Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Metacognitive Training (MCT) in a Sample of Patients With Recent Onset Psychosis: Study of the Impact on the Severity and Dimensions of Delusions, Self-Esteem and Depression.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Esther Lorente-Rovira, Ana Luengo, Maria Luisa Barrigón, Raquel Lopez Carrilero, Esther Pousa, Eva Grasa, Ana Barajas, Isabel Ruiz-Delgado, Jordi Cid, Fermin Gonzalez-Higueras, Alejandra Guasp, Blanca Llácer, Maria Jose Escartí, Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins, Steffen Moritz, Julio Sanjuán, Susana Ochoa
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Metacognitive Training (MCT) in a Sample of Patients With Recent Onset Psychosis: Study of the Impact on the Severity and Dimensions of Delusions, Self-Esteem and Depression.","authors":"Esther Lorente-Rovira, Ana Luengo, Maria Luisa Barrigón, Raquel Lopez Carrilero, Esther Pousa, Eva Grasa, Ana Barajas, Isabel Ruiz-Delgado, Jordi Cid, Fermin Gonzalez-Higueras, Alejandra Guasp, Blanca Llácer, Maria Jose Escartí, Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins, Steffen Moritz, Julio Sanjuán, Susana Ochoa","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT). The primary goal was to study the severity and the different dimensions of delusions. The secondary goal was to study its impact on self-esteem and depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was planned as a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. A sample of 122 patients with a recent-onset diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was randomized to receive an MCT intervention (N = 65) or a psychoeducational intervention (N = 57). Patients were assessed at three different time points (baseline, post-treatment and 6 months follow-up) with the following measures: the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale-Delusion subscale (PSYRATS-Del), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). A generalized linear model comparing the MCT group and psychoeducational group in the main measures across all three assessment moments was constructed, controlling for the number of sessions they attended.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the psychoeducational group, MCT improved in several dimensions of delusions at the follow-up: amount of preoccupation about delusions (p = 0.048), duration of preoccupation about delusions (p = 0.048) and conviction (p = 0.048). No differences between groups were found in self-esteem or depression at any time-point, but both interventions improved self-esteem-in the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In recent-onset psychosis patients, MCT demonstrated the expected benefits in conviction, as 'sowing seeds of doubt' is the core MCT mechanism of change. Despite functioning differently, both interventions improved patients' self-esteem. No superiority of MCT was discovered in self-esteem or depression in the short-term follow-up studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"33 3","pages":"e70284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT). The primary goal was to study the severity and the different dimensions of delusions. The secondary goal was to study its impact on self-esteem and depressive symptoms.

Methods: This study was planned as a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. A sample of 122 patients with a recent-onset diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was randomized to receive an MCT intervention (N = 65) or a psychoeducational intervention (N = 57). Patients were assessed at three different time points (baseline, post-treatment and 6 months follow-up) with the following measures: the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale-Delusion subscale (PSYRATS-Del), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). A generalized linear model comparing the MCT group and psychoeducational group in the main measures across all three assessment moments was constructed, controlling for the number of sessions they attended.

Results: In comparison with the psychoeducational group, MCT improved in several dimensions of delusions at the follow-up: amount of preoccupation about delusions (p = 0.048), duration of preoccupation about delusions (p = 0.048) and conviction (p = 0.048). No differences between groups were found in self-esteem or depression at any time-point, but both interventions improved self-esteem-in the follow-up.

Conclusions: In recent-onset psychosis patients, MCT demonstrated the expected benefits in conviction, as 'sowing seeds of doubt' is the core MCT mechanism of change. Despite functioning differently, both interventions improved patients' self-esteem. No superiority of MCT was discovered in self-esteem or depression in the short-term follow-up studied.

元认知训练(MCT)对初发精神病患者妄想、自尊和抑郁程度及维度影响的随机对照试验
前言:本研究的目的是评估元认知训练治疗精神病(MCT)的疗效。主要目的是研究妄想的严重程度和不同维度。第二个目标是研究它对自尊和抑郁症状的影响。方法:本研究为多中心随机对照临床试验。122例新近诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍的患者随机接受MCT干预(N = 65)或心理教育干预(N = 57)。在三个不同的时间点(基线、治疗后和6个月的随访)对患者进行评估:精神病症状评定量表-妄想子量表(PSYRATS-Del)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)和罗森博格自尊量表(RSE)。构建了一个广义线性模型,比较MCT组和心理教育组在所有三个评估时刻的主要措施,控制他们参加的会议数量。结果:与心理教育组比较,MCT在妄想妄想的关注量(p = 0.048)、关注妄想妄想持续时间(p = 0.048)和信念(p = 0.048)几个维度上均有改善。在任何时间点,两组之间在自尊或抑郁方面都没有发现差异,但在随访中,两种干预措施都改善了自尊。结论:在新近发病的精神病患者中,MCT在信念方面显示出预期的益处,因为“播下怀疑的种子”是MCT改变的核心机制。尽管功能不同,但两种干预措施都提高了患者的自尊心。短期随访研究未发现MCT在自尊和抑郁方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书