The changing face of lung transplant candidates.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-15 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001273
Frank R Leuzzi, Emily S Clausen, Daniel F Dilling
{"title":"The changing face of lung transplant candidates.","authors":"Frank R Leuzzi, Emily S Clausen, Daniel F Dilling","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Lung transplant remains the ultimate life-saving therapy for people with progressive end-stage lung disease. It is important to highlight the evolution of the field in the United States, as its development has had varying impacts on the different lung transplant candidate groups. This review seeks to synthesize current evidence on the evolution of transplantation across various patient groups, reflecting advances in medical therapies, the implementation of the new composite allocation score (CAS) and trends in lung transplant candidate groups over the years.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The proportion of waitlisted candidate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group A) and cystic fibrosis (group C) has declined, reflecting the impact of novel therapeutics and advanced procedural interventions. In contrast, restrictive lung disease patients (group D) now account for most lung transplant recipients, which is likely reflective of our increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygen (ECMO) for bridging and transplant centers expanded eligibility. Pulmonary hypertension patients (group B) continue to face high waitlist mortality despite the change to the new allocation scoring system.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Advancements in medical therapies and the new composite allocation scoring system has altered both the timing and outcomes for various transplant candidate groups. It is important that we continue to study these findings to optimize patient outcomes and organ allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"335-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Lung transplant remains the ultimate life-saving therapy for people with progressive end-stage lung disease. It is important to highlight the evolution of the field in the United States, as its development has had varying impacts on the different lung transplant candidate groups. This review seeks to synthesize current evidence on the evolution of transplantation across various patient groups, reflecting advances in medical therapies, the implementation of the new composite allocation score (CAS) and trends in lung transplant candidate groups over the years.

Recent findings: The proportion of waitlisted candidate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group A) and cystic fibrosis (group C) has declined, reflecting the impact of novel therapeutics and advanced procedural interventions. In contrast, restrictive lung disease patients (group D) now account for most lung transplant recipients, which is likely reflective of our increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygen (ECMO) for bridging and transplant centers expanded eligibility. Pulmonary hypertension patients (group B) continue to face high waitlist mortality despite the change to the new allocation scoring system.

Summary: Advancements in medical therapies and the new composite allocation scoring system has altered both the timing and outcomes for various transplant candidate groups. It is important that we continue to study these findings to optimize patient outcomes and organ allocation.

肺移植候选者的变化。
综述目的:肺移植仍然是终末期肺病患者最终的救命疗法。重要的是要强调该领域在美国的发展,因为它的发展对不同的肺移植候选群体产生了不同的影响。本综述旨在综合不同患者组移植发展的现有证据,反映了医学治疗的进步、新的复合分配评分(CAS)的实施以及多年来肺移植候选组的趋势。最近的研究发现:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD, A组)和囊性纤维化(C组)的候选者比例下降,反映了新治疗方法和先进的程序性干预的影响。相比之下,限制性肺病患者(D组)现在占肺移植受者的大多数,这可能反映了我们增加使用体外膜氧(ECMO)进行桥接和移植中心扩大的资格。尽管采用了新的分配评分系统,但肺动脉高压患者(B组)仍然面临着较高的等待名单死亡率。摘要:医学治疗的进步和新的复合分配评分系统已经改变了各种移植候选组的时间和结果。我们继续研究这些发现以优化患者预后和器官分配是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书