Real-World Evaluation of Eravacycline Utilization for Infections Caused by Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens.

IF 1.5 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Daniel T Anderson, Joshua Eudy
{"title":"Real-World Evaluation of Eravacycline Utilization for Infections Caused by Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens.","authors":"Daniel T Anderson, Joshua Eudy","doi":"10.1177/87551225261448487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Eravacycline is a fluorocycline with activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) pathogens, but real-world outcome data are lacking for the treatment of infections caused by these organisms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eravacycline for infections caused by MDR and/or DTR organisms. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, observational study of adult patients receiving eravacycline for at least 72 hours for MDR or DTR organisms. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 60-day relapse, 30-day readmission, and adverse drug events (ADEs). <b>Results:</b> A total of 17 patients were included in the analysis. The cohort had a high baseline mortality risk (median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5). Osteoarticular infections were the most common indication (52.9%). The most frequently isolated pathogens were <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. and <i>Enterobacterales</i> spp. (58.9% each). Most infections were polymicrobial. Eravacycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were available in only 47% of cases, and the median time to treatment initiation was 6 days after culture collection. Thirty-day all-cause mortality occurred in 17.6% of patients. Among survivors, 60-day relapse and 30-day readmission were low (6% each). The ADEs occurred in 35% of patients but led to no discontinuations. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this cohort of severely ill patients with complex, predominantly polymicrobial MDR and DTR infections, eravacycline demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy results despite delays from index culture to initiation of targeted therapy. These data suggest eravacycline may be a viable treatment option for infections caused by MDR and DTR organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225261448487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13179294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225261448487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Eravacycline is a fluorocycline with activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) pathogens, but real-world outcome data are lacking for the treatment of infections caused by these organisms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eravacycline for infections caused by MDR and/or DTR organisms. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study of adult patients receiving eravacycline for at least 72 hours for MDR or DTR organisms. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 60-day relapse, 30-day readmission, and adverse drug events (ADEs). Results: A total of 17 patients were included in the analysis. The cohort had a high baseline mortality risk (median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5). Osteoarticular infections were the most common indication (52.9%). The most frequently isolated pathogens were Enterococcus spp. and Enterobacterales spp. (58.9% each). Most infections were polymicrobial. Eravacycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were available in only 47% of cases, and the median time to treatment initiation was 6 days after culture collection. Thirty-day all-cause mortality occurred in 17.6% of patients. Among survivors, 60-day relapse and 30-day readmission were low (6% each). The ADEs occurred in 35% of patients but led to no discontinuations. Conclusions: In this cohort of severely ill patients with complex, predominantly polymicrobial MDR and DTR infections, eravacycline demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy results despite delays from index culture to initiation of targeted therapy. These data suggest eravacycline may be a viable treatment option for infections caused by MDR and DTR organisms.

以拉瓦环素治疗难治性病原体感染的现实世界评价。
背景/目的:依拉瓦环素是一种具有抗多药耐药(MDR)和难以治疗(DTR)病原体活性的氟环素,但缺乏治疗这些微生物引起的感染的实际结果数据。本研究的目的是评估依拉瓦环素治疗耐多药和/或DTR微生物引起的感染的有效性和安全性。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,针对多药耐药或DTR生物体接受依瓦环素治疗至少72小时的成年患者。主要终点为30天死亡率。次要结局包括60天复发、30天再入院和药物不良事件(ADEs)。结果:共纳入17例患者。该队列的基线死亡风险较高(Charlson合并症指数中位数为5)。骨关节感染是最常见的适应症(52.9%)。检出最多的病原菌为肠球菌(Enterococcus)和肠杆菌(Enterobacterales),各占58.9%。大多数感染为多微生物感染。依拉瓦环素最低抑制浓度(MIC)仅在47%的病例中可用,并且开始治疗的中位时间为培养物收集后6天。30天全因死亡率为17.6%。在幸存者中,60天复发率和30天再入院率都很低(各为6%)。35%的患者发生了不良反应,但没有导致停药。结论:在这个复杂的、主要是多微生物的MDR和DTR感染的重症患者队列中,尽管从指数培养到开始靶向治疗有延迟,但依瓦环素显示出良好的安全性和有效性。这些数据表明,依拉瓦环素可能是耐多药和DTR生物引起的感染的可行治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书