Radiological follow-up after endovascular aortic repair - review of surveillance modalities.

Q4 Medicine
Krzysztof Jakimow, Jakub Ciesielka, Katarzyna Sznajder
{"title":"Radiological follow-up after endovascular aortic repair - review of surveillance modalities.","authors":"Krzysztof Jakimow, Jakub Ciesielka, Katarzyna Sznajder","doi":"10.36740/WLek/218764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: This review aims to present diagnostic modalities suitable for monitoring patients after endovascular aortic repair.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted across electronic databases from January 2024 to May 2025 using a combination of keywords and Boolean operators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: While computed tomography angiography remains the reference standard for monitoring after endovascular aortic repair, with 92% sensitivity for endoleak detection, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography offer viable alternatives that eliminate radiation exposure and may reduce contrast agent requirements. Magnetic resonance imaging detects twice as many endoleaks as computed tomography angiography, whereas contrast-enhanced duplex ultrasonography achieves 98% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Treatment of abdominal aorta aneurysm with endovascular aortic repair offers a significant opportunity for a carefully selected patient population. The selection of surveillance modalities should be tailored to individual patient characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"79 4","pages":"855-862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/218764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: This review aims to present diagnostic modalities suitable for monitoring patients after endovascular aortic repair.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted across electronic databases from January 2024 to May 2025 using a combination of keywords and Boolean operators.

Conclusion: Conclusions: While computed tomography angiography remains the reference standard for monitoring after endovascular aortic repair, with 92% sensitivity for endoleak detection, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography offer viable alternatives that eliminate radiation exposure and may reduce contrast agent requirements. Magnetic resonance imaging detects twice as many endoleaks as computed tomography angiography, whereas contrast-enhanced duplex ultrasonography achieves 98% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Treatment of abdominal aorta aneurysm with endovascular aortic repair offers a significant opportunity for a carefully selected patient population. The selection of surveillance modalities should be tailored to individual patient characteristics.

血管内主动脉修复后的影像学随访——监测方式的回顾。
目的:本综述旨在提出适合于血管内主动脉修复术后患者监测的诊断方法。患者和方法:材料和方法:使用关键词和布尔运算符的组合对2024年1月至2025年5月的电子数据库进行文献检索。结论:虽然计算机断层血管造影仍然是血管内主动脉修复后监测的参考标准,但磁共振成像和超声检查对血管内渗漏的检测灵敏度为92%,是消除辐射暴露和减少造影剂需求的可行替代方法。磁共振成像检测到的内渗漏是计算机断层血管造影的两倍,而对比增强的双超声检查的灵敏度为98%,特异性为88%。采用血管内主动脉修复术治疗腹主动脉瘤为精心挑选的患者群体提供了一个重要的机会。监测方式的选择应根据患者的个体特征进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书