Preferences and recommendations from content creators on carnivore diets: a social media analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Almiera Lietz, Janina Dapprich, Tobias Fischer
{"title":"Preferences and recommendations from content creators on carnivore diets: a social media analysis.","authors":"Almiera Lietz, Janina Dapprich, Tobias Fischer","doi":"10.1186/s41043-026-01336-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A carnivore diet is characterised by the exclusive consumption of animal foods, particularly red meat. Digital media, particularly TikTok and Instagram, often praise the health-promoting and disease-preventive properties of the carnivore diet. However, the scientific data on this form of nutrition is currently very limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After creating a coding guide with an accompanying seven-day pretest and modification, a social media analysis was conducted on the Instagram platform over a period of one month. In addition to content related to nutrition and food, aspects such as lifestyle, advertising measures, and political or social statements were also collected. The survey was conducted quantitatively through categorization, accompanied by qualitative documentation of notable findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 19 content creators (47% male, 53% female; aged 25-64) with an average of 157,758 ± 146,405 (25,200-582,000) followers. A total of 1,169 posts during the survey period showed a notable focus on health- and disease-related statements. With the exception of the strong emphasis on red meat, the nutritional and food recommendations were heterogeneous. This was accompanied by ideology-related themes, politically relevant statements, and critical portrayals of institutions such as science, politics, and industry, some of which could be classified as politically right-wing conservative. However, the data does not allow for a clear political classification. Overall, the carnivore diet was portrayed as positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The one-sided view of carnivore nutrition, combined with political and social content, should be viewed critically. Nutrition professionals should pay attention to social media and counteract non-evidence-based claims with scientifically sound information.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13195945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-026-01336-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A carnivore diet is characterised by the exclusive consumption of animal foods, particularly red meat. Digital media, particularly TikTok and Instagram, often praise the health-promoting and disease-preventive properties of the carnivore diet. However, the scientific data on this form of nutrition is currently very limited.

Methods: After creating a coding guide with an accompanying seven-day pretest and modification, a social media analysis was conducted on the Instagram platform over a period of one month. In addition to content related to nutrition and food, aspects such as lifestyle, advertising measures, and political or social statements were also collected. The survey was conducted quantitatively through categorization, accompanied by qualitative documentation of notable findings.

Results: The analysis included 19 content creators (47% male, 53% female; aged 25-64) with an average of 157,758 ± 146,405 (25,200-582,000) followers. A total of 1,169 posts during the survey period showed a notable focus on health- and disease-related statements. With the exception of the strong emphasis on red meat, the nutritional and food recommendations were heterogeneous. This was accompanied by ideology-related themes, politically relevant statements, and critical portrayals of institutions such as science, politics, and industry, some of which could be classified as politically right-wing conservative. However, the data does not allow for a clear political classification. Overall, the carnivore diet was portrayed as positive.

Conclusions: The one-sided view of carnivore nutrition, combined with political and social content, should be viewed critically. Nutrition professionals should pay attention to social media and counteract non-evidence-based claims with scientifically sound information.

内容创作者对食肉动物饮食的偏好和建议:一项社交媒体分析。
背景:食肉动物饮食的特点是只吃动物性食物,尤其是红肉。数字媒体,尤其是TikTok和Instagram,经常赞扬食肉动物饮食的健康促进和疾病预防特性。然而,关于这种营养形式的科学数据目前非常有限。方法:在制作编码指南并进行为期7天的预测和修改后,在Instagram平台上进行为期一个月的社交媒体分析。除了与营养和食品有关的内容外,还收集了生活方式、广告措施、政治或社会声明等方面的内容。该调查是通过分类定量进行的,并附有显著发现的定性文件。结果:该分析包括19名内容创作者(男性占47%,女性占53%,年龄在25-64岁),平均拥有157,758±146,405(25,200-582,000)名粉丝。在调查期间,共有1 169个职位明显侧重于与健康和疾病有关的陈述。除了对红肉的强烈强调外,营养和食物建议各不相同。这伴随着与意识形态相关的主题,政治相关的声明,以及对科学,政治和工业等机构的批判性描述,其中一些可以被归类为政治上的右翼保守派。然而,这些数据并没有明确的政治分类。总的来说,食肉动物的饮食被描绘成积极的。结论:对肉食动物营养的片面认识应结合政治和社会内容予以批判。营养专业人士应该关注社交媒体,用科学可靠的信息来抵制无证据的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书