Genetic findings and health care utilization among individuals undergoing population genomic screening for actionable hereditary disorders

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Genetics in Medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2026.102605
Tali Ekstein, Sienna Aguilar, Emily M. Russell, Rachel E. Ellsworth, Kurt D. Christensen, Peter Hulick, Robert Green, Robert Nussbaum, Swaroop Aradhya, John Garcia
{"title":"Genetic findings and health care utilization among individuals undergoing population genomic screening for actionable hereditary disorders","authors":"Tali Ekstein,&nbsp;Sienna Aguilar,&nbsp;Emily M. Russell,&nbsp;Rachel E. Ellsworth,&nbsp;Kurt D. Christensen,&nbsp;Peter Hulick,&nbsp;Robert Green,&nbsp;Robert Nussbaum,&nbsp;Swaroop Aradhya,&nbsp;John Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2026.102605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Genomic screening (GS) can identify the risk of medically actionable, monogenic conditions in individuals who would otherwise not be considered for genetic testing. The yield of pathogenic variants and associated health care utilization among at-risk individuals have not been well-studied in real-world settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Physicians ordered GS panels for up to 167 genes. Calculations included the positive yield overall and for 81 genes on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics’ secondary findings list. Health care utilization and costs were analyzed using insurance claims from 12 months before and after the genetic test results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 50,063 individuals, 8.6% had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants conferring monogenic risk. Relevant health care utilization was higher in individuals with positive results than in those with non-positive results. There was a small but significant increase in median cost of all-cause health care utilization post-test compared with pre-test in participants with positive ($340 vs $215, <em>P</em> = .02) but not negative results ($308 vs $252, <em>P</em> = .12).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that GS in real-world settings can identify at-risk individuals and prompt intervention without significantly increasing health care costs or utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"28 7","pages":"Article 102605"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360026009238","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Genomic screening (GS) can identify the risk of medically actionable, monogenic conditions in individuals who would otherwise not be considered for genetic testing. The yield of pathogenic variants and associated health care utilization among at-risk individuals have not been well-studied in real-world settings.

Methods

Physicians ordered GS panels for up to 167 genes. Calculations included the positive yield overall and for 81 genes on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics’ secondary findings list. Health care utilization and costs were analyzed using insurance claims from 12 months before and after the genetic test results.

Results

Among 50,063 individuals, 8.6% had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants conferring monogenic risk. Relevant health care utilization was higher in individuals with positive results than in those with non-positive results. There was a small but significant increase in median cost of all-cause health care utilization post-test compared with pre-test in participants with positive ($340 vs $215, P = .02) but not negative results ($308 vs $252, P = .12).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that GS in real-world settings can identify at-risk individuals and prompt intervention without significantly increasing health care costs or utilization.
遗传发现和医疗保健利用的个人进行人群基因组筛查的可操作的遗传性疾病。
目的:基因组筛查(GS)可以识别那些不考虑进行基因检测的个体在医学上可行的单基因疾病风险。在现实环境中,对高危人群的致病变异产量和相关的医疗保健利用尚未进行充分研究。方法:医生订购了多达167个基因的GS面板。计算包括总体阳性产量,以及美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院次要发现清单上的81个基因。利用基因检测结果前后12个月的保险索赔,分析了医疗保健利用和成本。结果:在50063个人中,8.6%的人有致病/可能致病的变异,具有单基因风险。相关医疗保健利用在阳性结果的个体中高于非阳性结果的个体。结果呈阳性的参与者(340美元对215美元,p=0.02)的全因医疗保健利用中位数成本与测试前相比有小幅但显著的增加,但结果呈阴性的参与者(308美元对252美元,p=0.12)没有增加。结论:这些发现表明,在现实环境中,GS可以识别有风险的个体并及时干预,而不会显著增加医疗成本或利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书