Artificial intelligence in breaking the learning curve for echocardiography: a secondary analysis of a multicentre trial.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2026-04-20 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztag065
Caroline Schissel, Daniel Trotzky, Noa Avisar, Talia Amar, Itay Kezurer, Dan Spiegelstein, Christopher W Baugh, Nicole M Duggan, Sachin Shah, Sarju Ganatra, Sourbha Dani, Andrew Goldsmith
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in breaking the learning curve for echocardiography: a secondary analysis of a multicentre trial.","authors":"Caroline Schissel, Daniel Trotzky, Noa Avisar, Talia Amar, Itay Kezurer, Dan Spiegelstein, Christopher W Baugh, Nicole M Duggan, Sachin Shah, Sarju Ganatra, Sourbha Dani, Andrew Goldsmith","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztag065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The integration of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by non-specialists and the shortage of trained sonographers highlights the need for scalable training approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of novice operators performing artificial intelligence (AI)-guided limited transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and to assess whether acquired images were sufficient for diagnostic interpretation of structural cardiac disease.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this multicentre, prospective secondary analysis, nine novice operators performed limited TTE scans on 159 patients using a handheld device with AI-based acquisition guidance. Following eight hours of standardized training, novices independently obtained six standard TTE views. Three blinded expert reviewers graded image quality on a 1-5 scale and assessed diagnostic adequacy. Image scores were used to generate learning curves, and subgroup analyses examined the influence of patient characteristics. Of 954 novice-acquired images, 97.7% met the diagnostic threshold (score ≥3). After training, all operators achieved mean scores ≥3 across patients. AI-guidance consistently enabled high-quality imaging across all views, with minimal impact from sex, age, or pathology. Body mass index (BMI) showed a significant effect (<i>P</i> = 0.0029), though all subgroups exceeded diagnostic thresholds: 4.44 ± 0.17 (BMI <18), 4.40 ± 0.04 (18-24), 4.12 ± 0.12 (25-29), and 4.07 ± 0.07 (>30). Experts reliably ruled out left ventricular dysfunction (99.4%) and hypertrophy (98.7%); agreement was lower for wall motion abnormalities (80.7%) and atrial dilation (86.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Novices with no prior POCUS experience achieved diagnostic-quality TTE images after one day of AI-guided training. AI may supplement conventional echocardiography training, and future research should evaluate its integration into routine clinical workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"7 4","pages":"ztag065"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13175043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The integration of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by non-specialists and the shortage of trained sonographers highlights the need for scalable training approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of novice operators performing artificial intelligence (AI)-guided limited transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and to assess whether acquired images were sufficient for diagnostic interpretation of structural cardiac disease.

Methods and results: In this multicentre, prospective secondary analysis, nine novice operators performed limited TTE scans on 159 patients using a handheld device with AI-based acquisition guidance. Following eight hours of standardized training, novices independently obtained six standard TTE views. Three blinded expert reviewers graded image quality on a 1-5 scale and assessed diagnostic adequacy. Image scores were used to generate learning curves, and subgroup analyses examined the influence of patient characteristics. Of 954 novice-acquired images, 97.7% met the diagnostic threshold (score ≥3). After training, all operators achieved mean scores ≥3 across patients. AI-guidance consistently enabled high-quality imaging across all views, with minimal impact from sex, age, or pathology. Body mass index (BMI) showed a significant effect (P = 0.0029), though all subgroups exceeded diagnostic thresholds: 4.44 ± 0.17 (BMI <18), 4.40 ± 0.04 (18-24), 4.12 ± 0.12 (25-29), and 4.07 ± 0.07 (>30). Experts reliably ruled out left ventricular dysfunction (99.4%) and hypertrophy (98.7%); agreement was lower for wall motion abnormalities (80.7%) and atrial dilation (86.6%).

Conclusion: Novices with no prior POCUS experience achieved diagnostic-quality TTE images after one day of AI-guided training. AI may supplement conventional echocardiography training, and future research should evaluate its integration into routine clinical workflows.

人工智能打破超声心动图学习曲线:一项多中心试验的二次分析。
目的:点护理超声(POCUS)非专业人员的整合和训练有素的超声医师的短缺突出了可扩展的培训方法的需要。本研究旨在评估新手操作人工智能(AI)引导的有限经胸超声心动图(TTE)的学习曲线,并评估获得的图像是否足以用于诊断结构性心脏病。方法和结果:在这项多中心的前瞻性二次分析中,9名新手操作员使用手持设备对159名患者进行了有限的TTE扫描,该设备具有基于人工智能的采集指导。经过8小时的标准化培训,新手独立获得6个标准的TTE视图。三名盲法专家评审对图像质量进行1-5级评分,并评估诊断的充分性。图像评分用于生成学习曲线,亚组分析检查患者特征的影响。在954张新手获得的图像中,97.7%符合诊断阈值(评分≥3)。经过培训,所有操作者的平均得分均≥3分。人工智能引导始终如一地在所有视图上实现高质量成像,而性别、年龄或病理的影响最小。体重指数(BMI)有显著影响(P = 0.0029),但所有亚组均超过诊断阈值:4.44±0.17 (BMI 30)。专家可靠地排除了左心室功能障碍(99.4%)和肥厚(98.7%);壁运动异常(80.7%)和心房扩张(86.6%)的一致性较低。结论:没有POCUS经验的新手在经过一天的人工智能引导训练后获得了诊断质量的TTE图像。人工智能可能是传统超声心动图训练的补充,未来的研究应评估其与常规临床工作流程的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书