Assessment of Monomer Release From Resin Composites Following the Use of Various Modeling Liquids

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-09-15 Epub Date: 2026-05-19 DOI:10.1111/jerd.70195
Dorukcan Yıldırım, Hüseyin Hatırlı, Emine Şirin Karaarslan, Tarık Balkan
{"title":"Assessment of Monomer Release From Resin Composites Following the Use of Various Modeling Liquids","authors":"Dorukcan Yıldırım,&nbsp;Hüseyin Hatırlı,&nbsp;Emine Şirin Karaarslan,&nbsp;Tarık Balkan","doi":"10.1111/jerd.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The chemical composition of resin composites and the use of modeling liquids may influence the release of residual monomer, potentially impacting biocompatibility. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of different modeling liquids on the elution of monomers from two resin composites.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty disc-shaped samples were prepared using two nano-hybrid resin composites (Estelite Sigma Quick, Tokuyama; Harmonize, KERR) and three modeling liquids; Composite Wetting Resin (Ultradent, USA), Modeling Resin (Bisco, USA), and Modeling Liquid (GC, Japan) (<i>n</i> = 10). Resin composites were placed in four 0.5-mm increments into Teflon molds, and modeling liquids were applied with a brush between layers; control groups were prepared without modeling liquids. After polishing (Sof-Lex, 3 M ESPE), specimens were stored in 75% ethanol at 37°C. Release of UDMA, Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, and HEMA was quantified using a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) system (LCMS-8050, Shimadzu, Japan) at 24 h, 7 days, and 30 days. Data normality was assessed, and effects of resin composites type, modeling liquid, and time were analyzed using three-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc testing (α = 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Application of modeling liquid significantly reduced Bis-GMA release for both resin composites (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). While TEGDMA release was significantly decreased in Estelite Sigma Quick groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), no difference was observed in Harmonize groups. Modeling liquid applications increased total HEMA and UDMA release (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). TEGDMA release in the Estelite Sigma Quick-control group was higher than the Harmonize-control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The organic matrix of composite resins and the modeling liquids used influence the release of the tested monomers (TEGDMA, BisGMA, UDMA, and HEMA). The use of modeling liquid showed differences in monomer release according to the content of the liquid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Modeling liquids may increase residual monomer release from resin composites, particularly shortly after polymerization. Clinicians should use these materials sparingly and in accordance with manufacturers' instructions to minimize potential biocompatibility risks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":"38 10","pages":"1933-1946"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jerd.70195","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.70195","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The chemical composition of resin composites and the use of modeling liquids may influence the release of residual monomer, potentially impacting biocompatibility. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of different modeling liquids on the elution of monomers from two resin composites.

Materials and Methods

Eighty disc-shaped samples were prepared using two nano-hybrid resin composites (Estelite Sigma Quick, Tokuyama; Harmonize, KERR) and three modeling liquids; Composite Wetting Resin (Ultradent, USA), Modeling Resin (Bisco, USA), and Modeling Liquid (GC, Japan) (n = 10). Resin composites were placed in four 0.5-mm increments into Teflon molds, and modeling liquids were applied with a brush between layers; control groups were prepared without modeling liquids. After polishing (Sof-Lex, 3 M ESPE), specimens were stored in 75% ethanol at 37°C. Release of UDMA, Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, and HEMA was quantified using a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) system (LCMS-8050, Shimadzu, Japan) at 24 h, 7 days, and 30 days. Data normality was assessed, and effects of resin composites type, modeling liquid, and time were analyzed using three-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc testing (α = 0.05).

Results

Application of modeling liquid significantly reduced Bis-GMA release for both resin composites (p < 0.05). While TEGDMA release was significantly decreased in Estelite Sigma Quick groups (p < 0.05), no difference was observed in Harmonize groups. Modeling liquid applications increased total HEMA and UDMA release (p < 0.05). TEGDMA release in the Estelite Sigma Quick-control group was higher than the Harmonize-control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The organic matrix of composite resins and the modeling liquids used influence the release of the tested monomers (TEGDMA, BisGMA, UDMA, and HEMA). The use of modeling liquid showed differences in monomer release according to the content of the liquid.

Clinical Significance

Modeling liquids may increase residual monomer release from resin composites, particularly shortly after polymerization. Clinicians should use these materials sparingly and in accordance with manufacturers' instructions to minimize potential biocompatibility risks.

评估树脂复合材料在使用不同的建模液体后单体的释放。
目的:树脂复合材料的化学成分和造型液的使用可能会影响残留单体的释放,从而潜在地影响生物相容性。这项体外研究评估了不同的模拟液体对两种树脂复合材料中单体洗脱的影响。材料与方法:采用两种纳米复合树脂(Estelite Sigma Quick, Tokuyama; Harmonize, KERR)和三种模拟液体制备80个盘状样品;复合润湿树脂(Ultradent,美国),建模树脂(Bisco,美国)和建模液(GC,日本)(n = 10)。将树脂复合材料以4个0.5 mm的增量放入聚四氟乙烯模具中,在层与层之间用刷子涂抹造型液;对照组不加造模液。抛光后(sofl - lex, 3 M ESPE),标本保存在75%乙醇中,37°C。采用液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)系统(LCMS-8050, Shimadzu, Japan)在24小时、7天和30天对UDMA、Bis-GMA、TEGDMA和HEMA的释放量进行定量。采用Bonferroni事后检验的三向方差分析分析树脂复合材料类型、建模液体和时间对数据的影响(α = 0.05)。结果:模拟液的应用显著降低了两种树脂复合材料中Bis-GMA的释放(p结论:复合树脂的有机基质和所使用的模拟液影响被测单体(TEGDMA、BisGMA、UDMA和HEMA)的释放。建模液的使用显示出单体释放量随液体含量的不同而不同。临床意义:建模液体可能会增加树脂复合材料中残留单体的释放,特别是在聚合后不久。临床医生应谨慎使用这些材料,并按照制造商的说明,以尽量减少潜在的生物相容性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书