Irene Frassineti, Lorenzo Cinci, Andrea Magnini, Maria Pisano, Luigi Barbato, Francesco Cairo, Luisella Cianferotti, Cosimo Nardi
{"title":"Cone Beam Computed Tomography of Bonejaws in Patients With Primary Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Irene Frassineti, Lorenzo Cinci, Andrea Magnini, Maria Pisano, Luigi Barbato, Francesco Cairo, Luisella Cianferotti, Cosimo Nardi","doi":"10.1007/s11914-026-00972-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the potential of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) parameters to identify primary osteoporosis in jawbones.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Early diagnosis of osteoporosis is crucial but challenging. Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard to measure bone density, nevertheless it has limitations including cost, radiation dose, and 2D imaging. CBCT is a volumetric imaging technique commonly used in dentistry that showed promise as an alternative tool due to its high spatial resolution and excellent analysis of bone structures. Mandibular and maxillary CBCT indices showed a strong correlation with Bone Mineral Density (BMD) assessed by DXA. Regional indices (Anterior, Molar, and Posterior), quantitative indices (Computed Tomography Mandibular Index, Computed Tomography Index Superior and Inferior), Radiographic Density, Fractal Dimension, and the qualitative index named Computed Tomography Cortical Index seemed appropriate for the detection of primary osteoporosis. Morphometric parameters for trabecular bone did not show differences between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients. Future studies should assess diagnostic accuracy of such CBCT indices and formulate standardized measurement protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":48750,"journal":{"name":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-026-00972-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This study aimed to investigate the potential of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) parameters to identify primary osteoporosis in jawbones.
Recent findings: Early diagnosis of osteoporosis is crucial but challenging. Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard to measure bone density, nevertheless it has limitations including cost, radiation dose, and 2D imaging. CBCT is a volumetric imaging technique commonly used in dentistry that showed promise as an alternative tool due to its high spatial resolution and excellent analysis of bone structures. Mandibular and maxillary CBCT indices showed a strong correlation with Bone Mineral Density (BMD) assessed by DXA. Regional indices (Anterior, Molar, and Posterior), quantitative indices (Computed Tomography Mandibular Index, Computed Tomography Index Superior and Inferior), Radiographic Density, Fractal Dimension, and the qualitative index named Computed Tomography Cortical Index seemed appropriate for the detection of primary osteoporosis. Morphometric parameters for trabecular bone did not show differences between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients. Future studies should assess diagnostic accuracy of such CBCT indices and formulate standardized measurement protocols.
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of osteoporosis.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as current and future therapeutics, epidemiology and pathophysiology, and evaluation and management. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.