Randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of oral azithromycin in preventing perinatal infections in pregnant women undergoing labor induction.
Huimin Cao, Yan Zhou, Ning Gu, Ling Yang, Yimin Dai
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of oral azithromycin in preventing perinatal infections in pregnant women undergoing labor induction.","authors":"Huimin Cao, Yan Zhou, Ning Gu, Ling Yang, Yimin Dai","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.71083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates oral azithromycin's effectiveness in reducing intrapartum and puerperal infection rates in term pregnant women undergoing labor induction to guide antibiotic prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 472 women with term singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction. The participants were randomly allocated to receive either 2 g of oral azithromycin (n = 236) or no treatment (n = 236). The primary outcome was the overall perinatal infection rate (which includes both intrapartum and/or puerperal infections). Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications, mode of delivery, and safety parameters. Results analysis adopted an intention-to-treat approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall perinatal infection rate did not differ significantly between the azithromycin group (16.1%) and the control group (16.9%) (absolute risk difference [ARD] = -0.85%, relative risk [RR] = 0.950, 95% confidence interval 0.633-1.425; P = 0.804). Similarly, the incidence of neonatal infectious diseases showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.149). Both groups had comparable outcomes in mode of delivery, maternal-neonatal complications (epidural analgesia, postpartum hemorrhage, and pre- and post-delivery antibiotic use), total labor duration, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal antibiotic administration. Maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, although 3.4% (8/236) of women in the azithromycin group reported gastrointestinal symptoms during labor, with a total adverse event rate of 3.8% (9/236, including one case of dizziness).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of an additional 2 g azithromycin provides no additional benefit in reducing the overall risk of maternal infection and perinatal infection in an already intensive antibiotic prophylactic and well-resourced setting.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2300077629, November 14, 2023 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html).</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":"762-770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluates oral azithromycin's effectiveness in reducing intrapartum and puerperal infection rates in term pregnant women undergoing labor induction to guide antibiotic prophylaxis.
Methods: This single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 472 women with term singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction. The participants were randomly allocated to receive either 2 g of oral azithromycin (n = 236) or no treatment (n = 236). The primary outcome was the overall perinatal infection rate (which includes both intrapartum and/or puerperal infections). Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications, mode of delivery, and safety parameters. Results analysis adopted an intention-to-treat approach.
Results: The overall perinatal infection rate did not differ significantly between the azithromycin group (16.1%) and the control group (16.9%) (absolute risk difference [ARD] = -0.85%, relative risk [RR] = 0.950, 95% confidence interval 0.633-1.425; P = 0.804). Similarly, the incidence of neonatal infectious diseases showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.149). Both groups had comparable outcomes in mode of delivery, maternal-neonatal complications (epidural analgesia, postpartum hemorrhage, and pre- and post-delivery antibiotic use), total labor duration, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal antibiotic administration. Maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, although 3.4% (8/236) of women in the azithromycin group reported gastrointestinal symptoms during labor, with a total adverse event rate of 3.8% (9/236, including one case of dizziness).
Conclusion: The use of an additional 2 g azithromycin provides no additional benefit in reducing the overall risk of maternal infection and perinatal infection in an already intensive antibiotic prophylactic and well-resourced setting.
Clinical trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2300077629, November 14, 2023 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html).
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.