Self-Concept in Adolescent Twins: A Czech Study on Zygosity and Normative Comparison.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Klára Kargerová
{"title":"Self-Concept in Adolescent Twins: A Czech Study on Zygosity and Normative Comparison.","authors":"Klára Kargerová","doi":"10.1017/thg.2026.10059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-concept in adolescence plays a key role in psychological adjustment, yet its development in twins remains underexplored - especially in Central Europe. While previous studies suggest minor differences between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, cultural and contextual influences may affect how twins perceive themselves. This mixed-method study examined 336 Czech adolescent twins (168 twin pairs; 32 MZ, 136 DZ) aged 11-15 years. Participants completed three standardized instruments: the Behavioral and Psychological Adjustment Questionnaire (BPQA), the School Performance and Adjustment Scale (SPAS), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Quantitative analyses included <i>t</i> tests, Analyses of Variance (ANOVAs), and Pearson correlations. To triangulate findings, focus group interviews were conducted with three twin pairs and analyzed thematically. No statistically significant differences were found between MZ and DZ twins across BPQA, SPAS, and RSES measures. However, small, nonsignificant trends suggested slightly higher emotional self-concept scores in MZ twins. A modest gender difference emerged: girls reported more internalizing symptoms. Correlational analysis showed that lower behavioral difficulties were associated with higher school adjustment and self-esteem. Thematic analysis from focus groups confirmed key patterns such as the emotional safety of twinship and the struggle for individuality. Zygosity does not appear to be a major predictor of self-concept in early adolescence. Instead, self-perception in twins is shaped by a complex interplay of mental health, family dynamics, and peer context. Future research should compare twin self-concept development across cultures to further examine sociocultural influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2026.10059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-concept in adolescence plays a key role in psychological adjustment, yet its development in twins remains underexplored - especially in Central Europe. While previous studies suggest minor differences between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, cultural and contextual influences may affect how twins perceive themselves. This mixed-method study examined 336 Czech adolescent twins (168 twin pairs; 32 MZ, 136 DZ) aged 11-15 years. Participants completed three standardized instruments: the Behavioral and Psychological Adjustment Questionnaire (BPQA), the School Performance and Adjustment Scale (SPAS), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Quantitative analyses included t tests, Analyses of Variance (ANOVAs), and Pearson correlations. To triangulate findings, focus group interviews were conducted with three twin pairs and analyzed thematically. No statistically significant differences were found between MZ and DZ twins across BPQA, SPAS, and RSES measures. However, small, nonsignificant trends suggested slightly higher emotional self-concept scores in MZ twins. A modest gender difference emerged: girls reported more internalizing symptoms. Correlational analysis showed that lower behavioral difficulties were associated with higher school adjustment and self-esteem. Thematic analysis from focus groups confirmed key patterns such as the emotional safety of twinship and the struggle for individuality. Zygosity does not appear to be a major predictor of self-concept in early adolescence. Instead, self-perception in twins is shaped by a complex interplay of mental health, family dynamics, and peer context. Future research should compare twin self-concept development across cultures to further examine sociocultural influences.

青少年双胞胎的自我概念:一项关于合子性和规范性比较的捷克研究。
青少年时期的自我概念在心理调整中起着关键作用,但在双胞胎中自我概念的发展仍未得到充分研究——尤其是在中欧。虽然之前的研究表明,同卵双胞胎(MZ)和异卵双胞胎(DZ)之间的差异很小,但文化和环境的影响可能会影响双胞胎对自己的看法。这项混合方法研究调查了336对11-15岁的捷克青少年双胞胎(168对双胞胎;32对MZ, 136对DZ)。参与者完成了行为与心理适应问卷(BPQA)、学业表现与适应量表(SPAS)和罗森博格自尊量表(RSES)三种标准化测试工具。定量分析包括t检验、方差分析(ANOVAs)和Pearson相关性。为了三角化调查结果,对三对双胞胎进行了焦点小组访谈,并进行了主题分析。MZ和DZ双胞胎在BPQA、SPAS和RSES测量中没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,微小的、不显著的趋势表明,MZ双胞胎的情绪自我概念得分略高。出现了轻微的性别差异:女孩报告了更多的内化症状。相关分析显示,较低的行为困难与较高的学校适应和自尊有关。焦点小组的专题分析证实了关键模式,如双胞胎的情感安全感和对个性的追求。合子性似乎不是青春期早期自我概念的主要预测因子。相反,双胞胎的自我认知是由心理健康、家庭动态和同伴环境的复杂相互作用形成的。未来的研究应该比较跨文化双胞胎自我概念的发展,以进一步研究社会文化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Twin Research and Human Genetics 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics. Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书