Light-curing units in restorative dentistry: a clinically oriented narrative review of performance, selection, and emerging optical functions.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Romain Ceinos, Margaux Dubois, Jean-Pierre Attal, François Vigouroux, Yohann Flottes, Timothy Fasham, Elisabeth Dursun, Bruno Pelissier, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Philippe François
{"title":"Light-curing units in restorative dentistry: a clinically oriented narrative review of performance, selection, and emerging optical functions.","authors":"Romain Ceinos, Margaux Dubois, Jean-Pierre Attal, François Vigouroux, Yohann Flottes, Timothy Fasham, Elisabeth Dursun, Bruno Pelissier, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Philippe François","doi":"10.1038/s41405-026-00446-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize current evidence on dental light-curing units (LCUs), focusing on their radiometric performance, clinical selection criteria, and emerging optical functionalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review was conducted in accordance with the SANRA recommendations. A structured search of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed to identify publications addressing the technological evolution of light-curing units, the parameters guiding device selection, clinical optimization and safety considerations, as well as the integration of fluorescence, transillumination and beam-shaping adjunctive features within contemporary systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LED LCUs have become the clinical standard, evolving from monowave to polywave devices to better match both Norrish type II and type I photoinitiators. Across technologies, the effectiveness of curing depends on the delivered radiant exposure, spectral compatibility, beam homogeneity and effective tip diameter rather than the manufacturer-reported irradiance. Clinical determinants (distance, angulation, maintenance, battery state and training) strongly modulate the delivered energy. Thermal and ocular hazards must be addressed through controlled protocols and protective measures. Multifunctional LCUs integrating fluorescence-aided identification and transillumination functions and interchangeable tips may support diagnosis and workflow optimization, but independent evidence remains limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Curing should be approached as controlled energy delivery. Reliability depends on the radiant exposure, spectral compatibility and beam geometry rather than the nominal irradiance. Third-generation polywave LED LCUs appear to be the most versatile reference option for routine practice, particularly when the photoinitiator system of the material is unknown or includes Norrish type I initiators. The clinical value of integrated diagnostic and beam-shaping functions remains to be independently validated.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13190769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00446-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To synthesize current evidence on dental light-curing units (LCUs), focusing on their radiometric performance, clinical selection criteria, and emerging optical functionalities.

Methods: This narrative review was conducted in accordance with the SANRA recommendations. A structured search of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed to identify publications addressing the technological evolution of light-curing units, the parameters guiding device selection, clinical optimization and safety considerations, as well as the integration of fluorescence, transillumination and beam-shaping adjunctive features within contemporary systems.

Results: LED LCUs have become the clinical standard, evolving from monowave to polywave devices to better match both Norrish type II and type I photoinitiators. Across technologies, the effectiveness of curing depends on the delivered radiant exposure, spectral compatibility, beam homogeneity and effective tip diameter rather than the manufacturer-reported irradiance. Clinical determinants (distance, angulation, maintenance, battery state and training) strongly modulate the delivered energy. Thermal and ocular hazards must be addressed through controlled protocols and protective measures. Multifunctional LCUs integrating fluorescence-aided identification and transillumination functions and interchangeable tips may support diagnosis and workflow optimization, but independent evidence remains limited.

Conclusions: Curing should be approached as controlled energy delivery. Reliability depends on the radiant exposure, spectral compatibility and beam geometry rather than the nominal irradiance. Third-generation polywave LED LCUs appear to be the most versatile reference option for routine practice, particularly when the photoinitiator system of the material is unknown or includes Norrish type I initiators. The clinical value of integrated diagnostic and beam-shaping functions remains to be independently validated.

牙科修复中的光固化单元:临床导向的性能、选择和新出现的光学功能的叙述回顾。
目的:综合目前有关牙科光固化装置(lcu)的证据,重点介绍其放射学性能、临床选择标准和新出现的光学功能。方法:按照SANRA的建议进行叙述性综述。对PubMed/MEDLINE进行结构化搜索,以确定涉及光固化单元技术发展、参数指导装置选择、临床优化和安全考虑,以及在当代系统中整合荧光、透光和光束整形辅助功能的出版物。结果:LED lcu已成为临床标准,从单波器件发展到多波器件,以更好地匹配Norrish II型和I型光引发剂。在各种技术中,固化的有效性取决于所提供的辐射暴露、光谱兼容性、光束均匀性和有效尖端直径,而不是制造商报告的辐照度。临床决定因素(距离,角度,维护,电池状态和训练)强烈调节输送能量。必须通过控制方案和保护措施来解决热危害和眼危害。集成荧光辅助识别和透照功能以及可互换提示的多功能lcu可能支持诊断和工作流程优化,但独立证据仍然有限。结论:治疗应作为一种可控的能量输送。可靠性取决于辐射暴露,光谱兼容性和光束几何形状,而不是标称辐照度。第三代多波LED lcu似乎是常规实践中最通用的参考选择,特别是当材料的光引发剂系统未知或包含Norrish I型引发剂时。综合诊断和光束整形功能的临床价值仍有待独立验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书