Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgery in Adult Patients: A Double-Blinded Prospective Comparative Study.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-25 eCollection Date: 2026-02-28 DOI:10.5812/aapm-169635
Alyaa Abdel Sattar Mohamed Hassan, Atef Mohamed Mahmoud, Samar Ahmed Ramadan Mohamed, Mohammed Awad Alsaied, Ahmed Ali Lotfy
{"title":"Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgery in Adult Patients: A Double-Blinded Prospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Alyaa Abdel Sattar Mohamed Hassan, Atef Mohamed Mahmoud, Samar Ahmed Ramadan Mohamed, Mohammed Awad Alsaied, Ahmed Ali Lotfy","doi":"10.5812/aapm-169635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain following lumbar spine surgery (LSS) can significantly impact recovery and patient satisfaction. Ultrasound-guided regional techniques such as quadratus lumborum plane block (QLPB) and caudal block (UGCB) have been proposed to enhance postoperative analgesia while reducing opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse effects (AEs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided QLPB versus ultrasound-guided caudal block in adult lumbar spine stabilization surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blinded, prospective comparative study included 111 adult patients (18 - 60 years, ASA physical status I - II) scheduled for elective lumbar spine stabilization surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into three equal groups: Control (standard analgesia), ultrasound-guided caudal block (UGCB), or ultrasound-guided QLPB. Blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance after induction of general anesthesia using 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was the time to first postoperative rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), total 24-hour postoperative opioid (meperidine) consumption, intraoperative opioid requirements, hemodynamic variables, and block- or opioid-related adverse events over the first 24 postoperative hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time until the initial rescue analgesia was significantly delayed with QLPB in comparison to control and Caudal, with medians of 15, 1, and 5 h, respectively (P < 0.001). The total 24-hour (meperidine) intake was significantly diminished with QLPB as opposed to Caudal and control (P < 0.05). Numerical Pain Rating Scale scores were significantly diminished in QLPB and Caudal as opposed to control at 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h (P < 0.001), with comparability detected at 12 h and 18 h. Intraoperative fentanyl administration was markedly diminished in the QLPB and Caudal groups, in contrast to the control group (P < 0.001). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting exhibited comparability across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both ultrasound-guided caudal block and QLPB significantly improved postoperative analgesia compared with standard analgesic management following lumbar spine stabilization surgery. However, QLPB provided longer-lasting analgesia and was associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption than caudal block, highlighting its advantage for prolonged postoperative pain control.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"e169635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13181817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-169635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain following lumbar spine surgery (LSS) can significantly impact recovery and patient satisfaction. Ultrasound-guided regional techniques such as quadratus lumborum plane block (QLPB) and caudal block (UGCB) have been proposed to enhance postoperative analgesia while reducing opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse effects (AEs).

Objectives: To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided QLPB versus ultrasound-guided caudal block in adult lumbar spine stabilization surgery.

Methods: This randomized, double-blinded, prospective comparative study included 111 adult patients (18 - 60 years, ASA physical status I - II) scheduled for elective lumbar spine stabilization surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into three equal groups: Control (standard analgesia), ultrasound-guided caudal block (UGCB), or ultrasound-guided QLPB. Blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance after induction of general anesthesia using 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was the time to first postoperative rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), total 24-hour postoperative opioid (meperidine) consumption, intraoperative opioid requirements, hemodynamic variables, and block- or opioid-related adverse events over the first 24 postoperative hours.

Results: The time until the initial rescue analgesia was significantly delayed with QLPB in comparison to control and Caudal, with medians of 15, 1, and 5 h, respectively (P < 0.001). The total 24-hour (meperidine) intake was significantly diminished with QLPB as opposed to Caudal and control (P < 0.05). Numerical Pain Rating Scale scores were significantly diminished in QLPB and Caudal as opposed to control at 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h (P < 0.001), with comparability detected at 12 h and 18 h. Intraoperative fentanyl administration was markedly diminished in the QLPB and Caudal groups, in contrast to the control group (P < 0.001). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting exhibited comparability across groups.

Conclusions: Both ultrasound-guided caudal block and QLPB significantly improved postoperative analgesia compared with standard analgesic management following lumbar spine stabilization surgery. However, QLPB provided longer-lasting analgesia and was associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption than caudal block, highlighting its advantage for prolonged postoperative pain control.

超声引导下腰侧肌阻滞与腰方肌平面阻滞在成人腰椎手术中的镇痛效果:一项双盲前瞻性比较研究。
背景:腰椎手术(LSS)术后疼痛会显著影响康复和患者满意度。超声引导的局部技术,如腰方肌平面阻滞(QLPB)和尾侧阻滞(UGCB),已被提出用于增强术后镇痛,同时减少阿片类药物的消耗和阿片类药物相关的不良反应(ae)。目的:比较超声引导下QLPB与超声引导下尾侧阻滞在成人腰椎稳定手术中的镇痛效果和安全性。方法:这项随机、双盲、前瞻性比较研究纳入111例成人患者(18 - 60岁,ASA身体状态I - II),计划进行择期腰椎稳定手术。患者被随机分为三组:对照组(标准镇痛)、超声引导下的尾侧阻滞(UGCB)和超声引导下的QLPB。采用0.25%布比卡因全麻诱导后在超声引导下阻滞。主要观察指标为术后首次抢救镇痛的时间。次要结局包括使用数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS)的术后疼痛评分、术后24小时阿片类药物(哌替啶)总消耗量、术中阿片类药物需求、血流动力学变量以及术后前24小时内阻滞或阿片类药物相关不良事件。结果:与对照组和尾侧组相比,QLPB组至首次抢救镇痛的时间明显延迟,中位数分别为15、1和5 h (P < 0.001)。与尾组和对照组相比,QLPB组24小时总哌嗪摄入量显著减少(P < 0.05)。与对照组相比,在30分钟、1、2、4、8和24小时,QLPB组和尾侧组的数值疼痛评定量表评分显著降低(P < 0.001),在12小时和18小时检测到可比性。与对照组相比,QLPB组和尾侧组术中芬太尼给药明显减少(P < 0.001)。恶心和呕吐的发生在各组间表现出可比性。结论:超声引导下的尾侧阻滞和QLPB均能显著改善腰椎稳定手术后的镇痛效果。然而,与尾侧阻滞相比,QLPB提供了更持久的镇痛,术后阿片类药物消耗更低,突出了其在延长术后疼痛控制方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书