Hannae Coelho Damasceno-de-Freitas, André Pontes-Silva, Renata Nogueira Duran Marquez-de-Souza, Francisco Winter Dos Santos Figueiredo, Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto Quaresma, Erika da Silva Maciel
{"title":"E-cigarette use in Brazil-prevalence and associated factors in a national cross-sectional study of 16,093 adults: a short communication.","authors":"Hannae Coelho Damasceno-de-Freitas, André Pontes-Silva, Renata Nogueira Duran Marquez-de-Souza, Francisco Winter Dos Santos Figueiredo, Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto Quaresma, Erika da Silva Maciel","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2025.3562.23022026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring tobacco consumption is important for supporting national and global agendas and commitments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the prevalence and sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with e-cigarette use in Brazil, using data from Vigitel 2023.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using secondary data from Vigitel 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, education, and ethnicity), geographic location, and e-cigarette use were analyzed. Descriptive analyses were performed using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Additionally, weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine independent associations between sociodemographic factors and current e-cigarette use. Post-stratification weights were applied, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,093 adults, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 5.55%. In the adjusted model, younger age was strongly associated with use (aOR per year increase = 0.93; 95% CI 0.92-0.94; p < 1). Men had higher odds of use than women (aOR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.12-1.6; p < 0.01). Educational level was not independently associated with usage. Caucasian individuals had higher odds compared to mixed-race individuals (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.05-1.58; p = 0.015). Residents of the southern region showed increased odds (aOR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.1-1.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current e-cigarette use in Brazil is independently associated with younger age, male sex, Caucasian ethnicity, and residence in southern Brazil. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening public policies that regulate and control these devices as well as educational campaigns targeting high-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":"144 2","pages":"e20253562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13186074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2025.3562.23022026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Monitoring tobacco consumption is important for supporting national and global agendas and commitments.
Objective: To analyze the prevalence and sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with e-cigarette use in Brazil, using data from Vigitel 2023.
Design and setting: Cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using secondary data from Vigitel 2023.
Methods: Sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, education, and ethnicity), geographic location, and e-cigarette use were analyzed. Descriptive analyses were performed using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Additionally, weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine independent associations between sociodemographic factors and current e-cigarette use. Post-stratification weights were applied, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated.
Results: Among 16,093 adults, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 5.55%. In the adjusted model, younger age was strongly associated with use (aOR per year increase = 0.93; 95% CI 0.92-0.94; p < 1). Men had higher odds of use than women (aOR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.12-1.6; p < 0.01). Educational level was not independently associated with usage. Caucasian individuals had higher odds compared to mixed-race individuals (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.05-1.58; p = 0.015). Residents of the southern region showed increased odds (aOR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.1-1.99).
Conclusion: Current e-cigarette use in Brazil is independently associated with younger age, male sex, Caucasian ethnicity, and residence in southern Brazil. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening public policies that regulate and control these devices as well as educational campaigns targeting high-risk groups.
背景:监测烟草消费对于支持国家和全球议程和承诺非常重要。目的:利用Vigitel 2023的数据,分析巴西电子烟使用的流行程度以及与之相关的社会人口和地理因素。设计与设置:采用Vigitel 2023的二次数据进行横断面分析研究。方法:分析社会人口学特征(性别、年龄、教育程度和种族)、地理位置和电子烟使用情况。描述性分析采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney u检验。此外,使用加权多变量逻辑回归模型来检查社会人口因素与当前电子烟使用之间的独立关联。应用分层后权重,估计校正优势比(aOR)和95%置信区间(95% CI)。结果:在16093名成年人中,电子烟使用率为5.55%。在调整后的模型中,年龄越小与用药密切相关(aOR每年增加= 0.93;95% CI 0.92-0.94; p < 1)。男性的使用几率高于女性(aOR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.12-1.6; p < 0.01)。教育程度与使用没有独立的关系。与混血儿个体相比,白种人个体的患病几率更高(aOR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.05-1.58; p = 0.015)。南部地区的居民患病几率增加(aOR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.1-1.99)。结论:巴西目前的电子烟使用与年轻、男性、高加索人种和巴西南部的居住地独立相关。这些发现强调了加强管理和控制这些设备的公共政策以及针对高危人群的教育运动的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.