Integrated and Ayurveda standalone interventions compared with standalone modern care in Rheumatoid arthritis: Observations from a non-random, parallel group, open label, historical control study

IF 2.1 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Sanjeev Rastogi, Krishna Gopal Sharma, Gurmeet Ram
{"title":"Integrated and Ayurveda standalone interventions compared with standalone modern care in Rheumatoid arthritis: Observations from a non-random, parallel group, open label, historical control study","authors":"Sanjeev Rastogi,&nbsp;Krishna Gopal Sharma,&nbsp;Gurmeet Ram","doi":"10.1016/j.jaim.2025.101299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rheumatoid arthritis patients frequently visit Ayurveda clinics. Many such patients arrive at Ayurveda clinics after getting a trial of conventional modern medicine and being unsatisfied with the responses. In real world setting, many of these patients prefer to continue modern medicine along with Ayurveda interventions. This patient pool forms a very specific population of RA.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study was aiming at observing the benefits of adding Ayurveda interventions to ongoing modern medicine or Ayurveda alone intervention in those who preferred to stop modern medicine.</div></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><div>It was a non-random, single center, parallel group, open label, historical control observational study where the past modern intervention was taken up as the historical control for all those who continued with Ayurveda alone or integrated intervention. The outcome assessment was done on the basis of Swollen Joint count, Tender joint count, VAS score, Patient Global Assessment, ESR and DAS-28. Both intergroup and intragroup comparison of all parameters was done.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>31 patients who were included in the study (17 in Ayurveda alone group and 14 in integrated management group) were compared for all outcomes within the group and also for inter group. These observations were also compared with historical control. Except historical control, both active intervention groups were found to have statistically significant improvements in pre-post analysis. An intergroup comparison was not able to find any significant difference except for DAS-28 which was found significantly different in three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ayurveda interventions in RA are found to be more effective comparing to modern interventions alone observed through historical control. Integrative management of RA comprising of Ayurveda and modern standard care is only marginally better than Ayurveda alone and is much better than modern alone intervention in RA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 101299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0975947625001755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis patients frequently visit Ayurveda clinics. Many such patients arrive at Ayurveda clinics after getting a trial of conventional modern medicine and being unsatisfied with the responses. In real world setting, many of these patients prefer to continue modern medicine along with Ayurveda interventions. This patient pool forms a very specific population of RA.

Objective

The study was aiming at observing the benefits of adding Ayurveda interventions to ongoing modern medicine or Ayurveda alone intervention in those who preferred to stop modern medicine.

Material and method

It was a non-random, single center, parallel group, open label, historical control observational study where the past modern intervention was taken up as the historical control for all those who continued with Ayurveda alone or integrated intervention. The outcome assessment was done on the basis of Swollen Joint count, Tender joint count, VAS score, Patient Global Assessment, ESR and DAS-28. Both intergroup and intragroup comparison of all parameters was done.

Results

31 patients who were included in the study (17 in Ayurveda alone group and 14 in integrated management group) were compared for all outcomes within the group and also for inter group. These observations were also compared with historical control. Except historical control, both active intervention groups were found to have statistically significant improvements in pre-post analysis. An intergroup comparison was not able to find any significant difference except for DAS-28 which was found significantly different in three groups.

Conclusion

Ayurveda interventions in RA are found to be more effective comparing to modern interventions alone observed through historical control. Integrative management of RA comprising of Ayurveda and modern standard care is only marginally better than Ayurveda alone and is much better than modern alone intervention in RA.
综合干预和阿育吠陀独立干预与独立现代护理在类风湿关节炎中的比较:来自非随机、平行组、开放标签、历史对照研究的观察结果
背景:类风湿性关节炎患者经常到阿育吠陀诊所就诊。许多这样的病人在接受了传统现代医学的试验后,对疗效不满意,于是来到阿育吠陀诊所。在现实世界中,这些患者中的许多人更喜欢在阿育吠陀干预的同时继续使用现代医学。这些患者形成了一个非常特殊的类风湿关节炎人群。目的:该研究旨在观察在正在进行的现代医学中加入阿育吠陀干预或单独阿育吠陀干预对那些倾向于停止现代医学的人的益处。材料和方法:这是一项非随机、单中心、平行组、开放标签、历史对照观察性研究,将过去的现代干预作为所有继续接受阿育吠陀单独或综合干预的人的历史对照。根据肿胀关节计数、压痛关节计数、VAS评分、患者整体评估、ESR和DAS-28进行结局评估。各组间及组内各参数比较。结果:31例纳入研究的患者(单独阿育吠陀治疗组17例,综合治疗组14例)对组内和组间的所有结果进行了比较。这些观察结果也与历史对照进行了比较。除历史对照组外,两个积极干预组在前后分析中均有统计学显著改善。除DAS-28在三组间差异显著外,组间比较均无显著差异。结论:通过历史对照观察,阿育吠陀对RA的干预比单独的现代干预更有效。由阿育吠陀和现代标准治疗组成的RA综合管理仅略好于阿育吠陀单独治疗,而远好于现代单独干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
136
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书