Uncovering financial statement fraud detection with multi-modal positive-unlabeled contrastive learning

IF 6.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xusheng Sun , Jingli Huang , Gang Wang , Xuan Zhang , Manlu Liu , Shanlin Yang
{"title":"Uncovering financial statement fraud detection with multi-modal positive-unlabeled contrastive learning","authors":"Xusheng Sun ,&nbsp;Jingli Huang ,&nbsp;Gang Wang ,&nbsp;Xuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Manlu Liu ,&nbsp;Shanlin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2026.101604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current research in AI-based financial statement fraud detection (FSFD) predominantly draws on financial and textual modalities and employs supervised machine learning. However, few attend to the inconsistency between these modalities, which can provide a critical indicator in FSFD. Moreover, the assumption underlying supervised learning is often violated, as non-fraudulent at present may later be revealed to exhibit fraudulent behavior. Accordingly, we introduce multi-modal inconsistency learning combined with Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning, which trains a classifier using only positive and unlabeled data. Nevertheless, two challenges persist: the semantic gap between modalities in inconsistency learning and selection bias when identifying reliable negative instances in PU learning. To overcome these challenges, we propose PUMLCL: Positive-Unlabeled learning with Multi-Level Contrastive Learning. First, to bridge the semantic gap between modalities, we employ instance-level contrastive learning (CL) and introduce an inconsistency-enhancing module for the multi-modal inconsistency learning. Simultaneously, we introduce industry-level contrastive learning to learn the representations that capture distinctive industrial characteristics. Next, utilizing the learned industry-aware representations, we mitigate selection bias by identifying reliable negative instances with respect to the positive ones across industries. Finally, we design a classifier augmented with group-level contrastive loss to enhance the separability between fraudulent and truthful companies. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of PUMLCL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101604"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422326000335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current research in AI-based financial statement fraud detection (FSFD) predominantly draws on financial and textual modalities and employs supervised machine learning. However, few attend to the inconsistency between these modalities, which can provide a critical indicator in FSFD. Moreover, the assumption underlying supervised learning is often violated, as non-fraudulent at present may later be revealed to exhibit fraudulent behavior. Accordingly, we introduce multi-modal inconsistency learning combined with Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning, which trains a classifier using only positive and unlabeled data. Nevertheless, two challenges persist: the semantic gap between modalities in inconsistency learning and selection bias when identifying reliable negative instances in PU learning. To overcome these challenges, we propose PUMLCL: Positive-Unlabeled learning with Multi-Level Contrastive Learning. First, to bridge the semantic gap between modalities, we employ instance-level contrastive learning (CL) and introduce an inconsistency-enhancing module for the multi-modal inconsistency learning. Simultaneously, we introduce industry-level contrastive learning to learn the representations that capture distinctive industrial characteristics. Next, utilizing the learned industry-aware representations, we mitigate selection bias by identifying reliable negative instances with respect to the positive ones across industries. Finally, we design a classifier augmented with group-level contrastive loss to enhance the separability between fraudulent and truthful companies. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of PUMLCL.
利用多模态正无标记对比学习揭示财务报表欺诈检测
目前基于人工智能的财务报表欺诈检测(FSFD)的研究主要利用财务和文本模式,并采用监督机器学习。然而,很少有人注意到这些模式之间的不一致性,这可以提供FSFD的关键指标。此外,监督学习背后的假设经常被违反,因为目前的非欺诈行为可能会在以后被发现表现出欺诈行为。因此,我们引入了多模态不一致学习与positive - unlabeled (PU)学习相结合,它只使用正面和未标记的数据来训练分类器。然而,两个挑战仍然存在:不一致学习模式之间的语义差距和在识别可靠的PU学习负面实例时的选择偏差。为了克服这些挑战,我们提出了PUMLCL: Positive-Unlabeled learning with Multi-Level contrast learning。首先,为了弥合模态之间的语义差距,我们采用了实例级对比学习(CL),并为多模态不一致学习引入了不一致性增强模块。同时,我们引入了行业层面的对比学习来学习捕捉鲜明行业特征的表征。接下来,利用所学到的行业感知表征,我们通过识别相对于各行业的积极实例的可靠负面实例来减轻选择偏差。最后,我们设计了一个具有组级对比损失的分类器,以增强欺诈公司和真实公司之间的可分离性。在实际数据集上的大量实验验证了PUMLCL的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书