An evolutionary approach to privacy and information-management psychology.

IF 2.1 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Evolutionary Human Sciences Pub Date : 2026-05-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ehs.2026.10051
Sophie Elizabeth Klitgaard, Daniel M T Fessler
{"title":"An evolutionary approach to privacy and information-management psychology.","authors":"Sophie Elizabeth Klitgaard, Daniel M T Fessler","doi":"10.1017/ehs.2026.10051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current debates concerning the use of digital technology often focus on privacy, yet privacy attitudes and behaviour are remarkably under-theorized, and relatively little empirical research has investigated privacy beyond the realm of digital communications. Building on evolutionary scholarship on information exchange, we outline a theoretical model in which cultural concepts of privacy reflect the workings of evolved psychological mechanisms that aim to regulate others' access to fitness-relevant information towards adaptive ends. Results of two initial U.S. vignette studies distributed via Prolific (<i>n</i> = 425, 120) support the core predictions of this model, suggesting that people may have implicit and unstated assumptions regarding how information spreads in social environments. Specifically, participants' privacy evaluations were predicted by whether information was intentionally acquired, the extent to which information was transmitted, and an individual's position in an information transfer event. Importantly, how information was acquired and the nature of its transmission constituted independent but interacting influences on privacy perceptions. Additionally, results suggest the location within shared social networks of the individual to whom information is transmitted is used as a proxy for the potential costs of dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":36414,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","volume":"8 ","pages":"e21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13184659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2026.10051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current debates concerning the use of digital technology often focus on privacy, yet privacy attitudes and behaviour are remarkably under-theorized, and relatively little empirical research has investigated privacy beyond the realm of digital communications. Building on evolutionary scholarship on information exchange, we outline a theoretical model in which cultural concepts of privacy reflect the workings of evolved psychological mechanisms that aim to regulate others' access to fitness-relevant information towards adaptive ends. Results of two initial U.S. vignette studies distributed via Prolific (n = 425, 120) support the core predictions of this model, suggesting that people may have implicit and unstated assumptions regarding how information spreads in social environments. Specifically, participants' privacy evaluations were predicted by whether information was intentionally acquired, the extent to which information was transmitted, and an individual's position in an information transfer event. Importantly, how information was acquired and the nature of its transmission constituted independent but interacting influences on privacy perceptions. Additionally, results suggest the location within shared social networks of the individual to whom information is transmitted is used as a proxy for the potential costs of dissemination.

隐私和信息管理心理学的进化方法。
目前关于数字技术使用的争论往往集中在隐私上,但隐私态度和行为的理论化程度明显不足,而且相对较少的实证研究调查了数字通信领域之外的隐私。在信息交换的进化学术基础上,我们概述了一个理论模型,其中隐私的文化概念反映了进化的心理机制的运作,旨在调节他人对健康相关信息的获取,以达到适应性目的。通过多产发表的两项美国初步研究结果(n = 425,120)支持该模型的核心预测,表明人们可能对信息在社会环境中的传播方式有隐含的和未陈述的假设。具体而言,参与者的隐私评估通过信息是否被有意获取、信息传播的程度以及个人在信息传递事件中的位置来预测。重要的是,信息的获取方式及其传播的性质构成了对隐私感知的独立但相互作用的影响。此外,研究结果表明,信息被传递给的个人在共享社交网络中的位置可以作为传播潜在成本的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Evolutionary Human Sciences Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书