Effectiveness of thermal radiofrequency ablation versus corticosteroid injections for pain reduction in facet-mediated chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-18 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2026.2675483
Justin Le, Han Jie Liu, Andrew Atschinow, Lisa Huang, Jason Tran, Anish Rana, Brandon Lazar, Gilbert Siu
{"title":"Effectiveness of thermal radiofrequency ablation versus corticosteroid injections for pain reduction in facet-mediated chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Justin Le, Han Jie Liu, Andrew Atschinow, Lisa Huang, Jason Tran, Anish Rana, Brandon Lazar, Gilbert Siu","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2675483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Facet joint syndrome (FJS) is a prevalent cause of chronic low back pain (CLBP), resulting in reduced quality of life. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and corticosteroid injections are commonly utilized; however, direct comparative evidence specific to lumbar FJS remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus (from inception to November 2025) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating thermal RFA versus corticosteroid injections. The primary outcome measured was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3- and 6-months. Review Manager 5.4 was used to evaluate mean differences (MD) across outcomes using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Three RCTs with a total of 146 patients were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated significantly greater pain reduction with RFA at both 3-months (MD = -1.27; 95% CI, -1.96 to -0.58; <i>p</i> = 0.0003) and 6-months (MD = -0.86; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.54; <i>p</i> < 0.00001), favoring RFA. Heterogeneity was moderate to low across timepoints. Although significant, these results fell underneath the minimally important clinical difference (MCID).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, thermal RFA provided greater pain reduction than corticosteroid injections for FJS causing CLBP, suggesting a modest short-term advantage in pain reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"921-928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13573533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2675483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Facet joint syndrome (FJS) is a prevalent cause of chronic low back pain (CLBP), resulting in reduced quality of life. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and corticosteroid injections are commonly utilized; however, direct comparative evidence specific to lumbar FJS remains limited.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus (from inception to November 2025) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating thermal RFA versus corticosteroid injections. The primary outcome measured was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3- and 6-months. Review Manager 5.4 was used to evaluate mean differences (MD) across outcomes using a random-effects model.

Result: Three RCTs with a total of 146 patients were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated significantly greater pain reduction with RFA at both 3-months (MD = -1.27; 95% CI, -1.96 to -0.58; p = 0.0003) and 6-months (MD = -0.86; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.54; p < 0.00001), favoring RFA. Heterogeneity was moderate to low across timepoints. Although significant, these results fell underneath the minimally important clinical difference (MCID).

Conclusion: In our study, thermal RFA provided greater pain reduction than corticosteroid injections for FJS causing CLBP, suggesting a modest short-term advantage in pain reduction.

热射频消融与皮质类固醇注射减轻关节面介导的慢性腰痛的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:小关节综合征(FJS)是慢性腰痛(CLBP)的常见原因,导致生活质量下降。射频消融(RFA)和皮质类固醇注射是常用的治疗方法;然而,针对腰椎FJS的直接比较证据仍然有限。方法:综合检索PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library和Scopus(从成立到2025年11月),以确定评估热RFA与皮质类固醇注射的随机对照试验(rct)。主要观察指标为3个月和6个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。使用Review Manager 5.4使用随机效应模型评估结果的平均差异(MD)。结果:纳入3项随机对照试验,共146例患者。综合分析显示,RFA在3个月(MD = -1.27; 95% CI, -1.96至-0.58;p = 0.0003)和6个月(MD = -0.86; 95% CI, -1.18至-0.54;p)时疼痛减轻效果显著,结论:在我们的研究中,对于引起CLBP的FJS,热RFA比皮质类固醇注射更能减轻疼痛,表明在减轻疼痛方面具有适度的短期优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书