Association between VA providers' reported use of care strategies and emergence delirium: a national retrospective cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Monique Y Boudreaux-Kelly, Matthew A Taylor, William M Pileggi, Michael J Boland, David V Julian, Amanda K Beckstead
{"title":"Association between VA providers' reported use of care strategies and emergence delirium: a national retrospective cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Monique Y Boudreaux-Kelly, Matthew A Taylor, William M Pileggi, Michael J Boland, David V Julian, Amanda K Beckstead","doi":"10.1186/s13741-026-00700-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergence delirium (ED) is a short-term behavioral condition associated with risk of harm that may occur when a patient awakens from anesthesia. A national survey was conducted to evaluate our hypothesis that Veterans Health Administration (VHA) anesthesia providers who reported routinely screening patients for ED risk and selecting medication strategies associated with lower ED risk would be less likely to report estimated ED occurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional self-report survey was designed by staff at Veterans Affairs' Pittsburgh Healthcare System (PHS) and launched nationally to VHA anesthesia providers. The survey was conducted after an intervention at PHS to increase routine patient screening for ED risk and use of the \"exact medication\" strategy promoted by the intervention regardless of location: administration of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine and avoidance of midazolam and volatile anesthetics. Comparisons of percentage of PHS and non-PHS anesthesia providers who reported use of the \"exact medication\" strategy and estimated ED occurrence were analyzed using tests of independence and multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on survey data from 690 VHA anesthesia providers (PHS n = 34, non-PHS n = 656), both routine screening (PHS: 88.2%, non-PHS: 58.4%, p < 0.001) and the \"exact medication\" strategy (PHS: 44.1%, non-PHS: 1.4%, p < 0.001) were reported by more PHS than non-PHS providers. Survey results indicated 37.3% more providers at PHS (38.2%, n = 13) reported using the \"routine screening plus exact medication\" strategy than non-PHS (0.9%, n = 6, p < 0.001) and providers who used that care strategy were less likely to report estimated ED occurrence (PHS: 46% vs non-PHS: 50%, p < 0.05). Using multivariable modeling analysis, the \"routine screening plus exact medication\" care strategy was associated with lower odds of estimated ED occurrence regardless of location (OR = 0.36, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bivariate comparisons and multivariable adjusted modeling of survey findings supported our hypothesis that providers who reported routinely screening patients for ED risk and employing the \"exact medication\" strategy were less likely to have estimated ED occurrence. Use of these descriptive analyses to generate hypotheses for future assessments is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13459256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00700-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergence delirium (ED) is a short-term behavioral condition associated with risk of harm that may occur when a patient awakens from anesthesia. A national survey was conducted to evaluate our hypothesis that Veterans Health Administration (VHA) anesthesia providers who reported routinely screening patients for ED risk and selecting medication strategies associated with lower ED risk would be less likely to report estimated ED occurrence.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional self-report survey was designed by staff at Veterans Affairs' Pittsburgh Healthcare System (PHS) and launched nationally to VHA anesthesia providers. The survey was conducted after an intervention at PHS to increase routine patient screening for ED risk and use of the "exact medication" strategy promoted by the intervention regardless of location: administration of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine and avoidance of midazolam and volatile anesthetics. Comparisons of percentage of PHS and non-PHS anesthesia providers who reported use of the "exact medication" strategy and estimated ED occurrence were analyzed using tests of independence and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: Based on survey data from 690 VHA anesthesia providers (PHS n = 34, non-PHS n = 656), both routine screening (PHS: 88.2%, non-PHS: 58.4%, p < 0.001) and the "exact medication" strategy (PHS: 44.1%, non-PHS: 1.4%, p < 0.001) were reported by more PHS than non-PHS providers. Survey results indicated 37.3% more providers at PHS (38.2%, n = 13) reported using the "routine screening plus exact medication" strategy than non-PHS (0.9%, n = 6, p < 0.001) and providers who used that care strategy were less likely to report estimated ED occurrence (PHS: 46% vs non-PHS: 50%, p < 0.05). Using multivariable modeling analysis, the "routine screening plus exact medication" care strategy was associated with lower odds of estimated ED occurrence regardless of location (OR = 0.36, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Bivariate comparisons and multivariable adjusted modeling of survey findings supported our hypothesis that providers who reported routinely screening patients for ED risk and employing the "exact medication" strategy were less likely to have estimated ED occurrence. Use of these descriptive analyses to generate hypotheses for future assessments is recommended.

VA提供者报告的护理策略使用与紧急谵妄之间的关系:一项全国性回顾性横断面调查。
背景:突发性谵妄(ED)是一种短期行为状态,与患者从麻醉中醒来时可能发生的伤害风险相关。我们进行了一项全国调查,以评估我们的假设,即退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)麻醉提供者报告常规筛查患者ED风险并选择与降低ED风险相关的药物策略的可能性较小。方法:退伍军人事务部匹兹堡医疗保健系统(PHS)的工作人员设计了一项回顾性横断面自我报告调查,并在全国范围内向VHA麻醉提供者发起调查。这项调查是在PHS进行干预后进行的,以增加对ED风险的常规筛查,并使用干预所提倡的“精确用药”策略,无论地点:给予异丙酚、右美托咪定和氯胺酮,避免咪达唑仑和挥发性麻醉剂。使用独立性检验和多变量logistic回归模型对报告使用“精确用药”策略的小灵通和非小灵通麻醉提供者的百分比和ED发生率进行了分析。结果:基于690名VHA麻醉提供者的调查数据(PHS n = 34,非PHS n = 656),常规筛查(PHS: 88.2%,非PHS: 58.4%)。结论:调查结果的双变量比较和多变量调整模型支持我们的假设,即报告常规筛查患者ED风险并采用“精确用药”策略的提供者估计ED发生的可能性较小。建议使用这些描述性分析来产生未来评估的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书