Imaging Immunotherapy.

Q3 Medicine
Egesta Lopci, Angelo Castello, Matteo Caracciolo, Luigi Mansi, Akram Al-Ibraheem
{"title":"Imaging Immunotherapy.","authors":"Egesta Lopci, Angelo Castello, Matteo Caracciolo, Luigi Mansi, Akram Al-Ibraheem","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-21415-7_12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer immunotherapy aims to enhance or reactivate immune system function by leveraging both adaptive and innate immunity mechanisms. Key approaches to stimulate tumor-specific immune responses include cytokine therapies, cancer vaccines, and immune checkpoint blockade. The field experienced transformative growth after the 2011 approval of ipilimumab (targeting CTLA-4), paving the way for subsequent inhibitors of PD-1 and PD-L1 pathways that demonstrated unprecedented survival benefits across multiple malignancies. These breakthroughs have catalyzed advancements in adoptive T cell therapies, particularly genetically modified CAR T cell infusions showing promising clinical efficacy, signaling a paradigm shift in oncology treatment approaches. Meanwhile, response assessment has faced new challenges. In fact, immunotherapy response patterns often contrast with conventional chemotherapy, particularly regarding phenomena like pseudoprogression, delayed clinical effects, and extended disease stabilization. To address these unique dynamics, revised response assessment guidelines have been established to enhance therapeutic development and clinical decision-making. This chapter examines the progression of immune-specific evaluation standards, their application in clinical trials, and their practical consequences, concluding with insights into future advancements in response classification systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":39880,"journal":{"name":"Recent Results in Cancer Research","volume":"225 ","pages":"911-943"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Results in Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-21415-7_12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy aims to enhance or reactivate immune system function by leveraging both adaptive and innate immunity mechanisms. Key approaches to stimulate tumor-specific immune responses include cytokine therapies, cancer vaccines, and immune checkpoint blockade. The field experienced transformative growth after the 2011 approval of ipilimumab (targeting CTLA-4), paving the way for subsequent inhibitors of PD-1 and PD-L1 pathways that demonstrated unprecedented survival benefits across multiple malignancies. These breakthroughs have catalyzed advancements in adoptive T cell therapies, particularly genetically modified CAR T cell infusions showing promising clinical efficacy, signaling a paradigm shift in oncology treatment approaches. Meanwhile, response assessment has faced new challenges. In fact, immunotherapy response patterns often contrast with conventional chemotherapy, particularly regarding phenomena like pseudoprogression, delayed clinical effects, and extended disease stabilization. To address these unique dynamics, revised response assessment guidelines have been established to enhance therapeutic development and clinical decision-making. This chapter examines the progression of immune-specific evaluation standards, their application in clinical trials, and their practical consequences, concluding with insights into future advancements in response classification systems.

成像免疫疗法。
癌症免疫治疗的目的是通过利用适应性和先天免疫机制来增强或重新激活免疫系统功能。刺激肿瘤特异性免疫反应的关键方法包括细胞因子疗法、癌症疫苗和免疫检查点阻断。2011年ipilimumab(靶向CTLA-4)获批后,该领域经历了变革性的增长,为随后的PD-1和PD-L1途径抑制剂铺平了道路,这些抑制剂在多种恶性肿瘤中显示出前所未有的生存益处。这些突破催化了过继性T细胞疗法的进步,特别是基因修饰的CAR - T细胞输注显示出有希望的临床疗效,标志着肿瘤治疗方法的范式转变。同时,响应评估也面临着新的挑战。事实上,免疫疗法的反应模式通常与常规化疗相反,特别是在假性进展、延迟临床效果和延长疾病稳定等现象方面。为了解决这些独特的动态,已经建立了修订的反应评估指南,以加强治疗开发和临床决策。本章探讨了免疫特异性评估标准的进展,它们在临床试验中的应用,以及它们的实际后果,最后对反应分类系统的未来进展提出了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书