{"title":"The changing face of lung transplant candidates.","authors":"Frank R Leuzzi, Emily S Clausen, Daniel F Dilling","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Lung transplant remains the ultimate life-saving therapy for people with progressive end-stage lung disease. It is important to highlight the evolution of the field in the United States, as its development has had varying impacts on the different lung transplant candidate groups. This review seeks to synthesize current evidence on the evolution of transplantation across various patient groups, reflecting advances in medical therapies, the implementation of the new composite allocation score (CAS) and trends in lung transplant candidate groups over the years.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The proportion of waitlisted candidate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group A) and cystic fibrosis (group C) has declined, reflecting the impact of novel therapeutics and advanced procedural interventions. In contrast, restrictive lung disease patients (group D) now account for most lung transplant recipients, which is likely reflective of our increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygen (ECMO) for bridging and transplant centers expanded eligibility. Pulmonary hypertension patients (group B) continue to face high waitlist mortality despite the change to the new allocation scoring system.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Advancements in medical therapies and the new composite allocation scoring system has altered both the timing and outcomes for various transplant candidate groups. It is important that we continue to study these findings to optimize patient outcomes and organ allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"335-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Lung transplant remains the ultimate life-saving therapy for people with progressive end-stage lung disease. It is important to highlight the evolution of the field in the United States, as its development has had varying impacts on the different lung transplant candidate groups. This review seeks to synthesize current evidence on the evolution of transplantation across various patient groups, reflecting advances in medical therapies, the implementation of the new composite allocation score (CAS) and trends in lung transplant candidate groups over the years.
Recent findings: The proportion of waitlisted candidate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group A) and cystic fibrosis (group C) has declined, reflecting the impact of novel therapeutics and advanced procedural interventions. In contrast, restrictive lung disease patients (group D) now account for most lung transplant recipients, which is likely reflective of our increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygen (ECMO) for bridging and transplant centers expanded eligibility. Pulmonary hypertension patients (group B) continue to face high waitlist mortality despite the change to the new allocation scoring system.
Summary: Advancements in medical therapies and the new composite allocation scoring system has altered both the timing and outcomes for various transplant candidate groups. It is important that we continue to study these findings to optimize patient outcomes and organ allocation.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.