Teaching and training in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia

P. Diéguez García , S. López Álvarez , C. del Olmo
{"title":"Teaching and training in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia","authors":"P. Diéguez García ,&nbsp;S. López Álvarez ,&nbsp;C. del Olmo","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2026.502136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread adoption of ultrasound in regional anaesthesia has profoundly changed both clinical practice and the way this field should be taught. The current challenge is not merely the availability of more blocks or approaches, but preventing the growing number of variants and terms from leading to fragmented learning and inconsistent clinical decision-making. From this standpoint, competence should be viewed as the integration of clinical judgement, evidence-informed selection, pharmacological knowledge, safe technical performance, proper documentation, patient communication, and follow-up. Within such a framework, simulation should occupy a central place in training pathways not only during residency, but also in the continuing education of professionals involved in regional anaesthesia, because it supports competency-based progression and allows more objective assessment of learning outcomes. Accreditation processes promoted by scientific societies may help standardise practice, provided that adequate educational resources and teaching capacity are available for real implementation. In high-pressure clinical settings with frequent staff turnover, standardisation of training and care processes does not oppose clinical individualisation, but rather makes it safer, more reproducible, and better adapted to each patient’s characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":"73 6","pages":"Article 502136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341192926001150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread adoption of ultrasound in regional anaesthesia has profoundly changed both clinical practice and the way this field should be taught. The current challenge is not merely the availability of more blocks or approaches, but preventing the growing number of variants and terms from leading to fragmented learning and inconsistent clinical decision-making. From this standpoint, competence should be viewed as the integration of clinical judgement, evidence-informed selection, pharmacological knowledge, safe technical performance, proper documentation, patient communication, and follow-up. Within such a framework, simulation should occupy a central place in training pathways not only during residency, but also in the continuing education of professionals involved in regional anaesthesia, because it supports competency-based progression and allows more objective assessment of learning outcomes. Accreditation processes promoted by scientific societies may help standardise practice, provided that adequate educational resources and teaching capacity are available for real implementation. In high-pressure clinical settings with frequent staff turnover, standardisation of training and care processes does not oppose clinical individualisation, but rather makes it safer, more reproducible, and better adapted to each patient’s characteristics.
超声引导下区域麻醉的教学与培训。
超声在局部麻醉中的广泛应用深刻地改变了临床实践和这一领域的教学方式。当前的挑战不仅仅是更多的块或方法的可用性,而是防止越来越多的变体和术语导致碎片化的学习和不一致的临床决策。从这个角度来看,能力应该被视为临床判断、循证选择、药理学知识、安全技术性能、适当的文件、患者沟通和随访的综合。在这样的框架下,模拟不仅应该在住院医师的培训路径中占据中心位置,而且应该在区域麻醉专业人员的继续教育中占据中心位置,因为它支持基于能力的进步,并允许对学习结果进行更客观的评估。如果有足够的教育资源和教学能力可供真正实施,科学学会推动的认证过程可能有助于使实践标准化。在高压的临床环境中,人员频繁更换,培训和护理过程的标准化并不反对临床个体化,而是使其更安全,更可复制,并更好地适应每个患者的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书