{"title":"Multicenter Validation of an AI-Based Snoring Model vs. Wearables for Diagnosing Sleep Apnea.","authors":"Haoyan Guan, Junyu Huang, Danling Liu, Long Yang, Hao Zeng, Jingjing Huang, Beiping Miao","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S582714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) has high prevalence and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular comorbidities. Polysomnography (PSG) is the diagnostic gold standard but limited by complexity, cost, and accessibility; smart wearables are convenient but less accurate. This study validated an AI-based snoring-sound model and compared its diagnostic performance with a wearable, using PSG as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with suspected SAHS (n = 134) were included and underwent overnight PSG, with simultaneous snoring sound and wearable signal recording. The snoring algorithm used short-time Fourier transform (STFT) spectrograms and a multiscale encoder-attention-decoder neural network for classification. Model performance was assessed using correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were computed for both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disease severity was associated with variation in BMI (p < 0.001) and decreasing oxygen saturation (p < 0.001). The snoring model showed stronger correlation and higher agreement with PSG-derived AHI (r = 0.79, ICC = 0.753) than the wearable (r = 0.68). Although the snoring model yielded consistently higher AUCs, particularly in mild SAHS (AUC = 0.83 vs. 0.72, p = 0.07), the differences between methods were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). Both models achieved excellent discriminative performance in severe SAHS (AUC ≥ 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-driven snoring-sound model demonstrated comparable overall performance and numerically better performance in certain settings, particularly in identifying mild SAHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"18 ","pages":"582714"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13182835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S582714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) has high prevalence and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular comorbidities. Polysomnography (PSG) is the diagnostic gold standard but limited by complexity, cost, and accessibility; smart wearables are convenient but less accurate. This study validated an AI-based snoring-sound model and compared its diagnostic performance with a wearable, using PSG as reference.
Methods: Adults with suspected SAHS (n = 134) were included and underwent overnight PSG, with simultaneous snoring sound and wearable signal recording. The snoring algorithm used short-time Fourier transform (STFT) spectrograms and a multiscale encoder-attention-decoder neural network for classification. Model performance was assessed using correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were computed for both models.
Results: Disease severity was associated with variation in BMI (p < 0.001) and decreasing oxygen saturation (p < 0.001). The snoring model showed stronger correlation and higher agreement with PSG-derived AHI (r = 0.79, ICC = 0.753) than the wearable (r = 0.68). Although the snoring model yielded consistently higher AUCs, particularly in mild SAHS (AUC = 0.83 vs. 0.72, p = 0.07), the differences between methods were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). Both models achieved excellent discriminative performance in severe SAHS (AUC ≥ 0.90).
Conclusion: The AI-driven snoring-sound model demonstrated comparable overall performance and numerically better performance in certain settings, particularly in identifying mild SAHS.
期刊介绍:
Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep.
Specific topics covered in the journal include:
The functions of sleep in humans and other animals
Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep
The genetics of sleep and sleep differences
The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness
Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness
Sleep changes with development and with age
Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause)
The science and nature of dreams
Sleep disorders
Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life
Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders
Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health)
The microbiome and sleep
Chronotherapy
Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health
Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally
Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health
Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption
Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms
Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.