,纳入了14项研究,涉及3,602名参与者。所有的研究都参考了指南或临床途径。处方实践是最常被评估的结果(12/14;86%),其次是依从性(9/14;64%)和知识或意识(6/14;43%)。主要发现包括重大的知识与实践差距、不适当的处方模式以及缺乏结构化的管理基础设施。促进因素包括基本的抗菌素耐药性意识和参与的专业意愿,而障碍包括课程不足和获得指导方针的机会有限。结论:结构化牙科辅助医疗系统项目在印度是迫切需要和可行的。通过国家处方指南、综合AMS教育以及审计和反馈系统解决可改变的驱动因素,对于支持AMR控制至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书