Association of thrombogenicity indices with perioperative cardiovascular events after non-cardiac surgery: a prespecified analysis of the PANDA study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-18 DOI:10.1007/s11239-026-03299-z
Hendrianus Hendrianus, Jong-Hwa Ahn, Min-Gyu Kang, Kye-Hwan Kim, Jin-Sin Koh, Sang-Wook Kim, Jin-Yong Hwang, Udaya S Tantry, Paul A Gurbel, Jeong-Rang Park, Young-Hoon Jeong
{"title":"Association of thrombogenicity indices with perioperative cardiovascular events after non-cardiac surgery: a prespecified analysis of the PANDA study.","authors":"Hendrianus Hendrianus, Jong-Hwa Ahn, Min-Gyu Kang, Kye-Hwan Kim, Jin-Sin Koh, Sang-Wook Kim, Jin-Yong Hwang, Udaya S Tantry, Paul A Gurbel, Jeong-Rang Park, Young-Hoon Jeong","doi":"10.1007/s11239-026-03299-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional clinical risk models, such as Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), have limited predictive value for estimating postoperative cardiovascular complications following non-cardiac surgery. This analysis aimed to evaluate prognostic value of thrombogenicity profiles and coronary anatomy for cardiovascular events in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. In a prospective cohort of 120 patients who underwent intermediate-to-high risk surgery, thrombogenicity profiles were assessed using thromboelastography (TEG®) and conventional hemostatic measurements before surgery. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was preoperatively defined as presence of significant stenosis (≥ 50% luminal narrowing) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Postoperative cardiovascular events were defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, myocardial injury, pulmonary edema, non-fatal stroke, and systemic embolism within 30 days after surgery. Sixteen patients (13.3%) experienced cardiovascular events. In multivariable analysis, presence of CAD (odds ratio [OR]: 5.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-17.53; P = 0.009), D-dimer (per 1-μg/mL increase: OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.47; P = 0.030), and platelet-fibrin clot strength (PFCS) measured by TEG® (per 1-mm increase: OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01-1.20; P = 0.027) were independently associated with cardiovascular events. Discrimination of cardiovascular event risk improved progressively with the sequential addition of the following risk stratification models: RCRI alone, RCRI + CCTA, and RCRI + CCTA + thrombogenicity profiles (C-index: 0.660 vs. 0.731 vs. 0.803). Cardiovascular event rates increased with greater risk burden, ranging from 4.2% in patients with no risk components to 77.8% in those with all components present. Integrating thrombogenicity assessment and CCTA with traditional clinical risk models may improve perioperative risk stratification and help guide tailored preventive strategies for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.Clinical trial registration. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02250963.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"1349-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13447407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-026-03299-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional clinical risk models, such as Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), have limited predictive value for estimating postoperative cardiovascular complications following non-cardiac surgery. This analysis aimed to evaluate prognostic value of thrombogenicity profiles and coronary anatomy for cardiovascular events in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. In a prospective cohort of 120 patients who underwent intermediate-to-high risk surgery, thrombogenicity profiles were assessed using thromboelastography (TEG®) and conventional hemostatic measurements before surgery. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was preoperatively defined as presence of significant stenosis (≥ 50% luminal narrowing) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Postoperative cardiovascular events were defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, myocardial injury, pulmonary edema, non-fatal stroke, and systemic embolism within 30 days after surgery. Sixteen patients (13.3%) experienced cardiovascular events. In multivariable analysis, presence of CAD (odds ratio [OR]: 5.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-17.53; P = 0.009), D-dimer (per 1-μg/mL increase: OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.47; P = 0.030), and platelet-fibrin clot strength (PFCS) measured by TEG® (per 1-mm increase: OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01-1.20; P = 0.027) were independently associated with cardiovascular events. Discrimination of cardiovascular event risk improved progressively with the sequential addition of the following risk stratification models: RCRI alone, RCRI + CCTA, and RCRI + CCTA + thrombogenicity profiles (C-index: 0.660 vs. 0.731 vs. 0.803). Cardiovascular event rates increased with greater risk burden, ranging from 4.2% in patients with no risk components to 77.8% in those with all components present. Integrating thrombogenicity assessment and CCTA with traditional clinical risk models may improve perioperative risk stratification and help guide tailored preventive strategies for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.Clinical trial registration. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02250963.

非心脏手术后血栓形成指数与围手术期心血管事件的关联:预先指定的PANDA研究分析。
传统的临床风险模型,如修订心脏风险指数(RCRI),对非心脏手术后心血管并发症的预测价值有限。本分析旨在评估血栓形成概况和冠状动脉解剖对非心脏手术患者心血管事件的预后价值。在一项前瞻性队列研究中,120名接受中高风险手术的患者在手术前使用血栓弹性成像(TEG®)和常规止血测量评估血栓形成概况。冠状动脉疾病(CAD)术前定义为冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)显示明显狭窄(管腔狭窄≥50%)。术后心血管事件定义为术后30天内心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、心肌损伤、肺水肿、非致死性卒中和全身性栓塞。16例患者(13.3%)发生心血管事件。在多变量分析中,CAD的存在(优势比[OR]: 5.11; 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.49-17.53; P = 0.009)、d -二聚体(每增加1 μg/mL: OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.47; P = 0.030)和TEG®测量的血小板-纤维蛋白凝块强度(每增加1 mm: OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01-1.20; P = 0.027)与心血管事件独立相关。随着以下风险分层模型的顺序添加,心血管事件风险的区分逐渐改善:单独RCRI、RCRI + CCTA和RCRI + CCTA +血栓形成性(c指数:0.660、0.731、0.803)。心血管事件发生率随着风险负担的增加而增加,从没有风险因素的患者的4.2%到存在所有风险因素的患者的77.8%不等。将血栓形成性评估和CCTA与传统的临床风险模型相结合,可以改善围手术期风险分层,并有助于指导非心脏手术患者量身定制的预防策略。临床试验注册。网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT02250963。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书