Mechanisms of Change in Day Treatment Group Schema Therapy for Severe Personality Disorders: A Multiple Baseline Single-Case Study.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Joska van Houten, Samantha Bouwmeester, Nathan Bachrach
{"title":"Mechanisms of Change in Day Treatment Group Schema Therapy for Severe Personality Disorders: A Multiple Baseline Single-Case Study.","authors":"Joska van Houten, Samantha Bouwmeester, Nathan Bachrach","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although schema therapy (ST) is an effective intervention for individuals with personality disorders (PDs), its mechanisms of change are not yet well delineated. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for determining the key processes that optimize treatment efficacy. This study investigated mechanisms of change in day treatment group ST (DT-GST) for patients with severe PDs. PD severity was the primary outcome in a multiple-baseline single-case design, assessed before and after DT-GST, alongside idiosyncratic negative core beliefs measured weekly over 30 weeks. Secondary outcomes were early maladaptive schemas (EMS) and schema modes (SMs), measured pre- and post-treatment. Mechanisms of change were examined through visual inspection, correlations and randomization tests. Changes in PD severity moderately correlated with changes in negative core beliefs (r = 0.57), but not with SMs. Negative core beliefs correlated positively with the Vulnerable Child (r = 0.76), Punitive Parent (r = 0.78), Demanding Parent (r = 0.61) and Detached Self-Soother (r = 0.58) modes and negatively with the Happy Child (r = -0.77) and Healthy Adult (r = -0.57) modes. Meaningful change occurred across all treatment phases, with the greatest therapeutic progress in the second and third phases. This study highlights the central role of idiosyncratic negative core beliefs in reducing PD severity while also underscoring the importance of changes in SMs. Findings suggest that ST should prioritize reducing the Vulnerable Child mode and its associated EMS while reinforcing adaptive Healthy Adult and Happy Child modes and diminishing maladaptive Parent and detachment-related coping modes. Further longitudinal research with repeated assessments is needed to clarify mechanisms of change in ST.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"33 3","pages":"e70289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although schema therapy (ST) is an effective intervention for individuals with personality disorders (PDs), its mechanisms of change are not yet well delineated. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for determining the key processes that optimize treatment efficacy. This study investigated mechanisms of change in day treatment group ST (DT-GST) for patients with severe PDs. PD severity was the primary outcome in a multiple-baseline single-case design, assessed before and after DT-GST, alongside idiosyncratic negative core beliefs measured weekly over 30 weeks. Secondary outcomes were early maladaptive schemas (EMS) and schema modes (SMs), measured pre- and post-treatment. Mechanisms of change were examined through visual inspection, correlations and randomization tests. Changes in PD severity moderately correlated with changes in negative core beliefs (r = 0.57), but not with SMs. Negative core beliefs correlated positively with the Vulnerable Child (r = 0.76), Punitive Parent (r = 0.78), Demanding Parent (r = 0.61) and Detached Self-Soother (r = 0.58) modes and negatively with the Happy Child (r = -0.77) and Healthy Adult (r = -0.57) modes. Meaningful change occurred across all treatment phases, with the greatest therapeutic progress in the second and third phases. This study highlights the central role of idiosyncratic negative core beliefs in reducing PD severity while also underscoring the importance of changes in SMs. Findings suggest that ST should prioritize reducing the Vulnerable Child mode and its associated EMS while reinforcing adaptive Healthy Adult and Happy Child modes and diminishing maladaptive Parent and detachment-related coping modes. Further longitudinal research with repeated assessments is needed to clarify mechanisms of change in ST.

重度人格障碍日治疗组图式治疗的改变机制:一项多基线单例研究。
虽然图式疗法(ST)是一种有效的人格障碍(pd)干预措施,但其改变机制尚未得到很好的描述。了解这些机制对于确定优化治疗效果的关键过程至关重要。本研究探讨重度pd患者日治疗组ST (DT-GST)变化的机制。PD严重程度是多基线单例设计的主要结果,在DT-GST之前和之后进行评估,同时在30周内每周测量特殊的负面核心信念。次要结局是治疗前和治疗后测量的早期适应不良图式(EMS)和图式模式(SMs)。变化机制通过目测、相关性和随机试验进行检验。PD严重程度的改变与消极核心信念的改变中度相关(r = 0.57),但与SMs无关。负性核心信念与脆弱儿童(r = 0.76)、惩罚父母(r = 0.78)、苛求父母(r = 0.61)和超然自我安抚(r = 0.58)模式呈正相关,与快乐儿童(r = -0.77)和健康成人(r = -0.57)模式负相关。在所有治疗阶段都发生了有意义的变化,在第二和第三阶段的治疗进展最大。本研究强调了特质消极核心信念在降低PD严重程度中的核心作用,同时也强调了SMs变化的重要性。研究结果表明,ST应优先减少脆弱儿童模式及其相关的EMS,同时加强适应的健康成人和快乐儿童模式,减少适应不良的父母和超脱相关的应对模式。需要进一步的纵向研究和重复评估来阐明ST变化的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书