[From Self-Reflection to Building a "Culturally Safe" Care System].

Q3 Nursing
Shoa-Jen Perng
{"title":"[From Self-Reflection to Building a \"Culturally Safe\" Care System].","authors":"Shoa-Jen Perng","doi":"10.6224/JN.26301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As Taiwanese society grows increasingly diverse and inclusive, the challenges faced in frontline clinical care are expanding beyond treating physical illnesses to include how to effectively embrace the life narratives and health beliefs of diverse populations. Although the long-standing emphasis on \"cultural sensitivity\" and \"cultural competence\" in the medical profession has encouraged healthcare professionals to learn about the customs and taboos of different cultures, research findings remind us that culture is not a fixed label. Lacking critical reflection on power imbalances, the accumulation of such knowledge may lead to the emergence and entrenchment of other forms of stereotyping (Curtis et al., 2019). The theme of this issue, \"Cultural Safety in Nursing Practice\", sincerely invites readers to reflect on whether our current standardized healthcare processes have unintentionally silenced certain voices. The articles featured in this issue provide accessible yet in-depth analyses of the multiple dimensions of cultural safety. At the theoretical level, we see how cultural safety resonates with emancipatory theory, cautioning against medical hegemony and advocating for returning to patients the authority to define their quality of care. In terms of practical application and implementation, cultural safety requires nurses to engage in critical self-reflection, active listening, and shared decision-making, thereby reconstructing a more equitable power relationship between healthcare providers and patients. Meanwhile, educational systems should strengthen the cultural teaching competencies of educators in the realms of foundational knowledge, facilitation skills, and curriculum design to foster more-inclusive learning environments. Ultimately, cultural safety must extend beyond the individual level into the organizational and policy levels as well. In one of the articles, the Indigenous Peoples Health Act (2023) is used to illustrate how respect for culture may be incorporated into healthcare indicators and administrative processes, suggesting a foundation for building a people-centered healthcare system that promotes health equity and social justice. Establishing a culturally safe care environment is a transformative process for healthcare professionals in diverse societies. However, cultural safety is not a one-time technical achievement. Thus, nursing practice must shift from merely \"understanding cultural differences\" to \"examining the safety of care\" by prioritizing the subjective experiences of care recipients and reconstructing power relations between providers and patients (Kaphle et al., 2022). Through the practical strategies introduced in this issue, we hope to inspire self-reflection and encourage all readers to become agents of change. Ultimately, every individual entering the healthcare system should feel seen and heard, and be able to receive care that is respectful of their cultural context within an environment of dignity.</p>","PeriodicalId":35672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing","volume":"73 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.26301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Taiwanese society grows increasingly diverse and inclusive, the challenges faced in frontline clinical care are expanding beyond treating physical illnesses to include how to effectively embrace the life narratives and health beliefs of diverse populations. Although the long-standing emphasis on "cultural sensitivity" and "cultural competence" in the medical profession has encouraged healthcare professionals to learn about the customs and taboos of different cultures, research findings remind us that culture is not a fixed label. Lacking critical reflection on power imbalances, the accumulation of such knowledge may lead to the emergence and entrenchment of other forms of stereotyping (Curtis et al., 2019). The theme of this issue, "Cultural Safety in Nursing Practice", sincerely invites readers to reflect on whether our current standardized healthcare processes have unintentionally silenced certain voices. The articles featured in this issue provide accessible yet in-depth analyses of the multiple dimensions of cultural safety. At the theoretical level, we see how cultural safety resonates with emancipatory theory, cautioning against medical hegemony and advocating for returning to patients the authority to define their quality of care. In terms of practical application and implementation, cultural safety requires nurses to engage in critical self-reflection, active listening, and shared decision-making, thereby reconstructing a more equitable power relationship between healthcare providers and patients. Meanwhile, educational systems should strengthen the cultural teaching competencies of educators in the realms of foundational knowledge, facilitation skills, and curriculum design to foster more-inclusive learning environments. Ultimately, cultural safety must extend beyond the individual level into the organizational and policy levels as well. In one of the articles, the Indigenous Peoples Health Act (2023) is used to illustrate how respect for culture may be incorporated into healthcare indicators and administrative processes, suggesting a foundation for building a people-centered healthcare system that promotes health equity and social justice. Establishing a culturally safe care environment is a transformative process for healthcare professionals in diverse societies. However, cultural safety is not a one-time technical achievement. Thus, nursing practice must shift from merely "understanding cultural differences" to "examining the safety of care" by prioritizing the subjective experiences of care recipients and reconstructing power relations between providers and patients (Kaphle et al., 2022). Through the practical strategies introduced in this issue, we hope to inspire self-reflection and encourage all readers to become agents of change. Ultimately, every individual entering the healthcare system should feel seen and heard, and be able to receive care that is respectful of their cultural context within an environment of dignity.

[从自我反思到构建“文化安全”的护理体系]。
随着台湾社会日益多元化和包容性,一线临床护理所面临的挑战已经超越了治疗身体疾病,包括如何有效地接受不同人群的生活叙述和健康信仰。尽管医学界长期以来一直强调“文化敏感性”和“文化能力”,这鼓励医疗保健专业人员了解不同文化的习俗和禁忌,但研究结果提醒我们,文化不是一个固定的标签。由于缺乏对权力失衡的批判性反思,这些知识的积累可能会导致其他形式的刻板印象的出现和巩固(Curtis et al., 2019)。本期以“护理实践中的文化安全”为主题,真诚地邀请读者反思,我们目前标准化的医疗流程是否无意中压制了某些声音。本期专题文章对文化安全的多个维度进行了通俗易懂而又深入的分析。在理论层面上,我们看到文化安全如何与解放理论产生共鸣,警告反对医疗霸权,并倡导将定义其护理质量的权力归还给患者。在实际应用和实施方面,文化安全要求护士进行批判性的自我反思,积极倾听,共同决策,从而在医疗保健提供者和患者之间重建更公平的权力关系。同时,教育系统应加强教育工作者在基础知识、促进技能和课程设计方面的文化教学能力,以营造更具包容性的学习环境。最终,文化安全必须从个人层面延伸到组织和政策层面。其中一篇文章以《原住民健康法》(2023年)为例,说明如何将尊重文化纳入医疗指标和行政流程,为建立以人为本的医疗体系奠定基础,促进健康公平和社会正义。建立一个文化上安全的护理环境对不同社会的医疗保健专业人员来说是一个变革的过程。然而,文化安全不是一次性的技术成果。因此,护理实践必须从仅仅“理解文化差异”转变为“检查护理的安全性”,优先考虑护理接受者的主观体验,重建提供者和患者之间的权力关系(Kaphle et al., 2022)。我们希望透过本期所介绍的实用策略,激发读者的自我反思,并鼓励所有读者成为变革的推动者。最终,每个进入医疗保健系统的人都应该感到被关注和倾听,并能够在有尊严的环境中接受尊重其文化背景的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nursing
Journal of Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书