Fetal growth-guided management of gestational diabetes: A retrospective cohort study on insulin requirements and perinatal outcomes

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2026-05-21 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1007/s00404-026-08467-3
Serena Xodo, Andrea Da Porto, Maria De Martino, Annalaura Del Pin, Asia Flaiban, Silvia Galasso, Sara Piccini, Lorenza Driul
{"title":"Fetal growth-guided management of gestational diabetes: A retrospective cohort study on insulin requirements and perinatal outcomes","authors":"Serena Xodo,&nbsp;Andrea Da Porto,&nbsp;Maria De Martino,&nbsp;Annalaura Del Pin,&nbsp;Asia Flaiban,&nbsp;Silvia Galasso,&nbsp;Sara Piccini,&nbsp;Lorenza Driul","doi":"10.1007/s00404-026-08467-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate whether a fetal growth-guided management strategy can reduce treatment intensity without compromising maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching was conducted at a single tertiary referral center and included 343 women with GDM diagnosed after a second-trimester OGTT, of whom 244 were included in the matched analysis. Participants were managed either with a fetal growth-guided approach, in which glycemic targets and insulin therapy were tailored according to fetal abdominal circumference (AC), or with standard glycemia-based care. In the growth-guided group, stricter targets were applied when AC exceeded the 70th percentile. Outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and after matching. Primary outcomes were insulin use and glycemic control. Secondary outcomes included maternal weight gain, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes such as birthweight, Apgar score, cord blood pH, and size for gestational age.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the overall cohort, fetal growth-guided management was associated with lower birthweight (3470 g vs 3544 g; p = 0.036), reduced basal insulin use (58% vs 83%; p &lt; 0.001), lower total insulin dose at delivery (9 vs 18 IU; p &lt; 0.001), and slightly improved glycemic control. After propensity score matching, basal insulin use (65% vs 80%; p = 0.029) remained lower, while glycemic control, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes were comparable. The sensitivity analysis restricted to insulin-treated patients ahowed no significant differences between the differently managed groups of patients.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A fetal growth-guided approach to GDM management reduces insulin requirements without worsening maternal or neonatal outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-026-08467-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-026-08467-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether a fetal growth-guided management strategy can reduce treatment intensity without compromising maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching was conducted at a single tertiary referral center and included 343 women with GDM diagnosed after a second-trimester OGTT, of whom 244 were included in the matched analysis. Participants were managed either with a fetal growth-guided approach, in which glycemic targets and insulin therapy were tailored according to fetal abdominal circumference (AC), or with standard glycemia-based care. In the growth-guided group, stricter targets were applied when AC exceeded the 70th percentile. Outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and after matching. Primary outcomes were insulin use and glycemic control. Secondary outcomes included maternal weight gain, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes such as birthweight, Apgar score, cord blood pH, and size for gestational age.

Results

In the overall cohort, fetal growth-guided management was associated with lower birthweight (3470 g vs 3544 g; p = 0.036), reduced basal insulin use (58% vs 83%; p < 0.001), lower total insulin dose at delivery (9 vs 18 IU; p < 0.001), and slightly improved glycemic control. After propensity score matching, basal insulin use (65% vs 80%; p = 0.029) remained lower, while glycemic control, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes were comparable. The sensitivity analysis restricted to insulin-treated patients ahowed no significant differences between the differently managed groups of patients.

Conclusions

A fetal growth-guided approach to GDM management reduces insulin requirements without worsening maternal or neonatal outcomes.

胎儿生长引导的妊娠期糖尿病管理:胰岛素需求和围产期结局的回顾性队列研究。
目的:评估以胎儿生长为导向的管理策略是否可以在不影响妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)妇女的孕产妇和新生儿结局的情况下降低治疗强度。方法:采用倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究在单一三级转诊中心进行,纳入343例妊娠中期OGTT后诊断为GDM的妇女,其中244例纳入匹配分析。参与者要么接受胎儿生长引导方法,根据胎儿腹围(AC)量身定制血糖目标和胰岛素治疗,要么接受标准的血糖基础护理。在生长引导组,当AC超过70百分位时,采用更严格的目标。对整个队列和配对后的结果进行分析。主要结局是胰岛素使用和血糖控制。次要结局包括产妇体重增加、产科结局和新生儿结局,如出生体重、阿普加评分、脐带血pH值和胎龄大小。结果:在整个队列中,胎儿生长引导管理与较低的出生体重(3470 g对3544 g; p = 0.036),减少基础胰岛素使用(58%对83%;p结论:胎儿生长引导方法用于GDM管理可降低胰岛素需求,而不会恶化孕产妇或新生儿结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书