Species Assembly Is Lineage Specific: Phylogenetic Divergent Species Aggregate in Some Lineages but Segregate in Others.

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1111/ele.70402
Keliang Zhang, Alexander J Fergus, Lou Barbe, Bernhard Schmid, Eric Allan, Tania Jenkins, Christiane Roscher, Thomas Leclère, Igor V Bartish, Andreas Prinzing
{"title":"Species Assembly Is Lineage Specific: Phylogenetic Divergent Species Aggregate in Some Lineages but Segregate in Others.","authors":"Keliang Zhang, Alexander J Fergus, Lou Barbe, Bernhard Schmid, Eric Allan, Tania Jenkins, Christiane Roscher, Thomas Leclère, Igor V Bartish, Andreas Prinzing","doi":"10.1111/ele.70402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phylogenetic divergence between species may weaken both negative and positive biotic interactions. Whether, as a result, divergent species aggregate or segregate remains unclear. These interactions differ among lineages, and without immigration, the effects of interactions might be overridden by dispersal limitation. We studied changes in co-occurrence across 5 years for 1770 pairs of grassland species drawn primarily from four major lineages (families), reducing dispersal limitation by seed addition. Across all lineages, changes in co-occurrence were almost unrelated to phylogenetic divergence, partly reflecting opposing relationships within two groups of families: Fabaceae/Poaceae, where more divergent species segregated, versus Asteraceae/Apiaceae, where they aggregated. Dispersal limitation through lack of immigration existed, without eliminating divergence effects. We conclude that species assembly differed between major lineages, with spatial aggregation in Asteraceae/Apiaceae possibly reflecting limiting similarity, whereas segregation in Fabaceae/Poaceae may reflect mutualist incompatibility or asymmetric competition. These processes could feedback on within-lineage diversification.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70402"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phylogenetic divergence between species may weaken both negative and positive biotic interactions. Whether, as a result, divergent species aggregate or segregate remains unclear. These interactions differ among lineages, and without immigration, the effects of interactions might be overridden by dispersal limitation. We studied changes in co-occurrence across 5 years for 1770 pairs of grassland species drawn primarily from four major lineages (families), reducing dispersal limitation by seed addition. Across all lineages, changes in co-occurrence were almost unrelated to phylogenetic divergence, partly reflecting opposing relationships within two groups of families: Fabaceae/Poaceae, where more divergent species segregated, versus Asteraceae/Apiaceae, where they aggregated. Dispersal limitation through lack of immigration existed, without eliminating divergence effects. We conclude that species assembly differed between major lineages, with spatial aggregation in Asteraceae/Apiaceae possibly reflecting limiting similarity, whereas segregation in Fabaceae/Poaceae may reflect mutualist incompatibility or asymmetric competition. These processes could feedback on within-lineage diversification.

物种聚集是谱系特异性的:系统发育不同的物种在一些谱系中聚集,但在另一些谱系中分离。
物种之间的系统发育差异可能会削弱消极和积极的生物相互作用。结果,不同的物种是聚集还是分离仍然不清楚。这些相互作用在世系之间是不同的,如果没有移民,相互作用的影响可能会被分散限制所覆盖。我们研究了1770对主要来自4个主要谱系(科)的草地物种在5年内共发生的变化,减少了种子添加对传播的限制。在所有谱系中,共发生的变化几乎与系统发育分化无关,部分反映了两组科之间的对立关系:Fabaceae/Poaceae,更多不同的物种分离,而Asteraceae/Apiaceae,它们聚集。由于缺乏移民而造成的扩散限制存在,但没有消除发散效应。结果表明,各主要谱系的物种组装存在差异,菊科/蜂科的空间聚集可能反映了有限的相似性,而豆科/禾科的空间分离可能反映了共生不相容或不对称竞争。这些过程可以反馈谱系内的多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书