Analyzing infection prevention and control program in Egyptian university hospitals: strengths and areas for improvement.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Moustapha Ramadan, Nesrine Fathi Hanafi, Amany Mohamed Aboelenein, Asmaa Abdel-Aziz, Abeer Ezzat Elsayed, Mahmod Arabi, Hoda Mohamed Owais
{"title":"Analyzing infection prevention and control program in Egyptian university hospitals: strengths and areas for improvement.","authors":"Moustapha Ramadan, Nesrine Fathi Hanafi, Amany Mohamed Aboelenein, Asmaa Abdel-Aziz, Abeer Ezzat Elsayed, Mahmod Arabi, Hoda Mohamed Owais","doi":"10.1186/s13756-026-01758-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections are a major global health problem. Published international guidelines aim to provide technical support for countries and healthcare facilities to implement efficient infection prevention and control (IPC) programs and evaluate them.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate Egyptian university hospitals' current IPC program and activities status, using an international standardized tool. Afterwards, the identification of existing strengths and weaknesses of the IPC program is needed for improvement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study design using a convenience sample to assess the implementation of the IPC program at 26 healthcare facilities running the IPC activities for at least 5 years, amounting to > 11,000 beds, from four selected Egyptian Universities. The WHO IPCAF assessment tool and scoring were used to assess the level of compliance for each core component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted median of participating facilities was 600 ( IQR = 571.25-646.88). The arithmetic mean of participating facilities was 587.19. None of the studied facilities had an inadequate level of IPC, and (50%) of facilities showed an advanced level. IPC guidelines had the highest mean score (83.46%), followed by the IPC program (76.73%). On the other hand, the multimodal strategies in IPC had the lowest mean score (65.57%) following the IPC training and education (69.23%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the IPC program is appropriately implemented in the studied hospitals, some challenges exist, and enhancement of multidisciplinary integration optimizes multimodal IPC strategies, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship, training programs, and monitoring and feedback systems are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13185206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-026-01758-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare-associated infections are a major global health problem. Published international guidelines aim to provide technical support for countries and healthcare facilities to implement efficient infection prevention and control (IPC) programs and evaluate them.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate Egyptian university hospitals' current IPC program and activities status, using an international standardized tool. Afterwards, the identification of existing strengths and weaknesses of the IPC program is needed for improvement.

Method: A cross-sectional study design using a convenience sample to assess the implementation of the IPC program at 26 healthcare facilities running the IPC activities for at least 5 years, amounting to > 11,000 beds, from four selected Egyptian Universities. The WHO IPCAF assessment tool and scoring were used to assess the level of compliance for each core component.

Results: The weighted median of participating facilities was 600 ( IQR = 571.25-646.88). The arithmetic mean of participating facilities was 587.19. None of the studied facilities had an inadequate level of IPC, and (50%) of facilities showed an advanced level. IPC guidelines had the highest mean score (83.46%), followed by the IPC program (76.73%). On the other hand, the multimodal strategies in IPC had the lowest mean score (65.57%) following the IPC training and education (69.23%).

Conclusion: Although the IPC program is appropriately implemented in the studied hospitals, some challenges exist, and enhancement of multidisciplinary integration optimizes multimodal IPC strategies, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship, training programs, and monitoring and feedback systems are required.

分析埃及大学医院感染预防和控制方案:优势和改进的领域。
背景:医疗保健相关感染是一个主要的全球健康问题。已公布的国际准则旨在为各国和卫生保健机构提供技术支持,以实施有效的感染预防和控制(IPC)规划并对其进行评估。目的:本研究旨在利用国际标准化工具评估埃及大学医院目前的IPC项目和活动状况。然后,需要识别IPC程序的现有优势和劣势,以进行改进。方法:采用横断面研究设计,采用方便样本,评估来自四所选定的埃及大学的26家开展IPC活动至少5年的卫生保健机构的IPC计划的实施情况,这些机构的床位总数为101.1万张。使用世卫组织IPCAF评估工具和评分来评估每个核心组成部分的遵守程度。结果:参与机构的加权中位数为600 (IQR = 571.25 ~ 646.88)。参与设施的算术平均值为587.19个。所研究的设施中没有IPC水平不足的,(50%)的设施显示出先进水平。IPC指南的平均得分最高(83.46%),其次是IPC程序(76.73%)。另一方面,IPC中多模式策略的平均得分最低(65.57%),其次是IPC培训和教育(69.23%)。结论:虽然IPC项目在研究的医院得到了适当的实施,但仍存在一些挑战,需要加强多学科整合,优化多模式IPC策略,实施抗菌药物管理,培训计划以及监测和反馈系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书