Real-world benchmarks for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-center analysis of two standard immunotherapy pathways in Romania.

Q2 Medicine
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-30 DOI:10.15386/mpr-2925
Daniel-Vasile Dulf, Anamaria Larisa Burnar, Doina-Ramona Matei, Patricia-Lorena Dulf, Raluca Maria Hendea, Cătălina Bungărdean, Andreea Hopârtean, Dinu Bolunduţ, Iulia Andras, Maximilian Buzoianu, Nicoale Crişan, Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu, Camelia Alexandra Coadă
{"title":"Real-world benchmarks for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-center analysis of two standard immunotherapy pathways in Romania.","authors":"Daniel-Vasile Dulf, Anamaria Larisa Burnar, Doina-Ramona Matei, Patricia-Lorena Dulf, Raluca Maria Hendea, Cătălina Bungărdean, Andreea Hopârtean, Dinu Bolunduţ, Iulia Andras, Maximilian Buzoianu, Nicoale Crişan, Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu, Camelia Alexandra Coadă","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish a real-world benchmark for treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) by analyzing two distinct, standard-of-care therapeutic sequences at a single Romanian tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with mUC treated between January 1, 2020, and April 30, 2025. Patients were analyzed in two clinically distinct cohorts: the Avelumab Maintenance Cohort (N=12), which included platinum-eligible patients who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab maintenance, and the Pembrolizumab Cohort (N=18), consisting of patients who received pembrolizumab therapy following disease progression after PBC. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two cohorts displayed different baseline characteristics and clinical trajectories. The Avelumab Maintenance cohort, selected for chemotherapy-sensitive disease, demonstrated a higher disease control rate (DCR) of 91.7%. The Pembrolizumab cohort, representing a more clinically diverse and challenging population, had a DCR of 55.6%. In the Avelumab cohort, median TTF and median OS were not reached. In the Pembrolizumab cohort, the median TTF was 10.2 months and median OS was 21.8 months. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were infrequent, occurring in 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) in the Avelumab cohort and 2 of 18 patients (11.1%) in the Pembrolizumab cohort, with no new safety signals identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This single-center study provides a context-specific presentation of mUC treated with ICIs effectiveness and safety in the Romanian healthcare context and highlights the impact of systemic factors, such as national healthcare reimbursement policies, on clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":"99 2","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13186310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To establish a real-world benchmark for treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) by analyzing two distinct, standard-of-care therapeutic sequences at a single Romanian tertiary care center.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with mUC treated between January 1, 2020, and April 30, 2025. Patients were analyzed in two clinically distinct cohorts: the Avelumab Maintenance Cohort (N=12), which included platinum-eligible patients who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab maintenance, and the Pembrolizumab Cohort (N=18), consisting of patients who received pembrolizumab therapy following disease progression after PBC. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Results: The two cohorts displayed different baseline characteristics and clinical trajectories. The Avelumab Maintenance cohort, selected for chemotherapy-sensitive disease, demonstrated a higher disease control rate (DCR) of 91.7%. The Pembrolizumab cohort, representing a more clinically diverse and challenging population, had a DCR of 55.6%. In the Avelumab cohort, median TTF and median OS were not reached. In the Pembrolizumab cohort, the median TTF was 10.2 months and median OS was 21.8 months. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were infrequent, occurring in 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) in the Avelumab cohort and 2 of 18 patients (11.1%) in the Pembrolizumab cohort, with no new safety signals identified.

Conclusion: This single-center study provides a context-specific presentation of mUC treated with ICIs effectiveness and safety in the Romanian healthcare context and highlights the impact of systemic factors, such as national healthcare reimbursement policies, on clinical practice.

转移性尿路上皮癌的真实世界基准:罗马尼亚两种标准免疫治疗途径的单中心分析。
目的:通过分析罗马尼亚三级保健中心的两种不同的标准治疗序列,为转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)患者的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗和临床结果建立一个现实世界的基准。方法:我们对2020年1月1日至2025年4月30日期间治疗的30例mUC患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为两个临床不同的队列进行分析:Avelumab维持队列(N=12),其中包括对一线铂基化疗(PBC)有反应的铂类患者,随后进行Avelumab维持;Pembrolizumab队列(N=18),包括PBC后疾病进展后接受Pembrolizumab治疗的患者。主要终点是治疗失败时间(TTF)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的发生率。结果:两个队列显示不同的基线特征和临床轨迹。Avelumab维持队列,选择用于化疗敏感疾病,显示出更高的疾病控制率(DCR)为91.7%。Pembrolizumab队列代表了一个更具临床多样性和挑战性的人群,DCR为55.6%。在Avelumab队列中,未达到中位TTF和中位OS。在Pembrolizumab队列中,中位TTF为10.2个月,中位OS为21.8个月。≥3级trae并不常见,Avelumab组12例患者中有1例(8.3%)发生,Pembrolizumab组18例患者中有2例(11.1%)发生,未发现新的安全性信号。结论:这项单中心研究提供了在罗马尼亚医疗保健背景下使用ICIs治疗mUC的有效性和安全性的具体情况,并强调了系统因素(如国家医疗保健报销政策)对临床实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书