Effects of carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions with and without L-menthol on hydration and performance recovery following simulated firefighting exercise.
{"title":"Effects of carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions with and without L-menthol on hydration and performance recovery following simulated firefighting exercise.","authors":"Yi-Ju Hsu, Chin-Shan Ho, Chun-Hao Chang, Tsan-Wei Chuang, Shao-Hua Shang","doi":"10.1080/15502783.2026.2676193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Firefighting tasks performed in full protective equipment (PPE) impose extreme thermal and physical strain, providing a model of high-intensity exercise with substantial fluid and electrolyte loss. This study compared the effects of plain water (W), a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES), and a menthol-supplemented carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (MCES) on hydration and performance recovery during the first hour of post-exercise recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four male firefighters completed a standardized simulated firefighting protocol in protective clothing. Participants were randomly assigned to W, CES, or MCES (<i>n</i> = 8 each) and consumed 1.0 L of fluid during 60 minutes of recovery. Hydration status was evaluated using body-mass restoration, salivary osmolality, urine specific gravity, urine color, and urinary electrolytes. Renal markers, lactate clearance, cardiovascular and thermal responses, thirst ratings, and lower-limb explosive power were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body mass restoration showed significant group effects, with MCES greater than W and CES at 60 min (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Rehydration rate was higher for both CES and MCES than W (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Salivary osmolality and urinary sodium favored electrolyte solutions over water (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while urine specific gravity was lower in MCES compared with W and CES (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Blood urea nitrogen and BUN/creatinine ratios were higher in W than both electrolyte conditions at 30 and 60 min (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Lactate clearance was reduced in W compared with CES and MCES (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Jump height declined from pre- to post-recovery in the W and CES groups but was maintained within the MCES group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions improved hydration compared with water. L-menthol did not enhance rehydration but maintained explosive performance, supporting its role as a perceptual adjunct to electrolyte strategies for recovery after exercise in protective clothing.</p>","PeriodicalId":17400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","volume":"23 1","pages":"2676193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13188569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2026.2676193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Firefighting tasks performed in full protective equipment (PPE) impose extreme thermal and physical strain, providing a model of high-intensity exercise with substantial fluid and electrolyte loss. This study compared the effects of plain water (W), a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES), and a menthol-supplemented carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (MCES) on hydration and performance recovery during the first hour of post-exercise recovery.
Methods: Twenty-four male firefighters completed a standardized simulated firefighting protocol in protective clothing. Participants were randomly assigned to W, CES, or MCES (n = 8 each) and consumed 1.0 L of fluid during 60 minutes of recovery. Hydration status was evaluated using body-mass restoration, salivary osmolality, urine specific gravity, urine color, and urinary electrolytes. Renal markers, lactate clearance, cardiovascular and thermal responses, thirst ratings, and lower-limb explosive power were also assessed.
Results: Body mass restoration showed significant group effects, with MCES greater than W and CES at 60 min (p < 0.05). Rehydration rate was higher for both CES and MCES than W (p < 0.05). Salivary osmolality and urinary sodium favored electrolyte solutions over water (p < 0.05), while urine specific gravity was lower in MCES compared with W and CES (p < 0.05). Blood urea nitrogen and BUN/creatinine ratios were higher in W than both electrolyte conditions at 30 and 60 min (p < 0.05). Lactate clearance was reduced in W compared with CES and MCES (p < 0.05). Jump height declined from pre- to post-recovery in the W and CES groups but was maintained within the MCES group.
Conclusions: Carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions improved hydration compared with water. L-menthol did not enhance rehydration but maintained explosive performance, supporting its role as a perceptual adjunct to electrolyte strategies for recovery after exercise in protective clothing.
背景:在全副防护装备(PPE)下执行的消防任务施加了极端的热和物理应变,提供了一种具有大量液体和电解质损失的高强度运动模型。本研究比较了平白水(W)、碳水化合物-电解质溶液(CES)和薄荷醇补充碳水化合物-电解质溶液(MCES)在运动后恢复的第一个小时内对水合作用和性能恢复的影响。方法:24名男性消防员穿着防护服完成了标准化的模拟消防方案。参与者被随机分配到W、CES或MCES组(每个组n = 8),并在恢复60分钟内消耗1.0 L液体。通过体重恢复、唾液渗透压、尿液比重、尿液颜色和尿液电解质来评估水合状态。肾脏指标、乳酸清除率、心血管和热反应、口渴评分和下肢爆发力也被评估。结果:体重恢复表现出明显的组效应,MCES大于W和ce在60 min (p p p p p p p p p)。结论:糖电解质溶液比水更能改善水合作用。l -薄荷醇没有增强补液,但保持了爆发性能,支持其作为知觉辅助电解质策略的作用,用于穿着防护服运动后的恢复。
期刊介绍:
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (JISSN) focuses on the acute and chronic effects of sports nutrition and supplementation strategies on body composition, physical performance and metabolism. JISSN is aimed at researchers and sport enthusiasts focused on delivering knowledge on exercise and nutrition on health, disease, rehabilitation, training, and performance. The journal provides a platform on which readers can determine nutritional strategies that may enhance exercise and/or training adaptations leading to improved health and performance.