Coronavirus diversity and SARS-CoV-2 exposure at the wildlife-human interface in Northern Italy.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Alessandro Reggiani, Gianluca Rugna, Luca Gelmini, Simone Bariselli, Giovanni Pupillo, Giulia D'Annunzio, Alice Prosperi, Chiara Garbarino, Laura Fiorentini, Simona Perulli, Giulia Maioli, Patrizia Bassi, Silva Rubini, Tiziana Trogu, Ana Maria Moreno Martin, Elena Carra
{"title":"Coronavirus diversity and SARS-CoV-2 exposure at the wildlife-human interface in Northern Italy.","authors":"Alessandro Reggiani, Gianluca Rugna, Luca Gelmini, Simone Bariselli, Giovanni Pupillo, Giulia D'Annunzio, Alice Prosperi, Chiara Garbarino, Laura Fiorentini, Simona Perulli, Giulia Maioli, Patrizia Bassi, Silva Rubini, Tiziana Trogu, Ana Maria Moreno Martin, Elena Carra","doi":"10.1186/s12985-026-03193-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Members of the Coronaviridae family infect humans as well as domestic and wild animals. Over the past three decades, three members of this family, all with zoonotic origins, have caused significant epidemics or pandemics (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19). Despite the spread of SARS-CoV-2 being primarily driven by human-to-human transmission, various animal species are susceptible to infection and may contribute to viral circulation. Aim of this work was to monitor coronavirus (CoV) infections in wild mammals in the Emilia-Romagna region (RER), Italy, using a combined approach of molecular screening for viral RNA detection and serological testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Respiratory and gastrointestinal tissue samples were collected from wild animal carcasses between 2022 and 2024. Samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using two RT-qPCR assays targeting the E and N genes, and for other CoVs using a nested pan-coronavirus RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing of positive samples. Additionally, serum samples obtained from blood, cardiac clot, or thoracic exudate were screened for antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein, with positive samples subsequently confirmed by an ELISA targeting antibodies to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the Spike (S) protein, focused on variants circulating during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Molecular analyses were performed on 2,238 animals, all of which tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, while 90 (79% hedgehogs) tested positive for CoVs. Among these, most sequences were consistent with coronaviruses typically reported in the respective host species. However, some exceptions - such as Betacoronavirus erinacei in fox, porcupine, hare, and roe deer, and EmbeCoV-related sequences in a porcupine - warrant further attention. Suitable serum samples were available from 1,751 animals. Overall, 65 animals tested positive for anti-N antibodies, 31 of which (22 foxes, 4 badgers, 2 hedgehogs, 1 roe deer, 1 wolf, 1 rat) were subsequently confirmed by an anti-RBD ELISA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an overview of CoVs circulation among wild mammals in RER, supporting the role of hedgehogs as reservoirs and identifying some species with evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Certain unexpected findings highlight the need for further investigations to clarify the potential for cross-species transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":23616,"journal":{"name":"Virology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13383500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-026-03193-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Members of the Coronaviridae family infect humans as well as domestic and wild animals. Over the past three decades, three members of this family, all with zoonotic origins, have caused significant epidemics or pandemics (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19). Despite the spread of SARS-CoV-2 being primarily driven by human-to-human transmission, various animal species are susceptible to infection and may contribute to viral circulation. Aim of this work was to monitor coronavirus (CoV) infections in wild mammals in the Emilia-Romagna region (RER), Italy, using a combined approach of molecular screening for viral RNA detection and serological testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Methods: Respiratory and gastrointestinal tissue samples were collected from wild animal carcasses between 2022 and 2024. Samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using two RT-qPCR assays targeting the E and N genes, and for other CoVs using a nested pan-coronavirus RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing of positive samples. Additionally, serum samples obtained from blood, cardiac clot, or thoracic exudate were screened for antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein, with positive samples subsequently confirmed by an ELISA targeting antibodies to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the Spike (S) protein, focused on variants circulating during the study period.

Results: Molecular analyses were performed on 2,238 animals, all of which tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, while 90 (79% hedgehogs) tested positive for CoVs. Among these, most sequences were consistent with coronaviruses typically reported in the respective host species. However, some exceptions - such as Betacoronavirus erinacei in fox, porcupine, hare, and roe deer, and EmbeCoV-related sequences in a porcupine - warrant further attention. Suitable serum samples were available from 1,751 animals. Overall, 65 animals tested positive for anti-N antibodies, 31 of which (22 foxes, 4 badgers, 2 hedgehogs, 1 roe deer, 1 wolf, 1 rat) were subsequently confirmed by an anti-RBD ELISA.

Conclusions: This study provides an overview of CoVs circulation among wild mammals in RER, supporting the role of hedgehogs as reservoirs and identifying some species with evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Certain unexpected findings highlight the need for further investigations to clarify the potential for cross-species transmission.

意大利北部野生动物-人类界面的冠状病毒多样性和SARS-CoV-2暴露
背景:冠状病毒科成员感染人类以及家畜和野生动物。在过去的三十年中,这个家族的三个成员都有人畜共患起源,造成了重大的流行病或大流行(SARS、中东呼吸综合征和COVID-19)。尽管SARS-CoV-2的传播主要是由人与人之间的传播驱动的,但各种动物物种都易受感染,并可能促进病毒循环。本研究的目的是利用分子筛选病毒RNA检测和抗sars -CoV-2抗体血清学检测相结合的方法,监测意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅地区(RER)野生哺乳动物的冠状病毒(CoV)感染。方法:采集2022 ~ 2024年野生动物尸体的呼吸和胃肠道组织样本。采用针对E和N基因的两种RT-qPCR检测SARS-CoV-2,采用巢式泛冠状病毒RT-PCR检测其他冠状病毒,然后对阳性样本进行Sanger测序。此外,从血液、心脏凝块或胸腔渗出液中获得的血清样本进行了针对SARS-CoV-2核衣壳(N)蛋白的抗体筛选,随后通过针对Spike (S)蛋白受体结合域(RBD)抗体的ELISA确认阳性样本,重点关注研究期间循环的变体。结果:对2238只动物进行了分子分析,所有动物的SARS-CoV-2检测均为阴性,而90只(79%的刺猬)的cov检测呈阳性。其中,大多数序列与各自宿主物种中通常报道的冠状病毒一致。然而,一些例外情况——如在狐狸、豪猪、野兔和鹿中发现的倍冠状病毒,以及在豪猪中发现的embecv相关序列——值得进一步关注。从1751只动物中获得了合适的血清样本。总共有65只动物的抗n抗体检测呈阳性,其中31只动物(22只狐狸、4只獾、2只刺猬、1只狍子、1只狼和1只大鼠)随后通过抗rbd ELISA检测得到证实。结论:本研究概述了内河流域野生哺乳动物中冠状病毒的传播,支持刺猬作为宿主的作用,并确定了一些有暴露于SARS-CoV-2证据的物种。某些意想不到的发现强调需要进一步调查以澄清跨物种传播的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Virology Journal
Virology Journal 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
186
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Virology Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of virology, including research on the viruses of animals, plants and microbes. The journal welcomes basic research as well as pre-clinical and clinical studies of novel diagnostic tools, vaccines and anti-viral therapies. The Editorial policy of Virology Journal is to publish all research which is assessed by peer reviewers to be a coherent and sound addition to the scientific literature, and puts less emphasis on interest levels or perceived impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书