Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation for persistent pain state in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Stephanie Pilotti, Lucas Denardi Dória, Maria Luisa Gasparini, Natália Garcia Dos Santos, Barbara Regina França, André Luiz Silveira Mallmann, André Lucas Ribeiro, Leonardo Peterson Dos Santos, Daniel Nóbrega de Moraes, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Espírito Santo, Claiton Viegas Brenol, Iraci L S Torres, Wolnei Caumo, Ricardo Machado Xavier
{"title":"Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation for persistent pain state in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial.","authors":"Stephanie Pilotti, Lucas Denardi Dória, Maria Luisa Gasparini, Natália Garcia Dos Santos, Barbara Regina França, André Luiz Silveira Mallmann, André Lucas Ribeiro, Leonardo Peterson Dos Santos, Daniel Nóbrega de Moraes, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Espírito Santo, Claiton Viegas Brenol, Iraci L S Torres, Wolnei Caumo, Ricardo Machado Xavier","doi":"10.1186/s42358-026-00535-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although effectively controlling inflammation, up to 50% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience persistent pain, associated with central sensitization and neuroinflammation. Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown efficacy in chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) is more effective than sham stimulation in reducing pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with 34 women (18-70 years) with RA and VAS > 40 mm. Participants were randomized to receive a-tDCS (n = 17) or sham tDCS (n = 17). Home-based tDCS (2 mA, 20 min/day) or sham (2 mA, 90 s) for four weeks, using anodal-left M1 montage. Primary outcomes was pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), Secondary outcomes included pressure pain threshold (PPT), central sensitization (CSI), physical function (HAQ-DI), fatigue (FACIT-F), CNS biomarkers, adherence, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean VAS reduction from baseline was greater in the a-tDCS group (-33.5 mm) versus s-tDCS (-14.1 mm), with a between-group difference of -19.4 mm (95% CI, -29.3 to -9.5; p = 0.003). Linear mixed-effects models showed that a-tDCS reduced VAS pain by 27.7% versus 6.0% with sham, a between-group difference of 21.7% (Cohen's d = 1.15). HAQ-DI improved by 38.0% versus 7.2% (ES = 1.10). a-tDCS reduced analgesic use by 62% (RR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79). Exploratory analyses suggested that neuroplasticity mechanisms might mediate these effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home-based a-tDCS effectively reduced pain, disability, and analgesic use in RA patients with persistent pain without objective inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13488835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-026-00535-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although effectively controlling inflammation, up to 50% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience persistent pain, associated with central sensitization and neuroinflammation. Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown efficacy in chronic pain.

Objective: To investigate whether anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) is more effective than sham stimulation in reducing pain.

Methods: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with 34 women (18-70 years) with RA and VAS > 40 mm. Participants were randomized to receive a-tDCS (n = 17) or sham tDCS (n = 17). Home-based tDCS (2 mA, 20 min/day) or sham (2 mA, 90 s) for four weeks, using anodal-left M1 montage. Primary outcomes was pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), Secondary outcomes included pressure pain threshold (PPT), central sensitization (CSI), physical function (HAQ-DI), fatigue (FACIT-F), CNS biomarkers, adherence, and safety.

Results: Mean VAS reduction from baseline was greater in the a-tDCS group (-33.5 mm) versus s-tDCS (-14.1 mm), with a between-group difference of -19.4 mm (95% CI, -29.3 to -9.5; p = 0.003). Linear mixed-effects models showed that a-tDCS reduced VAS pain by 27.7% versus 6.0% with sham, a between-group difference of 21.7% (Cohen's d = 1.15). HAQ-DI improved by 38.0% versus 7.2% (ES = 1.10). a-tDCS reduced analgesic use by 62% (RR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79). Exploratory analyses suggested that neuroplasticity mechanisms might mediate these effects.

Conclusion: Home-based a-tDCS effectively reduced pain, disability, and analgesic use in RA patients with persistent pain without objective inflammation.

基于家庭的经颅直流电刺激治疗类风湿性关节炎持续疼痛状态:一项随机试验。
背景:虽然可以有效控制炎症,但高达50%的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者经历持续疼痛,与中枢致敏和神经炎症相关。基于家庭的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已显示出对慢性疼痛的疗效。目的:探讨负极tDCS (a-tDCS)是否比假刺激更有效地减轻疼痛。方法:随机、双盲、假对照试验34例RA患者,年龄18 ~ 70岁,VAS > ~ 40mm。参与者随机接受a-tDCS (n = 17)或假tDCS (n = 17)。基于家庭的tDCS (2 mA, 20分钟/天)或假手术(2 mA, 90秒)4周,使用左负极M1蒙太奇。主要结果是疼痛(视觉模拟量表,VAS),次要结果包括压痛阈值(PPT)、中枢致敏(CSI)、身体功能(HAQ-DI)、疲劳(FACIT-F)、中枢神经系统生物标志物、依从性和安全性。结果:a- tdcs组(-33.5 mm)比s-tDCS组(-14.1 mm)平均VAS较基线降低更大,组间差异为-19.4 mm (95% CI, -29.3至-9.5;p = 0.003)。线性混合效应模型显示,a- tdcs减少VAS疼痛27.7%,而假手术组为6.0%,组间差异为21.7% (Cohen’s d = 1.15)。HAQ-DI分别改善了38.0%和7.2% (ES = 1.10)。a-tDCS使镇痛药的使用减少62% (RR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79)。探索性分析表明,神经可塑性机制可能介导了这些作用。结论:基于家庭的a-tDCS有效地减少了无客观炎症的持续性疼痛RA患者的疼痛、残疾和止痛药的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Rheumatology
Advances in Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication. Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书