{"title":"Comparative accuracy of instrumented and app-based WBGT for heat-stress screening in agricultural environments in Taiwan.","authors":"Hui-Yu Chen, Jou-Chun Lung, Szu-Yu Lin, Hsin-Yi Wu, Yun-Ru Huang, Po-Wen Li, Li-Wen Liu, Shih-Wei Tsai","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2026.2657310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot research assessed the reliability of wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) screening tools and examined how different microenvironments might affect worker-level WBGT in Taiwanese agriculture. In July 2024, WBGT was recorded at six locations using a QUESTemp monitor with sensors positioned at the head, abdomen, and ankle (weighted 1:2:1), along with portable Kestrel and AZ (AZ) devices and the AIHA<sup>®</sup> app. The AZ devices were evaluated for within-site variations across various work environments, including soil, shade, ground-cover cloth, grassland, asphalt, and ridges. Agreement analyses and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare methods. Median WBGT values ranged in the low to mid-30s°C, with four sites having 50% or more of measurements at or above 32 °C. The Kestrel device demonstrated the closest agreement (bias +0.32 °C; RMSE 0.80 °C), the AZ device tended to underestimate (-0.94 °C; RMSE 1.28 °C), and the AIHA app showed the largest errors (bias -0.83 °C; RMSE 1.82 °C). Microenvironmental factors caused WBGT shifts between -1.25 and +2.87 °C, with decreases caused by working in shaded areas and increases caused by working in reflective ground covers. When screened against the operational WBGT benchmarks (30 °C and 32 °C), the QUESTemp monitor frequently recorded values at or above these thresholds, indicating high-heat conditions. However, the systematic underestimation by the wearable AZ device resulted in a significantly lower detection rate of the high-heat conditions, highlighting the risk of false-negative safety assessments when using uncorrected personal monitors. Overall, the portable/wearable Kestrel and AZ devices showed closer agreement with the QUEST than the weather-station-based app estimates. Given the limitations of regional weather data observed in this pilot study, effective heat-risk management in agriculture requires site-specific monitoring to account for microenvironmental variations, rather than relying solely on app-based estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"596-606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2026.2657310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This pilot research assessed the reliability of wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) screening tools and examined how different microenvironments might affect worker-level WBGT in Taiwanese agriculture. In July 2024, WBGT was recorded at six locations using a QUESTemp monitor with sensors positioned at the head, abdomen, and ankle (weighted 1:2:1), along with portable Kestrel and AZ (AZ) devices and the AIHA® app. The AZ devices were evaluated for within-site variations across various work environments, including soil, shade, ground-cover cloth, grassland, asphalt, and ridges. Agreement analyses and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare methods. Median WBGT values ranged in the low to mid-30s°C, with four sites having 50% or more of measurements at or above 32 °C. The Kestrel device demonstrated the closest agreement (bias +0.32 °C; RMSE 0.80 °C), the AZ device tended to underestimate (-0.94 °C; RMSE 1.28 °C), and the AIHA app showed the largest errors (bias -0.83 °C; RMSE 1.82 °C). Microenvironmental factors caused WBGT shifts between -1.25 and +2.87 °C, with decreases caused by working in shaded areas and increases caused by working in reflective ground covers. When screened against the operational WBGT benchmarks (30 °C and 32 °C), the QUESTemp monitor frequently recorded values at or above these thresholds, indicating high-heat conditions. However, the systematic underestimation by the wearable AZ device resulted in a significantly lower detection rate of the high-heat conditions, highlighting the risk of false-negative safety assessments when using uncorrected personal monitors. Overall, the portable/wearable Kestrel and AZ devices showed closer agreement with the QUEST than the weather-station-based app estimates. Given the limitations of regional weather data observed in this pilot study, effective heat-risk management in agriculture requires site-specific monitoring to account for microenvironmental variations, rather than relying solely on app-based estimates.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality.
The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.