Narcissism and Problematic Internet Use: Differential Links to Internet Versus Social Media Addiction-A Multidimensional Meta-Analysis.

IF 4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lanqing Zhou, Junkai Wang, Kexin Lou, XinLu Zheng, Xinyi Li, Xianglong Zeng
{"title":"Narcissism and Problematic Internet Use: Differential Links to Internet Versus Social Media Addiction-A Multidimensional Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lanqing Zhou, Junkai Wang, Kexin Lou, XinLu Zheng, Xinyi Li, Xianglong Zeng","doi":"10.1177/21522715261449054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Problematic Internet use (PIU) is prevalent and harmful, yet findings regarding narcissism remain inconsistent. We meta-analyzed 143 effects from 74 studies (<i>N</i> = 68,705) using random-effects models and relative weight analyses to examine global, dual-dimensional, and trifurcated narcissism across PIU domains. Global narcissism was positively associated with PIU (<i>r</i> = 0.26, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) [0.22, 0.30]) and remained significant after trim-and-fill, selection model, and outlier analyses. Subgroup analyses showed a positive association for social media addiction (<i>r</i> = 0.26, 95 percent CI [0.21, 0.30]), whereas the Internet addiction subgroup showed a smaller but still significant association (<i>r</i> = 0.16, 95 percent CI [0.07, 0.26]). Given the substantial heterogeneity across pooled outcomes, these findings should be interpreted as indicating an overall positive pattern rather than uniform consistency across studies. Dimensional analyses indicated that estimated associations varied according to the dimensional composition of narcissism measures. In dual-dimensional models, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism showed similar estimated associations with general PIU (<i>r</i> = 0.20-0.24) and problematic social media use (<i>r</i> = 0.21-0.22). For Internet addiction, however, the estimated association increased from <i>r</i> = 0.09-0.47 as vulnerable narcissism increased and decreased from <i>r</i> = 0.47-0.09 as grandiose narcissism increased, suggesting a stronger estimated role for vulnerability in this comparatively small subgroup. In trifurcated models, interpersonal antagonism showed the strongest positive estimated association across PIU domains, whereas narcissistic neuroticism showed inverse estimated associations in several analyses, and agentic extraversion showed minimal or nonsignificant effects. Conventional study-level moderators were not statistically significant, but relative-weight-based dimensional composition analyses suggested that estimated associations varied as a function of dimensional composition. Overall, these findings suggest that antagonistic and vulnerable aspects of narcissism may be especially relevant to PIU while also highlighting the importance of moving beyond global narcissism scores and interpreting dimensional estimates cautiously.</p>","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":" ","pages":"357-371"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21522715261449054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problematic Internet use (PIU) is prevalent and harmful, yet findings regarding narcissism remain inconsistent. We meta-analyzed 143 effects from 74 studies (N = 68,705) using random-effects models and relative weight analyses to examine global, dual-dimensional, and trifurcated narcissism across PIU domains. Global narcissism was positively associated with PIU (r = 0.26, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) [0.22, 0.30]) and remained significant after trim-and-fill, selection model, and outlier analyses. Subgroup analyses showed a positive association for social media addiction (r = 0.26, 95 percent CI [0.21, 0.30]), whereas the Internet addiction subgroup showed a smaller but still significant association (r = 0.16, 95 percent CI [0.07, 0.26]). Given the substantial heterogeneity across pooled outcomes, these findings should be interpreted as indicating an overall positive pattern rather than uniform consistency across studies. Dimensional analyses indicated that estimated associations varied according to the dimensional composition of narcissism measures. In dual-dimensional models, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism showed similar estimated associations with general PIU (r = 0.20-0.24) and problematic social media use (r = 0.21-0.22). For Internet addiction, however, the estimated association increased from r = 0.09-0.47 as vulnerable narcissism increased and decreased from r = 0.47-0.09 as grandiose narcissism increased, suggesting a stronger estimated role for vulnerability in this comparatively small subgroup. In trifurcated models, interpersonal antagonism showed the strongest positive estimated association across PIU domains, whereas narcissistic neuroticism showed inverse estimated associations in several analyses, and agentic extraversion showed minimal or nonsignificant effects. Conventional study-level moderators were not statistically significant, but relative-weight-based dimensional composition analyses suggested that estimated associations varied as a function of dimensional composition. Overall, these findings suggest that antagonistic and vulnerable aspects of narcissism may be especially relevant to PIU while also highlighting the importance of moving beyond global narcissism scores and interpreting dimensional estimates cautiously.

自恋和有问题的网络使用:网络与社交媒体成瘾的不同联系——一个多维元分析。
有问题的互联网使用(PIU)是普遍和有害的,然而关于自恋的研究结果仍然不一致。我们使用随机效应模型和相对权重分析,对74项研究(N = 68,705)中的143个效应进行了meta分析,以检验PIU领域的全局、二维和三重自恋。整体自恋与PIU呈正相关(r = 0.26, 95%置信区间(CI)[0.22, 0.30]),并且在修整和填充、选择模型和异常值分析后仍然显著。亚组分析显示社交媒体成瘾正相关(r = 0.26, 95% CI[0.21, 0.30]),而网络成瘾亚组显示较小但仍显着的关联(r = 0.16, 95% CI[0.07, 0.26])。考虑到合并结果的巨大异质性,这些发现应被解释为表明总体上是积极的模式,而不是所有研究的统一一致性。维度分析表明,根据自恋测量的维度组成,估计的关联有所不同。在二维模型中,浮夸型和脆弱型自恋与一般PIU (r = 0.20-0.24)和有问题的社交媒体使用(r = 0.21-0.22)显示出相似的估计关联。然而,对于网络成瘾,随着脆弱自恋的增加,估计关联从r = 0.09-0.47增加,随着浮夸自恋的增加,估计关联从r = 0.47-0.09下降,表明脆弱性在这个相对较小的亚组中有更强的估计作用。在三分形模型中,人际对抗性在PIU域中表现出最强的正相关,而自恋神经质在几个分析中表现出负相关,而代理外向性在PIU域中表现出最小或不显著的影响。传统的研究水平调节因子在统计上不显著,但基于相对权重的维度组成分析表明,估计的关联随着维度组成的函数而变化。总的来说,这些发现表明,自恋的敌对和脆弱方面可能与PIU特别相关,同时也强调了超越全球自恋得分和谨慎解释维度估计的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书