Standardized Placental Pathology Reporting: Improving Quality and Clinical Utility Recommendations From the Society for Pediatric Pathology Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force.

IF 1.3
Sanjita Ravishankar, Francois Cady, Chrystalle Katte Carreon, Eumenia Castro, Virginia E Duncan, Philip J Katzman, Drucilla J Roberts, Karen K Mestan, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Heather Florescue, Lindsey Wimmer, Alicia A Loehlein, Mana Parast
{"title":"Standardized Placental Pathology Reporting: Improving Quality and Clinical Utility Recommendations From the Society for Pediatric Pathology Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force.","authors":"Sanjita Ravishankar, Francois Cady, Chrystalle Katte Carreon, Eumenia Castro, Virginia E Duncan, Philip J Katzman, Drucilla J Roberts, Karen K Mestan, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Heather Florescue, Lindsey Wimmer, Alicia A Loehlein, Mana Parast","doi":"10.1177/10935266261444440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Placental pathology has benefited greatly from the standardization of definitions provided by the Amsterdam consensus, however the quality of placental pathology reporting continues to suffer from a lack of unified and practical reporting standards and difficulty in applying the Amsterdam definitions to general clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force was formed to develop a standardized placental pathology reporting template based on a combination of evidence-based literature review and consensus expert opinion, and designed to complement the Amsterdam definitions. The goal of the task force was to create a practical, succinct, clinically informative, and easily customizable template that can be adapted to varying institutional preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed standardized reporting template encompasses a wide breadth of common placental pathologic diagnoses and provides recommended diagnostic terminology, explanatory comments and practical tips, and notes to ease the application of definitions. Input from pathologists from different practice settings, obstetric providers, neonatologists, and patient advocates was integrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of a standardized placental reporting template holds the potential to reform and advance placental pathology practice across the diverse range of settings in which it is currently performed. The proposed template is adaptable, allowing pathologists to include additional information beyond the recommended standard as needed/preferred. Widespread adoption of this framework will enhance the clinical utility and value of placental pathology reports by clinicians and patients, ultimately supporting more informed and appropriate management of neonates and future pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520743,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society","volume":" ","pages":"479-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13558814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10935266261444440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Placental pathology has benefited greatly from the standardization of definitions provided by the Amsterdam consensus, however the quality of placental pathology reporting continues to suffer from a lack of unified and practical reporting standards and difficulty in applying the Amsterdam definitions to general clinical practice.

Methods: A multidisciplinary Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force was formed to develop a standardized placental pathology reporting template based on a combination of evidence-based literature review and consensus expert opinion, and designed to complement the Amsterdam definitions. The goal of the task force was to create a practical, succinct, clinically informative, and easily customizable template that can be adapted to varying institutional preferences.

Results: The proposed standardized reporting template encompasses a wide breadth of common placental pathologic diagnoses and provides recommended diagnostic terminology, explanatory comments and practical tips, and notes to ease the application of definitions. Input from pathologists from different practice settings, obstetric providers, neonatologists, and patient advocates was integrated.

Conclusions: The introduction of a standardized placental reporting template holds the potential to reform and advance placental pathology practice across the diverse range of settings in which it is currently performed. The proposed template is adaptable, allowing pathologists to include additional information beyond the recommended standard as needed/preferred. Widespread adoption of this framework will enhance the clinical utility and value of placental pathology reports by clinicians and patients, ultimately supporting more informed and appropriate management of neonates and future pregnancies.

标准化的胎盘病理报告:提高儿科病理学会胎盘病理报告工作组的质量和临床实用建议。
背景:胎盘病理学从阿姆斯特丹共识提供的定义标准化中受益匪浅,然而,胎盘病理学报告的质量继续受到缺乏统一和实用报告标准的影响,并且难以将阿姆斯特丹定义应用于一般临床实践。方法:成立多学科胎盘病理报告工作组,基于循证文献综述和专家共识意见的结合,制定标准化的胎盘病理报告模板,旨在补充阿姆斯特丹定义。工作组的目标是创建一个实用、简洁、临床信息丰富、易于定制的模板,可以适应不同机构的偏好。结果:提出的标准化报告模板涵盖了广泛的常见胎盘病理诊断,并提供了推荐的诊断术语、解释性评论和实用提示,以及简化定义应用的注释。整合了来自不同执业环境的病理学家、产科医生、新生儿医生和患者倡导者的意见。结论:标准化胎盘报告模板的引入具有改革和推进胎盘病理实践的潜力,目前在不同的环境中进行。所建议的模板具有适应性,允许病理学家根据需要/偏好包括推荐标准之外的其他信息。该框架的广泛采用将提高临床医生和患者胎盘病理报告的临床效用和价值,最终支持对新生儿和未来妊娠进行更明智和适当的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书