Less is more: A single-dose, non-waiting neoadjuvant immunotherapy strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma

IF 6.3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Biomedical Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.bj.2026.100994
Kevin Kuan-Yu Chen, Tzu-Jung Lin, Te-Wei Su, Po-Da Chen, Ming-Chih Ho, Yao-Ming Wu, Ying-Chun Shen, Ann-Lii Cheng
{"title":"Less is more: A single-dose, non-waiting neoadjuvant immunotherapy strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Kevin Kuan-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Tzu-Jung Lin,&nbsp;Te-Wei Su,&nbsp;Po-Da Chen,&nbsp;Ming-Chih Ho,&nbsp;Yao-Ming Wu,&nbsp;Ying-Chun Shen,&nbsp;Ann-Lii Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2026.100994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being explored in multiple solid tumors, conventionally delivered as multi-cycle preoperative regimens or as part of perioperative strategies that include postoperative therapy. However, directly adopting these approaches presents distinct challenges in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the Asia-Pacific region, curative surgery remains feasible even for patients with a large tumor burden. These patients may derive the greatest benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy due to their high risk of recurrence, yet they also face the narrowest surgical window. Disease progression during prolonged neoadjuvant treatment period can easily hinder resectability. Additionally, intensive neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events, especially hepatotoxicity, may delay surgery. A HCC-specific approach that prioritizes surgical feasibility while preserving benefit of immunotherapy is needed.</div><div>Recent pharmacodynamic and clinical evidence indicates that a single dose of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) antibody can rapidly achieve near-complete receptor occupancy and early T-cell activation. Receptor occupancy can be sustained in the early postoperative period. This provides a strong scientific rationale for a <strong>single-dose, non-waiting neoadjuvant strategy</strong>, in which anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 is administered shortly before surgery without delaying resection. Such an approach may allow early antitumor immune activation while minimizing treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), preserving surgical feasibility and reducing logistical complexity. It may enhance acceptance among patients and surgeons. Future neoadjuvant trials in HCC should consider adopting this “less is more” paradigm to investigate whether abbreviated neoadjuvant immunotherapy can safely translate immunologic activation into meaningful clinical benefit, as measured by event-free survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":"49 4","pages":"Article 100994"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2319417026000508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being explored in multiple solid tumors, conventionally delivered as multi-cycle preoperative regimens or as part of perioperative strategies that include postoperative therapy. However, directly adopting these approaches presents distinct challenges in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the Asia-Pacific region, curative surgery remains feasible even for patients with a large tumor burden. These patients may derive the greatest benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy due to their high risk of recurrence, yet they also face the narrowest surgical window. Disease progression during prolonged neoadjuvant treatment period can easily hinder resectability. Additionally, intensive neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events, especially hepatotoxicity, may delay surgery. A HCC-specific approach that prioritizes surgical feasibility while preserving benefit of immunotherapy is needed.
Recent pharmacodynamic and clinical evidence indicates that a single dose of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) antibody can rapidly achieve near-complete receptor occupancy and early T-cell activation. Receptor occupancy can be sustained in the early postoperative period. This provides a strong scientific rationale for a single-dose, non-waiting neoadjuvant strategy, in which anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 is administered shortly before surgery without delaying resection. Such an approach may allow early antitumor immune activation while minimizing treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), preserving surgical feasibility and reducing logistical complexity. It may enhance acceptance among patients and surgeons. Future neoadjuvant trials in HCC should consider adopting this “less is more” paradigm to investigate whether abbreviated neoadjuvant immunotherapy can safely translate immunologic activation into meaningful clinical benefit, as measured by event-free survival.
少即是多:肝细胞癌的单剂量、非等待新辅助免疫治疗策略。
新辅助免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在多发性实体肿瘤中的应用越来越多,通常作为多周期术前方案或作为包括术后治疗在内的围手术期策略的一部分。然而,直接采用这些方法在肝细胞癌(HCC)中存在明显的挑战。在亚太地区,即使对于肿瘤负担很大的患者,治疗性手术仍然是可行的。由于复发风险高,这些患者可能从新辅助免疫治疗中获益最大,但他们也面临着最狭窄的手术窗口。在延长的新辅助治疗期间,疾病进展很容易妨碍可切除性。此外,与新辅助治疗相关的严重不良事件,特别是肝毒性,可能会延迟手术。需要一种hcc特异性方法,优先考虑手术可行性,同时保留免疫治疗的益处。最近的药效学和临床证据表明,单剂量的程序性细胞死亡-1 (PD-1)或其配体(PD-L1)抗体可以迅速实现受体的几乎完全占用和早期t细胞活化。术后早期受体占据可以持续。这为单剂量、非等待新辅助策略提供了强有力的科学依据,其中抗pd -1或抗pd - l1在手术前不久施用,不会延迟切除。这种方法可能允许早期抗肿瘤免疫激活,同时最大限度地减少治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs),保持手术可行性并降低后勤复杂性。它可能会提高患者和外科医生的接受度。未来HCC的新辅助试验应考虑采用“少即是多”的模式,以无事件生存期为衡量标准,研究缩短的新辅助免疫治疗是否可以安全地将免疫激活转化为有意义的临床获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书