Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yazan Abu Salem, Carlotta Franceschi, Pietro Conte, Giuseppe Anzillotti, Daniele D'Arrigo, Berardo Di Matteo, Elizaveta Kon
{"title":"Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay.","authors":"Yazan Abu Salem, Carlotta Franceschi, Pietro Conte, Giuseppe Anzillotti, Daniele D'Arrigo, Berardo Di Matteo, Elizaveta Kon","doi":"10.1177/19476035261420389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionOsteoarthritis is considered a whole-joint disease involving subchondral bone. Intraosseous therapies such as calcium phosphate (CaP), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer joint-preserving options for knee osteoarthritis (OA).PurposeTo critically appraise and update the clinical evidence on intraosseous injections for knee osteoarthritis, focusing on safety, functional outcomes, need for retreatment, and conversion rates to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD420251104989). Clinical studies reporting outcomes of intraosseous injections with CaP, PRP, or MSCs for knee osteoarthritis with ≥5 patients and ≥6 months of follow-up were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.ResultsTwenty-four studies involving 1,109 patients (mean age, 55 years; mean follow-up, 38 months) met inclusion criteria: 10 on CaP, 6 on PRP, and 8 on MSCs. Five were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most studies reported significant improvements in pain and function. CaP injection outcomes were variable, with TKA conversion rates ranging from 1.3% to 45%. PRP and MSCs studies showed favorable safety profiles and lower conversion rates. Long-term MSCs data indicated sustained relief and delayed TKA over up to 15 years. However, overall study quality was modest, with only one RCT rated as low risk of bias.ConclusionIntraosseous injections may improve symptoms and delay arthroplasty in selected patients with knee OA, with MSCs showing the most favorable long-term results. PRP appears to be a safe option whereas CaP outcomes are more variable. Standardized protocols and high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to optimize patient selection and treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9626,"journal":{"name":"CARTILAGE","volume":" ","pages":"19476035261420389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13179936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CARTILAGE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035261420389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionOsteoarthritis is considered a whole-joint disease involving subchondral bone. Intraosseous therapies such as calcium phosphate (CaP), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer joint-preserving options for knee osteoarthritis (OA).PurposeTo critically appraise and update the clinical evidence on intraosseous injections for knee osteoarthritis, focusing on safety, functional outcomes, need for retreatment, and conversion rates to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD420251104989). Clinical studies reporting outcomes of intraosseous injections with CaP, PRP, or MSCs for knee osteoarthritis with ≥5 patients and ≥6 months of follow-up were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.ResultsTwenty-four studies involving 1,109 patients (mean age, 55 years; mean follow-up, 38 months) met inclusion criteria: 10 on CaP, 6 on PRP, and 8 on MSCs. Five were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most studies reported significant improvements in pain and function. CaP injection outcomes were variable, with TKA conversion rates ranging from 1.3% to 45%. PRP and MSCs studies showed favorable safety profiles and lower conversion rates. Long-term MSCs data indicated sustained relief and delayed TKA over up to 15 years. However, overall study quality was modest, with only one RCT rated as low risk of bias.ConclusionIntraosseous injections may improve symptoms and delay arthroplasty in selected patients with knee OA, with MSCs showing the most favorable long-term results. PRP appears to be a safe option whereas CaP outcomes are more variable. Standardized protocols and high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to optimize patient selection and treatment efficacy.

膝关节软骨下注射:当前临床结果、安全性和关节置换术延迟的综合系统综述。
骨关节炎被认为是一种累及软骨下骨的全关节疾病。骨内治疗如磷酸钙(CaP)、富血小板血浆(PRP)和间充质干细胞(MSCs)为膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)提供了保护关节的选择。目的对骨内注射治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的临床证据进行批判性评价和更新,重点关注安全性、功能结局、再次治疗的必要性以及到全膝关节置换术(TKA)的转换率。方法按照PRISMA指南和PROSPERO注册(CRD420251104989)对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane进行系统评价。临床研究报告骨内注射CaP、PRP或MSCs治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的结果,随访≥5例,随访≥6个月。采用改良的Coleman方法学评分和Cochrane风险偏倚2.0工具评估方法学质量。结果24项研究涉及1109例患者(平均年龄55岁,平均随访38个月),符合纳入标准:10例CaP, 6例PRP, 8例MSCs。其中5项为随机对照试验(RCTs)。大多数研究报告了疼痛和功能的显著改善。CaP注入的结果是可变的,TKA转化率从1.3%到45%不等。PRP和MSCs研究显示出良好的安全性和较低的转化率。长期MSCs数据显示持续缓解和延迟TKA长达15年。然而,总体研究质量一般,只有一项RCT被评为低偏倚风险。结论骨内注射可改善膝关节OA患者的症状并延缓关节置换术,其中MSCs表现出最有利的长期效果。PRP似乎是一个安全的选择,而CaP的结果则更加多变。需要标准化的方案和高质量的随机对照试验进行长期随访,以优化患者选择和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CARTILAGE
CARTILAGE ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: CARTILAGE publishes articles related to the musculoskeletal system with particular attention to cartilage repair, development, function, degeneration, transplantation, and rehabilitation. The journal is a forum for the exchange of ideas for the many types of researchers and clinicians involved in cartilage biology and repair. A primary objective of CARTILAGE is to foster the cross-fertilization of the findings between clinical and basic sciences throughout the various disciplines involved in cartilage repair. The journal publishes full length original manuscripts on all types of cartilage including articular, nasal, auricular, tracheal/bronchial, and intervertebral disc fibrocartilage. Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research are welcome. Review articles, editorials, and letters are also encouraged. The ICRS envisages CARTILAGE as a forum for the exchange of knowledge among clinicians, scientists, patients, and researchers. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) is dedicated to promotion, encouragement, and distribution of fundamental and applied research of cartilage in order to permit a better knowledge of function and dysfunction of articular cartilage and its repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书