Participation Education Intervention for People With SCI From LMIC: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Moussa Kleib Abumostafa, Nicola Ann Plastow, Maggi Savin-Baden
{"title":"Participation Education Intervention for People With SCI From LMIC: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Moussa Kleib Abumostafa, Nicola Ann Plastow, Maggi Savin-Baden","doi":"10.1155/oti/8774897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with inequality-related participation restrictions. Participation education has been proposed as an intervention to promote participation in daily occupations. This pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluates the feasibility and minimal effect of the SADL-eM, a participation educational intervention, on the participation of people with spinal cord injury (PW-SCI) in daily occupations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm pilot RCT included 32 PW-SCI from three inpatient rehabilitation settings in the Gaza Strip aged 18-65 years. Eligible cases were randomized equally into two groups. Both groups received standard care. The intervention group also used the SADL-eM during occupational therapy sessions. Participation and adherence were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks. The Arabic version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure-Self Reported (SCIM-SR-Ar) was the primary outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic and injury characteristics were homogenous at baseline (p > 0.05). There was no difference between groups at baseline (p < 0.05). Comparing intervention to standard care, the SADL-eM was insignificant after 6 weeks of intervention (p > 0.05) while the inpatient rehabilitation improved participation in daily occupations (16.06%-17.00%) in the total sample (p ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an improvement in all outcome measures used; however, the SADL-eM did not reach significance. The intended RCT has major barriers, for example, a low recruitment rate. Community settings can be unique for such an RCT.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04735887.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2026 1","pages":"e8774897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13191764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/8774897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with inequality-related participation restrictions. Participation education has been proposed as an intervention to promote participation in daily occupations. This pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluates the feasibility and minimal effect of the SADL-eM, a participation educational intervention, on the participation of people with spinal cord injury (PW-SCI) in daily occupations.

Methods: A two-arm pilot RCT included 32 PW-SCI from three inpatient rehabilitation settings in the Gaza Strip aged 18-65 years. Eligible cases were randomized equally into two groups. Both groups received standard care. The intervention group also used the SADL-eM during occupational therapy sessions. Participation and adherence were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks. The Arabic version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure-Self Reported (SCIM-SR-Ar) was the primary outcome measure.

Results: Demographic and injury characteristics were homogenous at baseline (p > 0.05). There was no difference between groups at baseline (p < 0.05). Comparing intervention to standard care, the SADL-eM was insignificant after 6 weeks of intervention (p > 0.05) while the inpatient rehabilitation improved participation in daily occupations (16.06%-17.00%) in the total sample (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: There was an improvement in all outcome measures used; however, the SADL-eM did not reach significance. The intended RCT has major barriers, for example, a low recruitment rate. Community settings can be unique for such an RCT.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04735887.

LMIC脊髓损伤患者的参与教育干预:一项试点随机临床试验。
简介:脊髓损伤(SCI)与不平等相关的参与限制有关。参与式教育已被提出作为一种干预措施,以促进参与日常职业。本随机临床试验(RCT)评估了SADL-eM(一种参与性教育干预)对脊髓损伤(PW-SCI)患者参与日常工作的可行性和最小影响。方法:一项双臂先导随机对照试验纳入了32名来自加沙地带3个住院康复机构的18-65岁的PW-SCI患者。符合条件的病例被随机分为两组。两组均接受标准治疗。干预组在职业治疗期间也使用SADL-eM。参与和依从性在基线和6周后进行评估。阿拉伯语版本的脊髓独立性测量-自我报告(sci - sr - ar)是主要的结局测量。结果:人口统计学和损伤特征在基线时是均匀的(p < 0.05)。两组在基线时差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与标准治疗相比,干预6周后SADL-eM不显著(p < 0.05),而住院康复改善了总样本的日常职业参与(16.06% ~ 17.00%)(p≤0.001)。结论:使用的所有结局指标均有改善;然而,SADL-eM并没有达到重要意义。预期的随机对照试验存在主要障碍,例如招募率低。对于这样的随机对照试验,社区环境可能是独特的。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04735887。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书