Randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of oral azithromycin in preventing perinatal infections in pregnant women undergoing labor induction.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-16 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.71083
Huimin Cao, Yan Zhou, Ning Gu, Ling Yang, Yimin Dai
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of oral azithromycin in preventing perinatal infections in pregnant women undergoing labor induction.","authors":"Huimin Cao, Yan Zhou, Ning Gu, Ling Yang, Yimin Dai","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.71083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates oral azithromycin's effectiveness in reducing intrapartum and puerperal infection rates in term pregnant women undergoing labor induction to guide antibiotic prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 472 women with term singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction. The participants were randomly allocated to receive either 2 g of oral azithromycin (n = 236) or no treatment (n = 236). The primary outcome was the overall perinatal infection rate (which includes both intrapartum and/or puerperal infections). Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications, mode of delivery, and safety parameters. Results analysis adopted an intention-to-treat approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall perinatal infection rate did not differ significantly between the azithromycin group (16.1%) and the control group (16.9%) (absolute risk difference [ARD] = -0.85%, relative risk [RR] = 0.950, 95% confidence interval 0.633-1.425; P = 0.804). Similarly, the incidence of neonatal infectious diseases showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.149). Both groups had comparable outcomes in mode of delivery, maternal-neonatal complications (epidural analgesia, postpartum hemorrhage, and pre- and post-delivery antibiotic use), total labor duration, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal antibiotic administration. Maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, although 3.4% (8/236) of women in the azithromycin group reported gastrointestinal symptoms during labor, with a total adverse event rate of 3.8% (9/236, including one case of dizziness).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of an additional 2 g azithromycin provides no additional benefit in reducing the overall risk of maternal infection and perinatal infection in an already intensive antibiotic prophylactic and well-resourced setting.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2300077629, November 14, 2023 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html).</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":"762-770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates oral azithromycin's effectiveness in reducing intrapartum and puerperal infection rates in term pregnant women undergoing labor induction to guide antibiotic prophylaxis.

Methods: This single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 472 women with term singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction. The participants were randomly allocated to receive either 2 g of oral azithromycin (n = 236) or no treatment (n = 236). The primary outcome was the overall perinatal infection rate (which includes both intrapartum and/or puerperal infections). Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications, mode of delivery, and safety parameters. Results analysis adopted an intention-to-treat approach.

Results: The overall perinatal infection rate did not differ significantly between the azithromycin group (16.1%) and the control group (16.9%) (absolute risk difference [ARD] = -0.85%, relative risk [RR] = 0.950, 95% confidence interval 0.633-1.425; P = 0.804). Similarly, the incidence of neonatal infectious diseases showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.149). Both groups had comparable outcomes in mode of delivery, maternal-neonatal complications (epidural analgesia, postpartum hemorrhage, and pre- and post-delivery antibiotic use), total labor duration, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal antibiotic administration. Maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups, although 3.4% (8/236) of women in the azithromycin group reported gastrointestinal symptoms during labor, with a total adverse event rate of 3.8% (9/236, including one case of dizziness).

Conclusion: The use of an additional 2 g azithromycin provides no additional benefit in reducing the overall risk of maternal infection and perinatal infection in an already intensive antibiotic prophylactic and well-resourced setting.

Clinical trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2300077629, November 14, 2023 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html).

随机对照试验研究口服阿奇霉素预防引产孕妇围产期感染的疗效。
目的:评价口服阿奇霉素降低引产足月孕妇产时和产褥期感染率的效果,指导抗生素预防。方法:本单中心随机对照试验纳入472例足月单胎妊娠引产妇女。参与者被随机分配接受2g口服阿奇霉素(n = 236)或不接受治疗(n = 236)。主要结局是总围产期感染率(包括产时和/或产褥期感染)。次要结局包括产妇和新生儿并发症、分娩方式和安全参数。结果分析采用意向治疗法。结果:阿奇霉素组围产期总感染率(16.1%)与对照组(16.9%)无显著性差异(绝对风险差[ARD] = -0.85%,相对风险[RR] = 0.950, 95%可信区间0.633 ~ 1.425;P = 0.804)。同样,两组新生儿传染病发病率无显著差异(2.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.149)。两组在分娩方式、母婴并发症(硬膜外镇痛、产后出血、产前和产后抗生素使用)、总分娩时间、新生儿低血糖、新生儿重症监护病房入院和新生儿抗生素给药方面的结果相当。尽管3.4%(8/236)的阿奇霉素组妇女报告了分娩期间的胃肠道症状,但两组之间的产妇结局没有显著差异,总不良事件发生率为3.8%(9/236,包括1例头晕)。结论:在已经加强抗生素预防和资源充足的环境中,额外使用2g阿奇霉素对降低孕产妇感染和围产期感染的总体风险没有额外的好处。临床试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ChiCTR2300077629,注册号为2023年11月14日(https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书