Syntactic and Prosodic Phrasal Alignment in Naturalistic Language.

IF 2.5 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Julie Bannon, Barbora Hlachova, Fernanda Ferreira
{"title":"Syntactic and Prosodic Phrasal Alignment in Naturalistic Language.","authors":"Julie Bannon, Barbora Hlachova, Fernanda Ferreira","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prosody is an intrinsic element of language production, linking together multiple levels of linguistic representation to shape both the structure and interpretation of utterances. However, common theories of prosodic phrasing in spoken language often fail to capture factors associated with planning and recovery, as well as performance-based effects related to working memory. Much of what we know about prosody, whether it be the features speakers are thought to generate or the ones listeners are believed to process, is based on forms that are atypical in spoken language. Recent developments in data analysis methods, however, allow for the efficient study of unrehearsed spoken language. The current work aims to develop more ecologically valid theories of prosody and its relationship to syntactic structure through the analysis of unrehearsed scene descriptions. Data from unrehearsed speech collected across four different studies showed only a weak to moderate relationship between prosodic phrasing and syntactic structure, such that the likelihood of a prosodic phrase boundary occurring at the end of a syntactic phrase was only slightly above chance. Additionally, correlations between occurrences of prosodic phrase boundaries and speech rate revealed that individuals who speak more slowly are likely to insert more prosodic phrase boundaries, indicating a relationship between prosodic phrasing and speech planning. The findings challenge some categorical approaches to prosody and suggest that prosodic phrasing may be a consequence of planning and recovery in language production, rather than a complement to syntactic phrasing. These results have implications for theories of language production and comprehension, formal theories of phonological structure, and computational tools for generating and interpreting language.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"50 5","pages":"e70224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13180438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prosody is an intrinsic element of language production, linking together multiple levels of linguistic representation to shape both the structure and interpretation of utterances. However, common theories of prosodic phrasing in spoken language often fail to capture factors associated with planning and recovery, as well as performance-based effects related to working memory. Much of what we know about prosody, whether it be the features speakers are thought to generate or the ones listeners are believed to process, is based on forms that are atypical in spoken language. Recent developments in data analysis methods, however, allow for the efficient study of unrehearsed spoken language. The current work aims to develop more ecologically valid theories of prosody and its relationship to syntactic structure through the analysis of unrehearsed scene descriptions. Data from unrehearsed speech collected across four different studies showed only a weak to moderate relationship between prosodic phrasing and syntactic structure, such that the likelihood of a prosodic phrase boundary occurring at the end of a syntactic phrase was only slightly above chance. Additionally, correlations between occurrences of prosodic phrase boundaries and speech rate revealed that individuals who speak more slowly are likely to insert more prosodic phrase boundaries, indicating a relationship between prosodic phrasing and speech planning. The findings challenge some categorical approaches to prosody and suggest that prosodic phrasing may be a consequence of planning and recovery in language production, rather than a complement to syntactic phrasing. These results have implications for theories of language production and comprehension, formal theories of phonological structure, and computational tools for generating and interpreting language.

自然主义语言中的句法和韵律短语对齐。
韵律是语言产生的内在要素,它将多个层次的语言表征联系在一起,形成话语的结构和解释。然而,口语韵律短语的常见理论往往无法捕捉到与计划和恢复有关的因素,以及与工作记忆有关的基于表现的影响。我们对韵律的大部分了解,无论是被认为是说话者产生的特征,还是被认为是听者处理的特征,都是基于口语中的非典型形式。然而,数据分析方法的最新发展允许对未经排练的口语进行有效的研究。目前的工作旨在通过分析未排练的场景描述,发展更多的生态有效的韵律理论及其与句法结构的关系。从四项不同的研究中收集的未经排练的演讲数据显示,韵律短语和句法结构之间只有微弱到中等的关系,因此韵律短语边界出现在句法短语末尾的可能性仅略高于偶然。此外,韵律短语边界的出现与语速之间的相关性表明,语速越慢的人可能会插入更多的韵律短语边界,这表明韵律短语与言语规划之间存在关系。这些发现挑战了一些韵律的分类方法,并表明韵律短语可能是语言生产中规划和恢复的结果,而不是句法短语的补充。这些结果对语言产生和理解理论、音系结构的形式理论以及生成和解释语言的计算工具具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书