Decentralisation of the Healthcare Systems and the Functioning of Public Health Programmes in Single-Party States: A Systematic Review

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Phonevilay Viphonephom, Ho Van Hoa, Sengchanh Kounnavong, Daniel Reinharz
{"title":"Decentralisation of the Healthcare Systems and the Functioning of Public Health Programmes in Single-Party States: A Systematic Review","authors":"Phonevilay Viphonephom,&nbsp;Ho Van Hoa,&nbsp;Sengchanh Kounnavong,&nbsp;Daniel Reinharz","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Decentralisation is the transfer of authority from central to local governments, involving shared responsibilities in planning, management, and decision-making. In public health, decentralisation might help improve service delivery by allowing local authorities to tailor interventions to the specific needs of diverse, geographically dispersed communities. However, no systematic review has been done on the state of knowledge regarding the capacity of local governments to influence the emergence and operation of national public health programmes in Marxist-Leninist single-party states.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Following the PRISMA protocol, 859 articles from the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were examined. To be selected, studies had to be conducted in a Marxist-Leninist single-party country with a centralised economy and focused on the question of the condition of power sharing between government levels in the design and implementation of specific public health programmes. Only articles in English published between 2013 and 2023 were considered, resulting in 18 studies. Their quality was assessed using the MMAT 2018 and SANRA tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Limited resources and the Party's fundamental ideology may constrain the extent of power sharing influencing local government empowerment. However, factors such as the Party's local unit engagement, collaboration with external organisations, and use of digital communication platforms enhance the capacity of local government to participate in public health programmes design and execution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Despite a politically centralising structure, one-party countries can, under certain circumstances, share responsibilities across government levels in order to increase the adequacy of programmes to meet the health needs of the population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"768-780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Decentralisation is the transfer of authority from central to local governments, involving shared responsibilities in planning, management, and decision-making. In public health, decentralisation might help improve service delivery by allowing local authorities to tailor interventions to the specific needs of diverse, geographically dispersed communities. However, no systematic review has been done on the state of knowledge regarding the capacity of local governments to influence the emergence and operation of national public health programmes in Marxist-Leninist single-party states.

Method

Following the PRISMA protocol, 859 articles from the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were examined. To be selected, studies had to be conducted in a Marxist-Leninist single-party country with a centralised economy and focused on the question of the condition of power sharing between government levels in the design and implementation of specific public health programmes. Only articles in English published between 2013 and 2023 were considered, resulting in 18 studies. Their quality was assessed using the MMAT 2018 and SANRA tools.

Results

Limited resources and the Party's fundamental ideology may constrain the extent of power sharing influencing local government empowerment. However, factors such as the Party's local unit engagement, collaboration with external organisations, and use of digital communication platforms enhance the capacity of local government to participate in public health programmes design and execution.

Conclusion

Despite a politically centralising structure, one-party countries can, under certain circumstances, share responsibilities across government levels in order to increase the adequacy of programmes to meet the health needs of the population.

Abstract Image

医疗保健系统的权力下放和一党专政国家公共卫生计划的运作:系统回顾。
权力下放是将权力从中央转移到地方政府,包括在规划、管理和决策方面分担责任。在公共卫生方面,权力下放可能有助于改善服务的提供,因为它允许地方当局根据地理上分散的不同社区的具体需求量身定制干预措施。然而,关于地方政府影响马列主义一党制国家公共卫生计划的出现和运作的能力的知识状况,没有进行过系统的审查。方法:按照PRISMA协议,从PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库中检索859篇文献。要入选,研究必须在一个马克思列宁主义的一党制国家进行,实行中央集权经济,重点是在设计和实施具体公共卫生方案时各级政府之间权力分享的条件问题。只考虑了2013年至2023年期间发表的英文文章,共有18项研究。使用MMAT 2018和SANRA工具评估其质量。结果:有限的资源和党的基本意识形态可能会制约地方政府权力分享的程度。然而,党的地方单位参与、与外部组织合作以及使用数字通信平台等因素增强了地方政府参与公共卫生规划设计和执行的能力。结论:尽管政治上是中央集权的结构,但一党制国家在某些情况下可以在各级政府之间分担责任,以增加满足人口保健需要的方案的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书