Applications of artificial intelligence and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction: a systematic review.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2026-04-20 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztag063
Mohanad Alkhodari, Prenali D Sattwika, Hannah R Cutler, George Milner, Turkay Kart, Leontios J Hadjileontiadis, Ahsan H Khandoker, Adam J Lewandowski, Winok Lapidaire, Abhirup Banerjee, Paul Leeson
{"title":"Applications of artificial intelligence and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction: a systematic review.","authors":"Mohanad Alkhodari, Prenali D Sattwika, Hannah R Cutler, George Milner, Turkay Kart, Leontios J Hadjileontiadis, Ahsan H Khandoker, Adam J Lewandowski, Winok Lapidaire, Abhirup Banerjee, Paul Leeson","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztag063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current hypertension guidelines focus on blood pressure control, but incorporating end-organ imaging could improve understanding of disease manifestations. We undertook a systematic review to evaluate current task-level applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases up to end of December 2025. Retrieved studies were grouped by AI task, and a thematic qualitative analysis per-task was conducted to evaluate organ-specific findings, AI methodologies, and research gaps. For quantitative synthesis, the I2 statistic derived from Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity, and forest plots were generated to visualize effect sizes. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023427430). The search strategy yielded 48 studies. Thematic analysis categorized the studies into five major tasks, with the majority employing supervised learning for classification processes. Nearly half of the studies focused on the heart. However, paucity of studies performed multi-organ assessment, external validation, and phenotyping or predicting future risk. AI and computational approaches in imaging achieved an overall sensitivity of 0.84 [0.69-0.93] in identifying hypertension from normotension, highest with brain imaging. Sensitivity reached 0.92 [0.90-0.94] in discriminating hypertension from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Current research focusses primarily on hypertension prediction using single organ information. While results are promising, datasets remain small with limited external validation. There remains a need for discovery-oriented research to uncover disease heterogeneity, multi-organ phenotypes, and support personalized and targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"7 4","pages":"ztag063"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13175042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current hypertension guidelines focus on blood pressure control, but incorporating end-organ imaging could improve understanding of disease manifestations. We undertook a systematic review to evaluate current task-level applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases up to end of December 2025. Retrieved studies were grouped by AI task, and a thematic qualitative analysis per-task was conducted to evaluate organ-specific findings, AI methodologies, and research gaps. For quantitative synthesis, the I2 statistic derived from Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity, and forest plots were generated to visualize effect sizes. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023427430). The search strategy yielded 48 studies. Thematic analysis categorized the studies into five major tasks, with the majority employing supervised learning for classification processes. Nearly half of the studies focused on the heart. However, paucity of studies performed multi-organ assessment, external validation, and phenotyping or predicting future risk. AI and computational approaches in imaging achieved an overall sensitivity of 0.84 [0.69-0.93] in identifying hypertension from normotension, highest with brain imaging. Sensitivity reached 0.92 [0.90-0.94] in discriminating hypertension from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Current research focusses primarily on hypertension prediction using single organ information. While results are promising, datasets remain small with limited external validation. There remains a need for discovery-oriented research to uncover disease heterogeneity, multi-organ phenotypes, and support personalized and targeted interventions.

人工智能和计算方法在高血压识别、表型和预后预测成像中的应用:系统综述。
目前的高血压指南侧重于血压控制,但结合终末器官成像可以提高对疾病表现的认识。我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估当前任务级人工智能(AI)和计算方法在高血压识别、表型和结果预测成像中的应用。到2025年12月底,在多个数据库中进行了系统搜索。检索到的研究按人工智能任务分组,并对每个任务进行专题定性分析,以评估器官特异性发现、人工智能方法和研究差距。为了进行定量综合,采用Cochran’s Q检验得出的I2统计量来评估异质性,并生成森林图来可视化效应大小。该审查已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023427430)。搜索策略产生了48项研究。主题分析将研究分为五个主要任务,其中大多数使用监督学习进行分类过程。近一半的研究集中在心脏上。然而,缺乏多器官评估、外部验证、表型或预测未来风险的研究。人工智能和成像计算方法在从正常血压中识别高血压方面的总灵敏度为0.84[0.69-0.93],在脑成像中最高。区分高血压和肥厚性心肌病的敏感性为0.92[0.90-0.94]。目前的研究主要集中在利用单器官信息预测高血压。虽然结果很有希望,但数据集仍然很小,外部验证有限。仍然需要以发现为导向的研究来揭示疾病异质性、多器官表型,并支持个性化和有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书