Multicenter Validation of an AI-Based Snoring Model vs. Wearables for Diagnosing Sleep Apnea.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nature and Science of Sleep Pub Date : 2026-05-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NSS.S582714
Haoyan Guan, Junyu Huang, Danling Liu, Long Yang, Hao Zeng, Jingjing Huang, Beiping Miao
{"title":"Multicenter Validation of an AI-Based Snoring Model vs. Wearables for Diagnosing Sleep Apnea.","authors":"Haoyan Guan, Junyu Huang, Danling Liu, Long Yang, Hao Zeng, Jingjing Huang, Beiping Miao","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S582714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) has high prevalence and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular comorbidities. Polysomnography (PSG) is the diagnostic gold standard but limited by complexity, cost, and accessibility; smart wearables are convenient but less accurate. This study validated an AI-based snoring-sound model and compared its diagnostic performance with a wearable, using PSG as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with suspected SAHS (n = 134) were included and underwent overnight PSG, with simultaneous snoring sound and wearable signal recording. The snoring algorithm used short-time Fourier transform (STFT) spectrograms and a multiscale encoder-attention-decoder neural network for classification. Model performance was assessed using correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were computed for both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disease severity was associated with variation in BMI (p < 0.001) and decreasing oxygen saturation (p < 0.001). The snoring model showed stronger correlation and higher agreement with PSG-derived AHI (r = 0.79, ICC = 0.753) than the wearable (r = 0.68). Although the snoring model yielded consistently higher AUCs, particularly in mild SAHS (AUC = 0.83 vs. 0.72, p = 0.07), the differences between methods were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). Both models achieved excellent discriminative performance in severe SAHS (AUC ≥ 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-driven snoring-sound model demonstrated comparable overall performance and numerically better performance in certain settings, particularly in identifying mild SAHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"18 ","pages":"582714"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13182835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S582714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) has high prevalence and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular comorbidities. Polysomnography (PSG) is the diagnostic gold standard but limited by complexity, cost, and accessibility; smart wearables are convenient but less accurate. This study validated an AI-based snoring-sound model and compared its diagnostic performance with a wearable, using PSG as reference.

Methods: Adults with suspected SAHS (n = 134) were included and underwent overnight PSG, with simultaneous snoring sound and wearable signal recording. The snoring algorithm used short-time Fourier transform (STFT) spectrograms and a multiscale encoder-attention-decoder neural network for classification. Model performance was assessed using correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were computed for both models.

Results: Disease severity was associated with variation in BMI (p < 0.001) and decreasing oxygen saturation (p < 0.001). The snoring model showed stronger correlation and higher agreement with PSG-derived AHI (r = 0.79, ICC = 0.753) than the wearable (r = 0.68). Although the snoring model yielded consistently higher AUCs, particularly in mild SAHS (AUC = 0.83 vs. 0.72, p = 0.07), the differences between methods were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). Both models achieved excellent discriminative performance in severe SAHS (AUC ≥ 0.90).

Conclusion: The AI-driven snoring-sound model demonstrated comparable overall performance and numerically better performance in certain settings, particularly in identifying mild SAHS.

人工智能打鼾模型与可穿戴设备诊断睡眠呼吸暂停的多中心验证
背景:睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(SAHS)具有高患病率和心脑血管合并症。多导睡眠图(PSG)是诊断的金标准,但受复杂性、成本和可及性的限制;智能可穿戴设备很方便,但不太准确。本研究以PSG为参考,验证了基于人工智能的鼾声模型,并将其诊断性能与可穿戴设备进行了比较。方法:纳入疑似SAHS的成人134例,进行夜间PSG,同时记录鼾声和可穿戴信号。打鼾算法使用短时傅立叶变换(STFT)频谱图和多尺度编码器-注意-解码器神经网络进行分类。采用相关分析、类内相关系数(ICC)、Bland-Altman图和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估模型的性能。计算两种模型的准确性、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)值。结果:疾病严重程度与BMI变化(p < 0.001)和血氧饱和度降低(p < 0.001)相关。与可穿戴设备相比,打鼾模型与psg衍生的AHI (r = 0.79, ICC = 0.753)的相关性更强,一致性更高(r = 0.68)。尽管打鼾模型的AUC持续较高,特别是在轻度SAHS中(AUC = 0.83 vs. 0.72, p = 0.07),但两种方法之间的差异无统计学意义(p均为0.05)。两种模型对严重SAHS的判别性能均较好(AUC≥0.90)。结论:人工智能驱动的鼾声模型在某些环境下表现出可比的整体性能和更好的数值表现,特别是在识别轻度SAHS方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature and Science of Sleep
Nature and Science of Sleep Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
245
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep. Specific topics covered in the journal include: The functions of sleep in humans and other animals Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep The genetics of sleep and sleep differences The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness Sleep changes with development and with age Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause) The science and nature of dreams Sleep disorders Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health) The microbiome and sleep Chronotherapy Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书