Treatment of brucellosis in pregnant women: a systematic review and analysis of current gaps and future perspectives.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Endi Lanza Galvão, Diêgo Mendes Xavier, Glaciele Maria de Souza, Gláucia Cota, Sarah Nascimento Silva
{"title":"Treatment of brucellosis in pregnant women: a systematic review and analysis of current gaps and future perspectives.","authors":"Endi Lanza Galvão, Diêgo Mendes Xavier, Glaciele Maria de Souza, Gláucia Cota, Sarah Nascimento Silva","doi":"10.1590/S1678-9946202668032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human brucellosis is a globally prevalent bacterial disease with significant implications during pregnancy due to obstetric complications. Despite the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, the lack of therapeutic consensus and robust evidence underscores the need for systematic evaluation to guide clinical practice. This study systematically reviewed the literature to identify and summarize available drug therapy options for brucellosis in pregnant women, focusing on efficacy, safety, and obstetric outcomes. The review followed PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and gray literature for references indexed up to September 15, 2025. Eligible studies reported therapeutic interventions in pregnant women with brucellosis. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool, and data on participants, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Of 737 records screened, six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising retrospective and prospective reports published between 1991 and 2020, totaling 403 pregnant women. Therapeutic regimens varied, with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) plus rifampicin being the most frequently used combination. Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with this regimen occurred in 16% (95%CI: 8%-30%) of cases. Overall, abortion occurred in 94 (23.3%) women, 20 preterm births were reported, and 10 newborns had low birth weight. Recurrence was observed in only 3% of cases. Heterogeneity in outcomes and definitions limited comparability. In conclusion, there is no standardized treatment for brucellosis during pregnancy. Adverse obstetric outcomes remain frequent, highlighting the need for controlled studies to establish safe and effective therapeutic protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":54466,"journal":{"name":"Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De Sao Paulo","volume":"68 ","pages":"e32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13185525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946202668032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human brucellosis is a globally prevalent bacterial disease with significant implications during pregnancy due to obstetric complications. Despite the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, the lack of therapeutic consensus and robust evidence underscores the need for systematic evaluation to guide clinical practice. This study systematically reviewed the literature to identify and summarize available drug therapy options for brucellosis in pregnant women, focusing on efficacy, safety, and obstetric outcomes. The review followed PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and gray literature for references indexed up to September 15, 2025. Eligible studies reported therapeutic interventions in pregnant women with brucellosis. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool, and data on participants, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Of 737 records screened, six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising retrospective and prospective reports published between 1991 and 2020, totaling 403 pregnant women. Therapeutic regimens varied, with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) plus rifampicin being the most frequently used combination. Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with this regimen occurred in 16% (95%CI: 8%-30%) of cases. Overall, abortion occurred in 94 (23.3%) women, 20 preterm births were reported, and 10 newborns had low birth weight. Recurrence was observed in only 3% of cases. Heterogeneity in outcomes and definitions limited comparability. In conclusion, there is no standardized treatment for brucellosis during pregnancy. Adverse obstetric outcomes remain frequent, highlighting the need for controlled studies to establish safe and effective therapeutic protocols.

孕妇布鲁氏菌病的治疗:对当前差距和未来前景的系统回顾和分析。
人布鲁氏菌病是一种全球流行的细菌性疾病,由于产科并发症,在妊娠期间具有重大影响。尽管早期诊断和治疗很重要,但缺乏治疗共识和强有力的证据强调了系统评估以指导临床实践的必要性。本研究系统地回顾了文献,以确定和总结孕妇布鲁氏菌病的现有药物治疗方案,重点关注疗效、安全性和产科结局。该评价遵循PRISMA和Cochrane手册指南。在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、LILACS和灰色文献中检索索引至2025年9月15日的参考文献。符合条件的研究报告了布鲁氏菌病孕妇的治疗干预措施。使用JBI关键评估工具评估偏倚风险,并提取参与者、干预措施和结果的数据。在筛选的737项记录中,有6项研究符合纳入标准,包括1991年至2020年间发表的回顾性和前瞻性报告,共有403名孕妇。治疗方案多种多样,磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶(SMX-TMP)加利福平是最常用的组合。与该方案相关的不良产科结局发生率为16% (95%CI: 8%-30%)。总体而言,94例(23.3%)妇女发生流产,20例早产,10例新生儿低出生体重。复发率仅为3%。结果和定义的异质性限制了可比性。总之,孕期布鲁氏菌病没有标准化的治疗方法。不良的产科结果仍然经常发生,强调需要进行对照研究,以建立安全有效的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo (Journal of the São Paulo Institute of Tropical Medicine) is a journal devoted to research on different aspects of tropical infectious diseases. The journal welcomes original work on all infectious diseases, provided that data and results are directly linked to human health. The journal publishes, besides original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the editor. The journal publishes manuscripts only in English. From 2016 on, the Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo (Journal of the São Paulo Institute of Tropical Medicine) is published online only, maintaining the free access. For more information visit: - http://www.scielo.br/rimtsp - http://www.imt.usp.br/revista-imt/
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书